https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #15 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Thanks Oleg!
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #14)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #13)
> Cache line sizes of original SH implementations:
>
> SH2,SH2A,SH3: 16 bytes
>
libunwind-exceptions
--enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-linker-build-id
--with-linker-hash-style=gnu --enable-plugin --enable-initfini-array --with-isl
--enable-libmpx --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --without-cuda-driver
--enable-gnu-indirect-function --with-tune=native
Thread model: posix
gcc ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83121
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Just to be clear: the attached testcase triggers the ICE both on
X86_64 and ppc64le.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
Bug ID: 83446
Summary: [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on i686
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83447
Bug ID: 83447
Summary: parameter after function parameter pack gets
improperly deduced
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83442
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Program is stuck in a loop which repeatedly calls $$dyncall:
(gdb) bt
#0 $$dyncall () at ../../../gcc/libgcc/config/pa/milli64.S:237
#1 0x0055b82c in try_init_one_plugin (plugin=0xfae140)
at ../../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
Bug ID: 83448
Summary: ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at
input.c:1507
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
This problem has existed since before revision 249397.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68643
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #16 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
As for ioctl():
Linux: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/ioctl.2.html
FreeBSD: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ioctl&sektion=2
Plan9:
https://github.com/brho/plan9/blob/master/sys/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71641
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Last reconf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-11-01 00:00:00 |2017-12-17
--- Comment #2 from John
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83449
Bug ID: 83449
Summary: incorrect ## preprocessing with string
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preproce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83449
--- Comment #1 from Asif ---
g++ main.cpp
main.cpp:10:15: error: pasting ""a"" and ""b"" does not give a valid
preprocessing token
char *i=A("a","b");
^
main.cpp:6:16: note: in definition of macro ‘A’
#define A(a,b) a ## b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83449
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC is correct here. Strings don't paste together.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16275
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asif_bahrainwala at hotmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83450
Bug ID: 83450
Summary: FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/pthread18185.cc (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83451
Bug ID: 83451
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_10.f90 -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops
-ftracer -finline-functions (ICE)
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83451
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
The subreg is strange.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #17 from T B ---
Okay, sorry.
Thanks for your efforts!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83451
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Similar fails:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_10.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/matmul_10.f90 -O3 -fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452
Bug ID: 83452
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83453
Bug ID: 83453
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/Wattributes.c -std=gnu++98 (test
for warnings, line 404)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
More similar fails:
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101010-4 cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o-cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o link,
-std=c++0x -flto -g -r -nostdlib
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20101010-4 cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o-cp_lto_2010101
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83454
Bug ID: 83454
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cswtch-4.c and cswtch-5.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77734
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Also on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10)
> Author: redi
> Date: Thu Dec 14 21:49:03 2017
> New Revision: 255666
#ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_SENDFILE
- off_t offset = 0;
- const auto n = ::sendfile(out.fd, in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83455
Bug ID: 83455
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-22.c (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456
Bug ID: 83456
Summary: -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy
in an inline function
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
It's an unintended effect of warning during folding. The folder sees the
arguments propagated before the if conditional has been evaluated and before
the call has been eliminated as unreachable. The only way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83453
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83453
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Caused by r255469 (the test was added belatedly, in r27).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83443
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83443
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
r247448 build was okay while 247726 shows the two failures. I think this
implies the failures were introduced
by r247444:
2017-05-01 Martin Sebor
* tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #3 from Martin Seb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Actually we should just drop the libgo/go/exp directory. I don't know why it's
still there. It should have been dropped years ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Dec 18 03:31:05 2017
New Revision: 255772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255772&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/83446 - Bootstrap failed on i686
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83361
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
Should this PR be closed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83361
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
No, it probably needs backports.
try_ready, at haifa-sched.c:7524
}
^
0x1431e02 try_ready(rtx_insn*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20171217/work/gcc-8-20171217/gcc/haifa-sched.c:7520
0x14ac529 init_ready_list
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20171217/work/gcc-8-20171217/gcc/sched-ebb.c:
47 matches
Mail list logo