https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506
Bug ID: 83506
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in
force_nonfallthru_and_redirect
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
Ryan Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at ryandesign dot com
--- Comment #47
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83505
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82404
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Dec 20 08:50:56 2017
New Revision: 255851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255851&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add two test-cases for (PR middle-end/82404).
2017-12-20 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
It's still failing at r255848.
My configure flags contain:
--target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi --enable-checking
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-float=soft --enable-build-with-cxx
--with-mode=arm --wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
I filed this bug report after I bisected, so the regression I saw was caused by
r254379.
It's still present with r255848.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83490
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 20 09:12:09 2017
New Revision: 255852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83490
* calls.c (compute_argument_addresses): Ignor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83504
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83500
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83499
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506
--- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry for the breakage, I will take a look.
Regards,
Prathamesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83494
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Dec 20 09:29:13 2017
New Revision: 255853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumber being NU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83481
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83494
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83475
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83459
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83398
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83500
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83380
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58598
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.0, 7.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507
Bug ID: 83507
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in internal_dfa_insn_code_* for
powerpc targets
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83508
Bug ID: 83508
Summary: [8 regression][arm] c-c++-common/Wrestrict.c fails
since r255836
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83409
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #1 from Arnd Bergmann ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83105
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Wed Dec 20 10:30:00 2017
New Revision: 255858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/83105: Minor change of default CPU for arm-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83105
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Fixed. We now select ARM10E as the default CPU when --with-float={hard,softfp}
is specified.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, I guess the real bug is that ipa_free_fn_summary (); is no longer
called for -fno-ipa-pure-const. While the ipa_inline pass had unconditional
gate and so it was freed always if !flag_wpa, ipa-pure-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506
--- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Though, I guess the real bug is that ipa_free_fn_summary (); is no longer
> called for -fno-ipa-pure-const. While the ipa_inline pass had unco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83506
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Does arm-none-eabi imply -ffreestanding or something similar? The testcase
> certainly completely fails with -ffreestanding on x86_64-linux.
No. But it's no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092
Ryan Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at ryandesign dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83494
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
*** Bug 83494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
[...]
> It's still present with r255848.
Same on sparc-sun-solaris2* as of r255834.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83367
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #1 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
The reason of this ICE is not in CET implementation itself, it's an induced
error. The actual reason is in keeping isa bits. There are two different flags
to keep ISA bits (for i386): x86_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #2 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Created attachment 42930
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42930&action=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
Bug ID: 83509
Summary: gcov-dump-8 unable to dump any gcda files
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83331
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83313
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Working on a patch that moves HLE, MOVBE, CLZERO and MWAITX to isa_flags2 and
VBMI2 and SHSTK to isa_flags. The rule of thumb is that if some isa mask
option appears with |, then either all the ored options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So before the change, ivotps dump is like:
[15.00%]:
_15 = (unsigned int) m_8(D);
ivtmp.10_16 = _15 * 8;
[100.00%]:
# i_5 = PHI
# sh_6 = PHI <256(2), sh_10(4)>
# ivtmp.10_18 = PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83313
--- Comment #2 from Jean-Michaël Celerier ---
@Martin Liška I'm using the default arch linux toolchain which is reasonably
up-to-date AFAIK:
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 7.2.1 20171128
$ ld.gold --version
GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83213
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2017-12-20
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
And please provide also gcno file corresponding to the gcda file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83313
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Thanks. And is the software publicly available so that one can build it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So dump of optimized pass is:
;; Function f (f, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=2557, cgraph_uid=0, symbol_order=1)
Removing basic block 5
__attribute__((noinline))
f (int m)
{
int sh;
int i;
sizetype
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So whole expanded rtl is:
;;
;; Full RTL generated for this function:
;;
1: NOTE_INSN_DELETED
5: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 2
2: r160:DI=%3:DI
3: NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG
4: r157:DI=0x1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83107
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83144
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42932
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42932&action=edit
gcc8-pr83488.patch
Untested fix. Note I think the patch should also fix -mavx512vbmi2
-mno-avx512f not disabli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The "The patch has a fix for wrong setting of OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512F_SET for
-mavx512vnni option, which has also effect on CET." part of the patch is still
needed, please submit it separately. And if you do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #6 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
I haven't look into all the cases but I think there are similar cases with
OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512F and OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Standard base6 options: -Ofast -funroll-loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83331
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Yeah, that sounds like a reasonable thing to do to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
> Can it be a duplicate of PR83459?
No, this is a separate issue (the root cause here is different from the issue
in sched-pressure ordering heuristic found by Jakub in the other bug).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase for the other ICE fixed by this patch:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-mavx512vbmi2 -mno-avx512f" } */
typedef long long __v8di __attribute__((vector_size (64)));
void
foo (__v8di *a, __v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Even using the affected revision, I'm unable to reproduce that with:
OPTIMIZE= -Ofast -funroll-loops -g -march=haswell -fpermissive
-fgnu89-inline
Can you please provide whole command line that invok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510
Bug ID: 83510
Summary: Recent changes for -Warray-bounds trigger false
positive
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #6)
> I haven't look into all the cases but I think there are similar cases with
> OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512F and OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VL.
Which ones do you mean?
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81055
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle
dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81055
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83511
Bug ID: 83511
Summary: Missing default argument for basic_string_view::substr
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83491
--- Comment #6 from Wilco ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01357.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58598
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512
Bug ID: 83512
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: in df_compact_blocks, at
df-core.c:1729 with -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
I've finally cloned PR82881 as I apparently don't have permissions to reopen
that PR. I'm also adding another similar testcase for the case:
int u3;
int
w7 (int *a9)
{
for (;;)
{
for (*a9 = 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
--- Comment #3 from PeteVine ---
OK, the following command was used to obtain the gcno/gcda files:
$ gcc-8 -O3 -fprofile-generate -ftest-coverage sudoku.c && ./a.out
Unlike the gcda file, gcno is dumpable with gcov-dump-8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
--- Comment #4 from PeteVine ---
Created attachment 42934
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42934&action=edit
corresponding C/gcda/gcno files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80837
Matt Godbolt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #10 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
The bit OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VNNI may have OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VL bit set
also. But these bits are from different isa flags.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83490
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
$ grep 'OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VNNI.*|' i386-builtins.def
$ grep '|.*OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VNNI' i386-builtins.def
So, at least I can't find that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If it is due to a bug in i386-builtins.def, with my patch there are just 60
bits in isa_flags and thus a couple of further isa bits could be moved there if
really needed. And as I said earlier, I think it i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Patch sent: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01361.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And, if we run out of easy move ideas, we could make a copy of the ISA_64BIT so
that we'd have it in both flag sets (and keep it synced) and move all AVX512
related stuff to isa_flags2 and everything else to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #14 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
ok, maybe I was wrong. But my point is OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VL may be used
with new/future instructions likely. This bit is in isa_flags set, which is
full now, so it will require reorde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #15 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> And, if we run out of easy move ideas, we could make a copy of the ISA_64BIT
> so that we'd have it in both flag sets (and keep it synced) a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #84 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 20 14:48:34 2017
New Revision: 255895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255895&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[SFN] debug markers before labels no more
Make sure that gimple and R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Dec 20 15:07:01 2017
New Revision: 255896
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255896&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH, PR83492] Fix selection of aarch64 big-endian shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] Optimized |[7 Regression] Optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Well, this seems to fix it.
--- a/gcc/stor-layout.c
+++ b/gcc/stor-layout.c
@@ -1882,6 +1882,12 @@ finalize_type_size (tree type)
/* Handle empty records as per the x86-64 psABI. */
TYPE_EMPTY_P (typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83504
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
