https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||nvptx
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab ---
-pedantic is not designed to reject all programs that are not strictly
conforming, but to enable emitting all _required_ diagnostics. I don't think a
conversion between function and object pointer type req
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83597
Bug ID: 83597
Summary: Compilation error reg multiple declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80555
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Dec 27 09:30:14 2017
New Revision: 256009
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256009&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Assign result of get_string_lenth to a SSA_NAME (PR tree-optimization/8355
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[7/8 Regression] I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83597
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83594
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83593
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83595
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80555
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> AFAICT this is fixed on trunk, likely revision r255542.
>
> Any plan to back port the commit?
The patch applies cleanly to gcc-7, so I'll run a regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598
Bug ID: 83598
Summary: std::basic_regex C++14 conformance issue: resulting
flags != passed flags
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83599
Bug ID: 83599
Summary: [GCOV] A If TRUE statement lead the return statement
has wrong number of execution in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600
Bug ID: 83600
Summary: std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: iterators
not equal
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80555
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #8)
> > I'll defer to Joseph or any other C FE maintainers to make the final call.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83601
Bug ID: 83601
Summary: std::regex_replace C++14 conformance issue: escaping
in SED mode
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> May be a duplicate of or similar to pr78983.
While the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-12/msg00099.html fixes
pr78983 (AFAICT), this PR is only partially fixed by the patch
% gfc -c pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
AFAICT this PR is fixed by the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-12/msg00099.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
One another test-case with a bit different back-trace:
$ g++ /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p789a.C
/dev/null -Wsuggest-final-types -Ofast
during IPA pass: devirt
/home/marxi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83553
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] compiler |[6 Regression] compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83602
Bug ID: 83602
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in
cpp_macro_definition_location(cpp_hashnode*) on
invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83603
Bug ID: 83603
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in builtin_memref at
gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:238
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83603
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
And one another test-case with a bit different back-trace:
$ cat ice.c
char *a, *b;
void c () { __builtin_strncat (a, b, -1); }
$ gcc ice.c -Os -Wrestrict
during GIMPLE pass: wrestrict
ice.c: In function ‘c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83603
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
And:
$ gcc
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-4.c -O1
-c -Wrestrict
...
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-4.c:384:6:
internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604
Bug ID: 83604
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at
explow.c:630
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83599
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83605
Bug ID: 83605
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead
STMT in EH table)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83573
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 Regression] invalid |[6/7/8 Regression] invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I actually see a different ICE on sse-13.c without any command line options,
reduced into:
typedef short V __attribute__((__vector_size__(64)));
__attribute__((target ("avx512vbmi2"))) V
foo (V x, V y, V z)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42973
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42973&action=edit
gcc8-pr83604.patch
Untested fix for that ICE (plus lots of formatting fixes). VPSHRDW is still
wrong, will fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
--- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries ---
Rewriting the test-case like this triggers the ICE without -Wreturn-type being
active:
...
/* { dg-do run { target openacc_nvidia_accel_selected } } */
/* This code uses nvptx inline assembly guarded with acc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
--- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries ---
Tentative patch:
...
diff --git a/gcc/lto-cgraph.c b/gcc/lto-cgraph.c
index ed3df15b143..de5655abbb6 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-cgraph.c
+++ b/gcc/lto-cgraph.c
@@ -,6 +,16 @@ output_offload_tables (void)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096
--- Comment #5 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As far as I can see, the function expand_atomic_compare_and_swap() calls
emit_store_flag_force() with a explicit VOIDmode and because of this,
do_compare_rtx_and_jump() fails to split the instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
--- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 42974
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42974&action=edit
Tentative patch with testcase
Currently doing:
- bootstrap and reg test on x86_64, and
- build & libgomp regtes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83092
--- Comment #3 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: lkrupp
Date: Wed Dec 27 19:20:12 2017
New Revision: 256011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017_12_27 Louis Krupp
PR fortran/83092
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This was changed by https://wg21.link/lwg2306
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 27 19:43:33 2017
New Revision: 256012
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256012&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83538 fix std::match_results::reference (LWG 2306)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83092
lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 27 22:18:02 2017
New Revision: 256013
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256013&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83598 don't modify flags passed to std::basic_regex construc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 27 22:18:08 2017
New Revision: 256014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83600 fix end iterator for unready std::match_results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83601
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Testing has revealed that the alternative complementary candidate patch
introduces a number of regressions, in tests intended specifically to detect
this kind of problem. I don't see an easy way to delay
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: damian at sourceryinstitute dot org
Target Milestone: ---
The commands below use MPICH 3.2 installed by GCC 8 trunk dated 20171227.
Alternatively, the code can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57717
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606
--- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson ---
Is this a duplicate of Bug #81773?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565
--- Comment #21 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #20)
> If nonzero_bits1 isn't changed, then we may need to remove the
> WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS definition in the ia64 port. Unfortunately, I
> don't have access t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83607
Bug ID: 83607
Summary: std::boyer_moore_searcher is slow searching through
arrays of std::byte
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522
--- Comment #9 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Thu Dec 28 05:37:54 2017
New Revision: 256018
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-28 François Dumont
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83587
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83605
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83587
--- Comment #2 from Yibiao Yang ---
Understand. Thanks very much.
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Confirmed, however note that as labels are tricky statement without any
> effect, I assign this very low priority.
61 matches
Mail list logo
