https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83963
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 23 08:00:20 2018
New Revision: 256973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256973&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/83963
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83977
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83913
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #4 from Rafał Mszal ---
Created attachment 43210
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43210&action=edit
Basic example of main funtion with LTO failure.
This is simple example of observed LTO issue. RTC1_IRQHandler is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #5 from Rafał Mszal ---
Created attachment 43211
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43211&action=edit
Makefile that causes failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Somehow the VAR_DECL for 'y' is in the PARM_DECL chain for the FUNCTION_DECL s:
>
QI
size
unit-size
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x7fff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #6 from Rafał Mszal ---
Created attachment 43212
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43212&action=edit
Startup file for the nRF52 microcontroller.
This is typical startup for nRF5x microcontrollers. The main thing th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83977
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #7 from Rafał Mszal ---
Thanks for response.
I've send some basic example of the failure. However, it needs some others file
to compile and link, like linker, SystemInit function decalration and so on.
I've just send you most import
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83988
Bug ID: 83988
Summary: Internal compiler error in tsubst_baselink
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps free_lang_data pass could drop DECL_VALUE_EXPRs from DECL_IGNORED_P
variables, because those will not be useful for debug info anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Still not 100% sure which Handler should prevail in resolving the symbol for
Dispatch. Currently it seems the non-weak one prevails which looks correct.
I think in both cases the resolution from GNU ld is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, hurwic8 at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
>
> --- Comment #7 from Rafał Mszal ---
> Thanks for response.
>
> I've send some basi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83989
Bug ID: 83989
Summary: -Wrestrict false positive with malloc-style functions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83983
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83947
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jan 23 10:42:10 2018
New Revision: 256976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Disable some patterns for fold-left reductions (PR 83965
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83888
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jan 23 10:42:32 2018
New Revision: 256977
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256977&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix vect_float markup for a couple of tests (PR 83888)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83888
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83985
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r254602.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83985
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83988
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990
Bug ID: 83990
Summary: Spurious "potential null pointer dereference" warning
regression from 7.1 onwards
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81082
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990
--- Comment #1 from Tony E Lewis ---
Created attachment 43218
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43218&action=edit
Verbose output from GCC 7.2.0 [Ubuntu 17.10]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jan 23 11:10:47 2018
New Revision: 256980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256980&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
-Warray-bounds: Fix false positive in some "switch" stmts (PR
tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83312
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jan 23 11:10:47 2018
New Revision: 256980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256980&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
-Warray-bounds: Fix false positive in some "switch" stmts (PR
tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 83510, which changed state.
Bug 83510 Summary: [8 Regression] Recent changes for -Warray-bounds trigger
false positive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83962
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83950
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83962
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81082
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So moving the transform to match.pd will only have an effect in late VRP
given we need loop header copying to derive a range for the bNs.
The following is what I've done, remove the problematic foldings fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #15 from Er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83988
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Patch candidate:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01942.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, the bug seems to FAIL at random, as shown by:
while :; do echo -n .; make check RUNTESTFLAGS=prettyprinters.exp=80276.cc >
/dev/null 2>/dev/null; grep -q ^FAIL testsuite/libstdc++.log && break; done
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83986
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83986
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83962
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83991
Bug ID: 83991
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c fail
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83992
Bug ID: 83992
Summary: wrong debug info: wrong NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_BEG placement
causes
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82819
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I _think_ that in this particular case (and maybe others) we can avoid the
issue by not telling ISL anything about s4 -- this means treating s4 += xn
(which has
associated PHIs and loop-closed PHIs) as black
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
>
>What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83991
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82851
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83958
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 23 13:52:23 2018
New Revision: 256984
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256984&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83958
* decl.c (cp_finish_decomp): Diagnose if refe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83958
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE: |[7 Regression] ICE:
|S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83978
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 23 14:04:18 2018
New Revision: 256985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82882
PR c++/83978
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr82882.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 23 14:04:18 2018
New Revision: 256985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82882
PR c++/83978
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr82882.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83720
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83988
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83988
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jan 23 14:08:11 2018
New Revision: 256986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/839888] Baselink tsubst ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993
Bug ID: 83993
Summary: error: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993
--- Comment #1 from Falk Hueffner ---
/tmp% cat test.cc
extern const int table[];
const int* const ptable = &table[0];
int f() { return ptable[0]; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83974
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01955.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81082
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " + " 0
(found 2 times)
the loop is gone but we end up with unfolded
_1 = (unsigned int) n_5;
_10 = _1 + 4294967295;
_6 = (int) _10;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83851
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|rsa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83851
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
To give a few more details, the loop in question is:
.L3:
mov ip, r3
add r3, r3, #48
cmp r3, r4
vld3.32 {d16, d18, d20}, [ip]!
vld3.32 {d17,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83994
Bug ID: 83994
Summary: %ebx is clobbered by stack-clash probing for regparm-3
function in PIC mode
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83995
Bug ID: 83995
Summary: ICE: cross compiling for cr16-elf on msys2
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83986
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81082
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> So moving the transform to match.pd will only have an effect in late VRP
> given we need loop header copying to derive a range for the bNs.
>
> T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83947
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83994
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83862
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Jan 23 15:07:00 2018
New Revision: 256987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-01-23 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83862
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
GCC 6 backport applied, GCC 7 backport waiting for GCC 7.3 to ship, before
applying the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palves at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Bernd K changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prof7bit at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906
Pedro Alves changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palves at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83994
--- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer ---
It's still callee-saved, so it is picked by get_scratch_register_on_entry if it
is saved by the function, under the assumption that it is used only after the
prologue has saved it and there is no need to sav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jan 23 15:46:02 2018
New Revision: 256989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle trailing arrays in ODR warning (PR lto/81440).
2018-01-23 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83992
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
In the 147t.cddce2 dump (as dumped with -fdump-tree-all-lineno) I see this:
[local count: 1063004407]:
# j_8 = PHI <[foo.go:6:7] 0(3), [foo.go:6:31] j_5(6)>
# DEBUG j => j_8
[foo.go:6:31] j_5 = j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83994
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I think the problem here is that we don't force the register saves to happen
prior to probing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83994
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The clang++ error on e is:
pr83993-2.C:5:22: error: constexpr variable 'e' must be initialized by a
constant expression
constexpr const int *e = &a[10];
^ ~~
pr83993-2.C:5:27: note:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83991
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83992
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604
--- Comment #18 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Jan 23 16:47:03 2018
New Revision: 256990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/82604
* tree-loop-distribu
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
