https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83069
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #2)
> The specific revision this starts failing with is 254888.
This is r254888.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83110
Bug ID: 83110
Summary: Relocation error when taking address of protected
function in shared library.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83111
Bug ID: 83111
Summary: [sh] stack smashing detected in gen_udivsi3
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83104
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Nov 22 16:44:46 2017
New Revision: 255068
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255068&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Avoid two_valued_val_range_p for pointers.
2017-11-22 Marc Glisse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80711
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
There is a warning like that in the middle-end: -Wsuggest-attribute=pure.
Unfortunately, it's only good for functions that are actually emitted (i.e.,
not for C++ inline functions).
$ cat t.C && gcc -O2 -S -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83111
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82907
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love ---
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83111
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83106
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
If you already know strlen (d) you can use strcpy or memcpy instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83112
Bug ID: 83112
Summary: Silence warnings from PowerPC libgcc float128-ifunc.c
compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82190
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83112
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83104
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113
Bug ID: 83113
Summary: Bogus "duplicate allocatable attribute" error for
submodule character function
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83095
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83111
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
By reverting the patch, I was able to finish the build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82253
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83100
--- Comment #3 from James Clarke ---
With the same example, I can reproduce on aarch64, armel, powerpc, ppc64 and
ppc64el.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82674
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83016
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83016
--- Comment #9 from simon at pushface dot org ---
errm - I think I need to rebuild the host compiler so I get the proper gnatlink
to rebuild the cross compiler. Sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81228
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83114
Bug ID: 83114
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in gen_vec_cmpv2dfv2di, at
config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md:2495
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83114
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83097
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Nov 22 19:19:13 2017
New Revision: 255072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 83097 Use __BYTE_ORDER__ predefined macro instead of runtime check
By u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83097
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83030
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|gcov-profile|rtl-optimization
--- Comment #5 from Eri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #19 from Neil Carlson ---
This fixes the code of comment 12 for me. All the other test cases continue to
work as expected. This can be closed as "fixed" as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks Paul!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83016
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> errm - I think I need to rebuild the host compiler so I get the proper
> gnatlink to rebuild the cross compiler. Sorry.
See also PR ada/81878.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83115
Bug ID: 83115
Summary: Capturing the local variable/function parameter by
value generates an compilation error
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83115
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Kolesov ---
The error we can see:
prog.cc: In function 'void doSomething(double)':
prog.cc:6:44: error: 'value' was not declared in this scope
[ now = std::chrono::system_clock::now(), value]{}();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83074
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Vargyas ---
>
> libc.so.6 is a shared library, not a PIE. It is normally linked with -shared,
> just arranged to have .interp section and a meaningful e_entry in Ehdr.
> PIE is something significantly different, in pa
or body gives correct code - this is stripped version,
originally there was assert(this->size() >= 0);
UBSAN gives no results.
This bug occurs also on 6.1.0, 6.2.0, 6.3.0, 7.1.0, 7.2.0 and today's trunk
(8.0.0 20171122), as tested on compiler explorer: https://godbolt.org/g/hr4Nq4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62170
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 22 20:37:58 2017
New Revision: 255076
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255076&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C/C++: fix quoting of "aka" typedef information (PR 62170)
PR 62170 de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62170
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83106
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 22 20:49:56 2017
New Revision: 255080
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255080&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/83106
* target.c (gomp_target_init): Compute le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83117
Bug ID: 83117
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv/ms-sysv.c (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83117
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82583
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 22 21:12:36 2017
New Revision: 255082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
jit: update test suite for change to -Warray-bounds
jit.dg/test-error-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 22 21:12:36 2017
New Revision: 255082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
jit: update test suite for change to -Warray-bounds
jit.dg/test-error-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82392
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Test case for the fact that we don't align, or that this
causes a performance loss?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83030
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Nov 22 21:43:22 2017
New Revision: 255083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/83030
* doc/rtl.texi (Flags in an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83030
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozefl.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comm
with version 8.0 when the dynamic type is
CHARACTER.
Version 6.4.1 gives the expected result:
orig=["foo","bar"]
copy=["foo","bar"]
But 8.0 (20171122) gives an incorrect result:
orig=["foo","bar"]
copy=["foo","b"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
--- Comment #1 from Neil Carlson ---
Note that the incorrect string "b" is not actually 1 character long, but 3
characters: a "b" followed by 2 non-printing characters. Vim shows them as ^@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82401
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 22 22:35:52 2017
New Revision: 255084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82401
* name-lookup.c (member_name_cmp): Return 0 i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80717
Bartłomiej Piotrowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bpiotrowski at archlinux dot
org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83106
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407
Bug 82407 depends on bug 82401, which changed state.
Bug 82401 Summary: [8 Regression] error: qsort comparator non-negative on
sorted output: 1 in insert_late_enum_def_bindings on an invalid code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82401
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82401
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
types -Wold-style-definition -std=gnu11 -version
-fgnu89-inline -fmerge-all-constants -fno-stack-protector -frounding-math -fpic
-o fetch-value.s
GNU C11 (GCC) version 8.0.0 20171122 (experimental) (powerpc64-linux)
compiled by GNU C version 8.0.0 20171122 (experimental), GMP version
6.0.0, MPFR v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83120
Bug ID: 83120
Summary: [8 Regression] ext/special_functions/hyperg failure on
AIX
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83120
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83111
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83119
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83104
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83121
Bug ID: 83121
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: in linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at
libcpp/line-map.c:995
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
Andrew Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrewm.roberts at sky dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Roberts ---
I've been testing on a Ryzen system and also comparing with Haswell and
Skylake. From my testing -mtune=znver1 does not perform well and never has,
including as of last snapshot:
gcc version 8.0.0 20171119 (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Roberts ---
Created attachment 42687
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42687&action=edit
Test program used for the attached performance results (matrix.c)
Test program used for the attached performan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Roberts ---
Created attachment 42688
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42688&action=edit
Test results for Ryzen system with matrix.c
Test results for Ryzen system with matrix.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Roberts ---
Created attachment 42689
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42689&action=edit
Test results for Haswell system with matrix.c
Test results for Haswell system with matrix.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Roberts ---
Created attachment 42690
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42690&action=edit
Test results for Skylake system with matrix.c
Test results for Skylake system with matrix.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Roberts ---
Created attachment 42691
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42691&action=edit
Script for matrix.c test program
Script for matrix.c test program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
101 - 169 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
