https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I don't have a recent gcc-6 set of test results but the bug is fixed in
gcc-7 and gcc-8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58931
--- Comment #5 from Aaron Graham ---
Created attachment 43261
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43261&action=edit
Patch to check for overflow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I don't have a recent gcc-6 set of test results but the bug is fixed in
> gcc-7 and gcc-8.
By the xfail? Can the PR be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-01-26 8:29 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> By the xfail? Can the PR be closed?
I'll have to investigate...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82994
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84040
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jan 27 06:28:15 2018
New Revision: 257119
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257119&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/84040
* sched-deps.c (sched_macro_fuse_insns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84040
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84034
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Sat Jan 27 06:44:25 2018
New Revision: 257120
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257120&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-27 Bernd Edlinger
PR diagnostic/84034
* di
201 - 208 of 208 matches
Mail list logo