https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #4)
> I'd suggest sticking with the libressl test case from comment 1, and
> ignoring the kernel version until the libressl one is fully understood. It
> seems very l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78240
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83921
Bug ID: 83921
Summary: GCC rejects constexpr initialization of empty
aggregate.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83922
Bug ID: 83922
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
contains_struct_check)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67935
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81601
--- Comment #15 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> I think the easiest fix is move optimize_bit_field_compare from where it is
> currently done and do it only in some late gimple pass, around
> pass_fold_builti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83883
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Jan 18 04:05:27 2018
New Revision: 256833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256833&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/83883
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-26.c: Tighten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83883
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81601
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Well, my understanding of how other compilers have handled bitfields would
indicate that deferring optimization of them until later is advisable.
Essentially they pretended bitfields had word precision tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83787
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Jan 18 04:24:48 2018
New Revision: 256835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/83787
compiler: pass int to makechan, call makech
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83787
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
--- Comment #9 from Joshua Kinard ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8)
> > FWIW, reversing PR59461 (some manual edits required) on gcc-7_1_0-release
> > compiles cleanly, which is the first time that's happened on this machine
> > unde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
--- Comment #10 from Joshua Kinard ---
Created attachment 43166
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43166&action=edit
genrecog.ii temp data from failing build command
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
--- Comment #11 from Joshua Kinard ---
(In reply to Joshua Kinard from comment #10)
> Created attachment 43166 [details]
> genrecog.ii temp data from failing build command
Forgot to add, this is generated from a checkout of commit id 1998c023a3e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83864
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jan 18 07:54:17 2018
New Revision: 256837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-17 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/83864
*
201 - 215 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
