https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83662
--- Comment #1 from Nicolai Josuttis ---
Jonathan commented:
> Ah yes, we already have autoconf macros to detect the presence of
> ::aligned_alloc() so adding the using-directive to namespace std should
> be easy.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83662
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just to make sure what options are you using to compile the program?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83662
--- Comment #3 from Nicolai Josuttis ---
See for example here:
https://wandbox.org/permlink/aOV13KmAUMKzSmxz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
MEM_REF (as opposed to TARGET_MEM_REF) should be able to handle any simple
SSA_NAME + CONSTANT_OFFSET which are all we're really concerned with here. THe
target's addressing modes don't really enter the pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83659
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83659
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83659
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like using unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT offset in /* ((foo*)&vectorfoo)[1] =>
BIT_FIELD_REF */ in cxx_fold_indirect_ref would help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #15 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #14)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #12)
> > > (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> > > [...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Petr Špaček from comment #19)
> Sure, I would be happy with any version, thank you!
>
> For people who want to generate code coverage reports for parallel
> executions, beware of https://github.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83594
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Jan 3 09:24:40 2018
New Revision: 256167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256167&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle noipa attribute in IPA visibility (PR ipa/83594).
2018-01-03 Mart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83663
Bug ID: 83663
Summary: [8 regression] aarch64_be regressions after r255946
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926
--- Comment #37 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 43011
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43011&action=edit
alternative patch for comparison failure with /bin/as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83639
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector#Iterator_invalidation
and http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector/push_back
You also need to read https://stackoverflow.com/questions/228783
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926
--- Comment #38 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
> Note that dwarf2out.c causes the section to be emitted via
>
> static void
> dwarf2out_assembly_start (void)
> {
> #ifndef DWARF2_LINENO_DEBU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83663
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83594
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> > > --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c(revision 255700)
> > > +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c(working copy)
> > > @@ -11095,7 +11095,8 @@ rs6000_discover_homogeneous_aggregate (m
> > > homoge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83664
Bug ID: 83664
Summary: Eoshift accepts missing boundary for non-default types
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82352
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43012
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43012&action=edit
Untested patch
Can you please the patch for original test-case? Not the reduced one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42563|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #45 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #43 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>>
>> --- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83665
Bug ID: 83665
Summary: [8 regression] Big code size regression and some code
quality improvement at Jan 2 2018
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83665
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83619
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83664
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83664
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jan 3 11:31:20 2018
New Revision: 256171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256171&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/83664
* check.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83664
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83665
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
One potential candidate is the ipa-inline big_speedup_p fix by Richard. It
does not seem to explain all the difference though. I have quickly checked that
it does affect gzip LTO binary, but less than reported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83649
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jan 3 11:46:38 2018
New Revision: 256172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256172&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgfortran/83649 Chunk large reads and writes
Backport from trunk.
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83666
Bug ID: 83666
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: SIGFPE with -O2 -g
--param=sccvn-max-scc-size=10
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83632
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83649
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jan 3 12:08:05 2018
New Revision: 256173
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256173&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgfortran/83649 Chunk large reads and writes
Backport from trunk.
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83649
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83634
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 12:16:13 2018
New Revision: 256174
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256174&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83634
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold) : If the operand fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83602
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 12:17:05 2018
New Revision: 256175
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256175&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/83602
* name-lookup.c (lookup_name_fuzzy):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83667
Bug ID: 83667
Summary: ICE in dump_function_decl on a thunk with variadic
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Btw. how did you Jakub get the error?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83667
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83668
Bug ID: 83668
Summary: [8 Regression] wrong code with -O
-fno-tree-dominator-opts -fgraphite-identity
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With current trunk:
$ ./cc1plus -quiet pr83549.C
$ ./cc1plus -quiet pr83549.C -O1
pr83549.C:4:4: error: generic thunk code fails for method ‘virtual void
C::_ZThn8_N1C3fooEz(...)’ which uses ‘...’
C c;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> With current trunk:
>
> $ ./cc1plus -quiet pr83549.C
> $ ./cc1plus -quiet pr83549.C -O1
> pr83549.C:4:4: error: generic thunk code fails for method ‘virtual void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It was reported to us in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1511021 that way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82352
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> Can you please the patch for original test-case? Not the reduced one?
Can you please test the patch for original test-case? Not the reduced one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> It was reported to us in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1511021 that way.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83669
Bug ID: 83669
Summary: Add version info to intermediate gcov file
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83669
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83592
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 3 13:30:00 2018
New Revision: 256176
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256176&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83592
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Don't warn abou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83592
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83632
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Nope, the bug is older, that was just when the test was added.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83375
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> I thought there was already a bug for this, but can't find it right now.
>
You maybe confused that with the issue abould global asm statements that go to
a random partition and cause issues with LTO?
In t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82439
--- Comment #5 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00139.html
,
||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
||ains.de
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Huber ---
ICE still exists with GCC 659f92d1990e0b84a6e30f6ecd76319552faf7b7 (20180103).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Jan 3 14:15:58 2018
New Revision: 256177
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256177&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not inline variadic thunks (PR ipa/83549).
2018-01-03 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83670
Bug ID: 83670
Summary: m32c ICE in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4368
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83621
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83666
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|powe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Also fails with -mcpu=power6 -maltivec.
Also succeeds with -mcpu=power9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83634
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Actually with -std=c++11 it started to ICE way before that. Checking...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Likely started with
r181118: PR c++/45114 - Support C++11 alias-declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83645
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
--- Comment #18 from Florin Iucha ---
Even this version creates a warning:
#include
struct foo
{
unsigned bar: 30;
unsigned fill: 2;
};
struct foo test(uint32_t value)
{
struct foo foo;
foo.bar = (value >> 2) & 0x3fffU;
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83593
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Jan 3 14:53:39 2018
New Revision: 256178
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256178&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Clean-up EH after strlen transformation (PR tree-optimization/83593).
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83593
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81933
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
The c++17/c++14 difference lies in:
4321 if (cxx_dialect >= cxx17 && !BINFO_VIRTUAL_P (binfo))
4322 {
4323 tree decl = build_base_field_1 (t, basetype, next_field);
4324 DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83645
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43017
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43017&action=edit
gcc8-pr83645.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82249
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Buch ---
Bug is still present in trunk.
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20180103 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83621
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
C
lease submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20180103 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc*-*-*
--- Comment #3 from Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83621
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 43018
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43018&action=edit
Candidate patch
I'm testing the attached fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82439
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> "(x | y) == x" is simpler than "(y & ~x) == 0" on the tree level. 2 gimple
> vs 3.
We do indeed tend to use the number of stmts to chose canonical forms on
gimple,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83667
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Jan 3 16:01:31 2018
New Revision: 256179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/83667] Fix tree_dump ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83667
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83621
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43019
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43019&action=edit
gcc8-pr83621.patch
Untested patch for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
--- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Wed Jan 3 16:07:32 2018
New Revision: 256180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256180&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-03 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Jan 3 16:26:49 2018
New Revision: 256181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83501 - strlen(a) not folded after strcpy(a, "...")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
template int Foo (T);
template class TPL;
template
constexpr TPL Foo (); // #1
template
constexpr TPL Foo (); // #2
What I think is happening is that the definition at #1 changes the overload set
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83629
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83579
Bug ID: 83579
Summary: Wrong constant folding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83569
Bug ID: 83569
Summary: Wrong constant folding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #5)
> template int Foo (T);
>
> template class TPL;
>
> template
> constexpr TPL Foo (); // #1
>
> template
> constexpr TPL Foo (); // #2
>
> What I think is h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83586
--- Comment #2 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Created attachment 43020
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43020&action=edit
preprocessed file
Here is the same issue on a smaller file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83585
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83586
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 regression] Invalid |[8 regression] Invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61638
dank at kegel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dank at kegel dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83585
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with my r254989 aka PR82718 fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
int Foo (void *);
template class TPL;
template TPL Baz ();
int Foo (float);
template TPL Baz ();
constexpr int Foo (int) {return 0;}int Foo (int);
A less templatey case.
83529.ii:6:26: error: call t
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
