[Bug target/83105] [8 regression] arm-*-*eabihf: error: -mfloat-abi=hard: selected processor lacks an FPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83105 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/81082] [8 Regression] Failure to vectorise after reassociating index computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81082 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15

[Bug rtl-optimization/83500] gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83500 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey --- The test now passes for me.

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/83367] static global constructors stack memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83367 --- Comment #5 from Dale Weiler --- Except they are referenced via their this pointer (which should alias the static storage in that translation unit). I don't see how this is any different than having a static variable in a translation unit and

[Bug testsuite/83131] c-c++/common/attr-nonstring-3 failure for strcmp tests on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83131 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Dec 20 16:56:20 2017 New Revision: 255898 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255898&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/83131 - c-c++/common/attr-nonstring-3 failure for strcmp test

[Bug testsuite/83131] c-c++/common/attr-nonstring-3 failure for strcmp tests on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83131 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78918] missing -Wrestrict on memcpy copying over self

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug testsuite/83483] [8 Regression] gcc.dg/memcpy-6.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/83483] [8 Regression] gcc.dg/memcpy-6.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Dec 20 17:01:24 2017 New Revision: 255899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255899&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/83483 - [8 Regression] gcc.dg/memcpy-6.c FAILs gcc/testsuite

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/80791] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/sms-1.c fail2 starting with r247885

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/82973] [8 regression] ICE in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3896 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82973 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/81611] [8 Regression] gcc un-learned loop / post-increment optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/80791] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/sms-1.c fail2 starting with r247885

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791 --- Comment #10 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9) > Either r160 should be SImode, or we should copy it to a SImode pseudo > and use that instead throughout? Do we want to use it as DImode anywhere?

[Bug rtl-optimization/83513] New: [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 3) in fill_vec_av_set in selective scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83513 Bug ID: 83513 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 3) in fill_vec_av_set in selective scheduler Product

[Bug rtl-optimization/82973] [8 regression] ICE in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3896 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82973 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42935 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42935&action=edit gcc8-pr82973.patch Untested fix. This regressed with r254388 btw, but was just latent everywhere before that.

[Bug tree-optimization/83510] Recent changes for -Warray-bounds trigger false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug target/82989] [7/8 regression ] Inexplicable use of NEON for 64-bit math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug other/83508] [8 regression][arm] c-c++-common/Wrestrict.c fails since r255836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83508 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/83514] New: ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83514 Bug ID: 83514 Summary: ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83515] New: ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 Bug ID: 83515 Summary: ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug ipa/83506] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in force_nonfallthru_and_redirect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 20 19:41:38 2017 New Revision: 255901 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255901&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/83506 * ipa-fnsummary.c (pass_data_ipa_free_fn_summ

[Bug debug/83157] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- Looks like it actually started with r247597, which AFAICT is also a change in how we determine cloning/inlining, so perhaps a latent bug?

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig --- This also does not occur with 20171219. So, my guess would be that this was a side-effect of one of the recent patches, and was fixed in the meantime. I will commit a test case and then close this as FIXED

[Bug middle-end/83516] New: %G interferes with format_warning_at_substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83516 Bug ID: 83516 Summary: %G interferes with format_warning_at_substring Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: midd

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Of course we can't propagate because %esi doesn't have a QImode equivalent. So to back up a little bit. The costing changes twiddled the register assignments. In particular reg93 gets allocated into %esi

[Bug middle-end/83516] %G interferes with format_warning_at_substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83516 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 42936 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42936&action=edit Patch to add %G directives to gimple-ssa-sprintf.c The attached patch for bug 83429 adds the %G directive to gim

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Wed Dec 20 20:36:22 2017 New Revision: 255902 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255902&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-12-20 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/83436 * gfortra

[Bug fortran/83416] [8 Regression] Invalid rejection of association of contiguous pointer to a target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83416 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf --- The lack of IS_CONTIGUOUS is PR45424

[Bug tree-optimization/83517] New: Missed optimization in math expression: (x+x)/x == 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83517 Bug ID: 83517 Summary: Missed optimization in math expression: (x+x)/x == 2 Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug sanitizer/83356] [7 Regression] excessive stack usage compiling with -O2 -fsanitize=bounds -fsanitize=object-size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83356 --- Comment #10 from Arnd Bergmann --- I sent a (rather crude) workaround to the kernel mailing list now, mainly to get the crypto maintainers involved in this as well. I also did further testing and found that in the entire kernel, this is the o

[Bug tree-optimization/83518] New: Missing optimization: useless instructions should be dropped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518 Bug ID: 83518 Summary: Missing optimization: useless instructions should be dropped Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/82522] std::map::insert(value_type &&) not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522 --- Comment #8 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Wed Dec 20 21:53:25 2017 New Revision: 255904 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255904&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-12-20 François Dumont PR libstdc++/82522 * in

[Bug c++/59800] Compilation with g++ fails when -Ofast -flto is used to compile code using some distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59800 aes368 at cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aes368 at cornell dot edu ---

[Bug tree-optimization/83517] Missed optimization in math expression: (x+x)/x == 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83517 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- (div (mult @0 @1) @1) Maybe we are missing a :c here.

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > How can it have a directive for the system sprintf? GCC should make it possible to format wide ints. There should also be an easy way to use the GCC pretty pri

[Bug target/83514] ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83514 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83514] ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83514 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- > will *always* construct a -march string for the driver ^^ for the compiler proper

[Bug ipa/83506] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in force_nonfallthru_and_redirect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83491] [8 Regression] ICE in execute_cse_reciprocals_1 at gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83491 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Dec 20 23:55:42 2017 New Revision: 255906 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255906&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83491 * tree-ssa-math-opts.c (execute_

[Bug tree-optimization/83491] [8 Regression] ICE in execute_cse_reciprocals_1 at gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83491 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- One thought would be to realize that the copy/extend sequence seen in this case is special. It's going to be used when the input for the extension can't be used in an extension (ie %esi in this case). ie,

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83519] New: missing -Wrestrict on an overlapping strcpy to a non-member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83519 Bug ID: 83519 Summary: missing -Wrestrict on an overlapping strcpy to a non-member array Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/78450] strlen(s) return value can be assumed to be less than the size of s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78450 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 81385 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/81385] missing optimization involving strlen of arrays of known size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81385 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83501] [8 Regression] strlen(a) not folded after strcpy(a, "...")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug bootstrap/83284] bootstrap comparison failure in libiberty/stack-limit.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83284 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/80271] Support environment variable CLICOLOR_FORCE to enable -fdiagnostics-color

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80271 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/65673] Compound literal with initializer for zero-sized array drops other initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65673 --- Comment #4 from Alexey Neyman --- Any chance of this patch getting applied?

[Bug debug/83419] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/83520] New: format string bug in libvtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83520 Bug ID: 83520 Summary: format string bug in libvtv Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Ass

[Bug rtl-optimization/83398] [8 Regression] ICE: in try_ready, at haifa-sched.c:7524 with -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83398 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83521] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid operand in unary operation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521 Bug ID: 83521 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid operand in unary operation) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywor

[Bug rtl-optimization/79405] [8 Regression] Infinite loop in fwprop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79405 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/79224] [7/8 Regression] Large C-Ray slowdown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79224 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/82764] [7/8 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5030

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug target/82666] [7/8 regression]: sum += (x>128 ? x : 0) puts the cmov on the critical path (at -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82666 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com See Als

[Bug fortran/83522] New: gfortran is sometimes confused between what is an element range and what is a character range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83522 Bug ID: 83522 Summary: gfortran is sometimes confused between what is an element range and what is a character range Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83523] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523 Bug ID: 83523 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED K

<    1   2