https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327
Bug ID: 83327
Summary: Spilling into hard regs not taken into account in lra
liveness analysis
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
Bug ID: 83328
Summary: string.insert does not return a iterator when using
initializer lists
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83321
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
It makes no sense:
==23914== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==23914==at 0x10C8165: improve_allocation() (ira-color.c:2820)
==23914==by 0x10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83329
Bug ID: 83329
Summary: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_store, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:6327
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330
Bug ID: 83330
Summary: [7/8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack
for SSE register with -mno-push-args
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83319
Ethan Gutmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gutmann at ucar dot edu
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 42817
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42817&action=edit
Demonstrator patch
Using this demonstrator patch, I managed to fix the failure and run the
test-case successfull
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657
--- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to mpf from comment #11)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #10)
> > Meaning that this PR may still occur for the other archs that define the
> > target hook: mips and arc.
> >
> > Shouldn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I guess include/debug/string should be adjusted too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83323
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixing it is an ABI change, so it's not that simple.
It should also have a const_iterator parameter, not iterator, and needs to be
fixed for both std::string implementations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83317
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebotcazou at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83331
Bug ID: 83331
Summary: Compile time evaluation of cbrt does not match library
evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83329
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
Bisecting revealed that the first bad revision is Honza's r255268, but since
that is just a cost adjustment, it seems it has just revealed a pre-existing
latent bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 8, 2017 4:56:12 PM GMT+01:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631
>
>Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83332
Bug ID: 83332
Summary: [8 regression] new test case
gfortran.dg/vect/pr81303.f fails (r255499)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Bug ID: 8
Summary: Incorrect demangling of lambda destructors
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: dema
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83334
Bug ID: 83334
Summary: __builtin_ms_va_copy used in function with sysv_abi is
broken
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Related to PR81179 and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02054.html
As the patch doesn't apply cleanly, can't easily verify it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61428
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83317
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Eric, I think the patch caused the problem was intended for asm insns but it
actually works on any insn.
I guess constraining the original patch to asms could be a solution. I can
make a patch and after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81595
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 8 19:05:56 2017
New Revision: 255516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255516&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/81595
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr81595.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81595
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83335
Bug ID: 83335
Summary: [8 regression][aarch64,ilp32]
gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c ICEs since 255481
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81303
--- Comment #15 from Pat Haugen ---
Just confirming that the changes have eliminated the bwaves degradation on
PowerPC that started with r249919.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83317
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I guess constraining the original patch to asms could be a solution. I can
> make a patch and after testing will commit it if it is ok with you.
>
> Something like
>
> Index: lra-constraints.c
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81288
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79415
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83177
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82983
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70276
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83336
Bug ID: 83336
Summary: Issues with displaying inlining chain for middle-end
warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
8.0.0 20171208 (experimental) [trunk revision 255516] (GCC)
$
$ gcctk -O2 -c small.c
$ gcc-7.2.0 -O3 -c small.c
$
$ gcctk -O3 -c small.c
during GIMPLE pass: linterchange
small.c: In function ‘j’:
small.c:9:6: internal compiler error: in interpret_rhs_expr, at
tree-scalar-evolution.c:1775
void j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83336
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
