[Bug fortran/84270] [7/8 Regression] optimization bug with assumed size array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/84277] New: [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 Bug ID: 84277 Summary: [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug target/84278] New: claims initv4sfv2sf is available but inits through stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278 Bug ID: 84278 Summary: claims initv4sfv2sf is available but inits through stack Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug target/84278] claims initv4sfv2sf is available but inits through stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84248] [8 Regression] r257414 failed too bootstrap in libitm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/83204] [6/7/8 Regression] c++ -std=c++14 ICE in maybe_undo_parenthesized_ref, at cp/semantics.c:1694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83204 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Feb 8 09:06:33 2018 New Revision: 257478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2018-02-08 Paolo Carlini PR c++/83204 *

[Bug c++/83204] [6/7 Regression] c++ -std=c++14 ICE in maybe_undo_parenthesized_ref, at cp/semantics.c:1694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83204 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] c++ |[6/7 Regression] c++ |

[Bug target/83789] __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789 --- Comment #5 from Kaushikp --- >> Kaushik: is this fixed with r256762? No. The testcase still fails with internal compiler error: Segmentation fault. This revision (r256762) dated 16th Jan 2018 still calls 'CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v4si_2op' insn f

[Bug middle-end/84251] [8 Regression] Performance regression in gcc 8 when comparing floating point numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/84251] [8 Regression] Performance regression in gcc 8 when comparing floating point numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Testcase without headers: int cmp (double a, double b) { if (__builtin_isnan (a) || __builtin_isnan (b)) __builtin_abort (); return a == b; } In *.optimized we have: if (a_2(D) unord b_3(D)) g

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to amker from comment #23) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #21) > > So after r257453 we improve the situation pre-IVOPTs to just > > 6 IVs (duplicated but trivially equivalent) plus one

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84270] [7/8 Regression] optimization bug with assumed size array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|NEW

[Bug ada/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82604] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 410.bwaves ~50% performance regression with trunk@253679 when ftree-parallelize-loops is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 --- Comment #26 from Alexander Nesterovskiy --- Created attachment 43361 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43361&action=edit r253678 vs r256990_work_spin

[Bug tree-optimization/82604] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 410.bwaves ~50% performance regression with trunk@253679 when ftree-parallelize-loops is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 --- Comment #27 from Alexander Nesterovskiy --- Place of interest here is a loop in mat_times_vec function. For r253678 a mat_times_vec.constprop._loopfn.0 is created with autopar. For r256990 the mat_times_vec is inlined into bi_cgstab_block and

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/83806] [6/7/8 Regression] Spurious -Wunused-but-set-parameter with nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83806 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|paolo.carlin

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- In the Fortran case the DECL_VALUE_EXPR is COMPONENT_REF and rtl_for_decl_location gets to a location via loc_list_from_tree which eventually looks at DECL_VALUE_EXPR. I'm quite sure the rev. is responsible

[Bug target/84279] New: [8 Regression] powerpc64le ICE on cvc4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279 Bug ID: 84279 Summary: [8 Regression] powerpc64le ICE on cvc4 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/84279] [8 Regression] powerpc64le ICE on cvc4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/84279] [8 Regression] powerpc64le ICE on cvc4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- pr84279.C: In member function ‘void B::m5(B::D*)’: pr84279.C:29:79: error: could not split insn void B::m5 (D *c) { unsigned x; C ar; A am; if (ar.m1 (c->e, am)) m6 (x, am); }

[Bug c++/84280] New: Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 Bug ID: 84280 Summary: Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- r256598 deleted *movti_string (and all other string instructions); does this bug still happen? That patch was committed 20180112.

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes, it does (just verified with latest trunk). ;; TImode/PTImode is similar, except that we usually want to compute the ;; address into a register and use lsi/stsi (the exception is during reload). (define_

[Bug tree-optimization/84261] gcc fails to vectorize a function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp Component|libgomp

[Bug tree-optimization/84261] gcc fails to vectorize a function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261 --- Comment #5 from Marcin Krotkiewski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > The declare simd on the functions is essentially an implicit loop around the > whole body, so the function in this cases is passed a V4DFmode argument and >

[Bug tree-optimization/84224] [7/8 Regression] ICE in execute, at gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c:448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84224 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Thu Feb 8 11:16:25 2018 New Revision: 257480 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257480&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84224 * gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c (pa

[Bug tree-optimization/84224] [7 Regression] ICE in execute, at gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c:448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84224 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/84281] New: Heap grows indefinitely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281 Bug ID: 84281 Summary: Heap grows indefinitely Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: u

[Bug target/84272] [8 Regression] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free ../../gcc/config/aarch64/cortex-a57-fma-steering.c:519 in fma_node::get_parity()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2018

[Bug c++/84281] Heap grows indefinitely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||memory-hog --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug target/84280] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84281] Heap grows indefinitely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281 --- Comment #2 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- I guess that depends on the definition of "meaningful". It reproduces the problem, so I'd say yes. ;)

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #36 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com --- The patch fixes the issue for SKX is in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00405.html I will close the PR after the patch has been merged. Thank you very much for all involved.

[Bug go/84215] Random results in go/libgo tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- Today on ARM: --- FAIL: TestExtraFiles (1.19s) testing.go:560: TestExtraFiles: Something already leaked - closed fd 63 testing.go:560: Run: exit status 1; stdout "leaked parent file. fd = 58

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.5.0 Summary|Performance regre

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #3 from Patrik Huber --- @Richard: I'm not 100% sure what you mean with "preprocessed source" but I googled and you probably mean the output of compiling with "-c -save-temps". Please see attached.

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #4 from Patrik Huber --- Created attachment 43363 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43363&action=edit gcc5_gemm_test.s

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #5 from Patrik Huber --- Created attachment 43364 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43364&action=edit gcc7_gemm_test.s

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #6 from Patrik Huber --- I could also upload you the .ii files but they are 5 MB, which the bugtracker doesn't allow (1 MB limit).

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #7 from Patrik Huber --- Created attachment 43365 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43365&action=edit gemm_test.cpp

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #8 from Patrik Huber --- Created attachment 43366 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43366&action=edit full_log.txt

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Patrik Huber from comment #6) > I could also upload you the .ii files but they are 5 MB, which the > bugtracker doesn't allow (1 MB limit). preprocessed sources are the .ii files (you can use comp

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #10 from Patrik Huber --- Created attachment 43367 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43367&action=edit gcc5_gemm_test.ii

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #11 from Patrik Huber --- Created attachment 43368 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43368&action=edit gcc7_gemm_test.ii

[Bug rtl-optimization/83459] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83459 --- Comment #3 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Thu Feb 8 12:29:28 2018 New Revision: 257481 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257481&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR84068, PR83459: Fix sort order of SCHED_PRESSURE_MODEL The comparison function

[Bug rtl-optimization/84068] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with -fno-sched-critical-path-heuristic --param=max-sched-extend-regions-iters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84068 --- Comment #5 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Thu Feb 8 12:29:28 2018 New Revision: 257481 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257481&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR84068, PR83459: Fix sort order of SCHED_PRESSURE_MODEL The comparison function

[Bug rtl-optimization/84068] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with -fno-sched-critical-path-heuristic --param=max-sched-extend-regions-iters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84068 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/82407] [meta-bug] qsort_chk fallout tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407 Bug 82407 depends on bug 83459, which changed state. Bug 83459 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug rtl-optimization/83459] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83459 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Bug 84141 depends on bug 84155, which changed state. Bug 84155 Summary: [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||derodat at adacore dot com --- C

[Bug c++/81589] Possible False-Positive with decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81589 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/82952] Hang compiling with g++ -fsanitize=undefined -Wduplicated-branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82952 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/84282] [8 Regression] Probably rejected valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84282 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-2-8 Known to work|

[Bug c++/84282] New: [8 Regression] Probably rejected valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84282 Bug ID: 84282 Summary: [8 Regression] Probably rejected valid code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/84265] [8 Regression] ICE in vect_permute_load_chain, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:5933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84265 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED C

[Bug c++/84282] [8 Regression] Probably rejected valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84282 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, derodat at adacore dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 > > Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 Bug 84037 depends on bug 84278, which changed state. Bug 84278 Summary: claims initv4sfv2sf is available but inits through stack https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/84278] claims initv4sfv2sf is available but inits through stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84278] claims initv4sfv2sf is available but inits through stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Feb 8 12:53:19 2018 New Revision: 257483 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257483&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-08 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/84278

[Bug tree-optimization/84261] gcc fails to vectorize a function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Marcin Krotkiewski from comment #5) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > > The declare simd on the functions is essentially an implicit loop around the > > whole body, so the function

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug target/84280] [6/7/8 Regression] Performance regression in g++-7 with Eigen for non-AVX2 CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84280 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, the preprocessed source(s) are hard to work with given the eigen headers seem to have conditional code on the enabled ISAs. >From a quick look it seems to be inlining related? My past experience says

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #37 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Richi, > So the fix quite possibly only papers over the problem in general > - it changes to use a new, non-cached variant in this place but I see > many more callers to gfc_get_dt

[Bug middle-end/84233] [7/8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gimple_assign_rhs_code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84233 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Feb 8 13:29:15 2018 New Revision: 257486 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257486&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-08 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/84233

[Bug middle-end/84233] [7/8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gimple_assign_rhs_code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84233] [7/8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gimple_assign_rhs_code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84233 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Feb 8 13:30:49 2018 New Revision: 257487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257487&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-08 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/84233

[Bug c++/84282] [8 Regression] Probably rejected valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84282 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84282] [8 Regression] Probably rejected valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84282 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Thank you both for clarification.

[Bug tree-optimization/38785] [6/7/8 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785 --- Comment #50 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke --- It certainly is the case that the merit of an optimization can often not be evaluated until forther optimization passes are done. In fact, as an assembly programmer, evaluating potential alternativ

[Bug c++/84283] New: std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84283 Bug ID: 84283 Summary: std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/84284] New: ICE compiling printf("\n"); with -fexec-charset=UTF-16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84284 Bug ID: 84284 Summary: ICE compiling printf("\n"); with -fexec-charset=UTF-16 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug c++/84283] std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84283 Liu Hao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com --- Comment #1 from Li

[Bug c++/84283] std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84283 --- Comment #2 from Liu Hao --- Ditto, but even more reduced: -- #include template struct map { template::value>::type> void * insert(void * pos, Pair&& x); template void insert(Iterator first, Iterator last)

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #10 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > Yeah, setting DECL_PRESERVE_P would make it possible to add the > location late since we'd not remove the decl. Currently it's simply > gone and the ea

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84283] std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84283 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84283] [8 Regression] std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84283 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Su

[Bug sanitizer/84285] New: Fail to statically link with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84285 Bug ID: 84285 Summary: Fail to statically link with -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, derodat at adacore dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 > > --- Comment #10 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug target/84154] [7/8 Regression] PowerPC GCC 7 and 8 have regression in converting fp to short/char and returning it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84154 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- Does this still need a 7 backport?

[Bug c++/84283] [8 Regression] std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84283 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Another example from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542132 namespace std { struct true_type { static constexpr bool value = true; }; struct false_type { static constexpr bool value = fal

[Bug target/84154] [7/8 Regression] PowerPC GCC 7 and 8 have regression in converting fp to short/char and returning it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84154 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/84285] Fail to statically link with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84285 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/81360] [8 Regression] ice in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81360 --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Feb 8 14:51:51 2018 New Revision: 257490 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257490&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/81360 * cgraph.h (symtab_node::output_to_lto_symbo

[Bug sanitizer/84285] Fail to statically link with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84285 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/84285] Fail to statically link with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84285 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43371 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43371&action=edit gcc8-pr84285.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/84286] New: [8 Regression] Segmentation fault of a chromium binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286 Bug ID: 84286 Summary: [8 Regression] Segmentation fault of a chromium binary Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- I believe DWARF doesn't have a way to push address of a DIE (if it has one), only can use DW_OP_addr which pushes an address of a relocatable symbol rather than a DIE.

[Bug c++/84286] [8 Regression] Segmentation fault of a chromium binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Version

[Bug c++/84287] New: pointer to member function type with dependent parameter cannot be mangled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84287 Bug ID: 84287 Summary: pointer to member function type with dependent parameter cannot be mangled Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/84283] [8 Regression] std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

  1   2   3   >