https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82020
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Nov 20 08:20:35 2017
New Revision: 254944
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254944&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix comparison mode in simplify_ternary_operation
2017-11-20 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
>
> --- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Author: hubicka
> Date: Sun Nov 19 18:55:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82020
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83059
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83041
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83063
Bug ID: 83063
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on an invalid preprocessor snippet
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82852
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Yeah, seems like it`s gone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82851
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82852
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Sorry, started with r254937.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82180
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcy at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83053
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I see in tree-vrp.c:4804:
(gdb) p print_generic_expr(stderr, ref, 0)
*array.0_159[0]$10 = void
(gdb) p debug_tree(ref)
unit-size
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set 8 canonical-t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83045
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83044
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82180
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 42656
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42656&action=edit
Tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|ICE on C++ code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064
Bug ID: 83064
Summary: DO CONCURRENT inconsistent results
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
>
> Jan Hubicka changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83040
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83061
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Well, the warnings are false positives given the uses are guarded with an error
check (that can never trigger due to implementation details).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83047
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83047
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42657&action=edit
gcc8-pr83047.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065
Bug ID: 83065
Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 523/623 compfail (ICE)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6023
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
CC|klaus.kretsch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Nov 20 09:55:02 2017
New Revision: 254946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/83062
* ipa-inline.c (can_inline_edge_p): Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 20 10:10:23 2017
New Revision: 254948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254948&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78821
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83045
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83044
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83053
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Terbium however now fails with
In file included from
/gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/libgcc/config/ia64/unwind-ia64.c:2448:
/gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/libgcc/unwind.inc: In function
'_Unwind_Resume_or_Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83066
Bug ID: 83066
Summary: [8 regression] 26_numerics/gcd/gcd_neg.cc fails since
r254736
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55826
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Related to PR82872?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83061
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Hm, even with the latest patch, the testcase from comment #5:
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
void baz (char *buf, unsigned int data)
{
buf[0] = data;
buf[1] = data >> 8;
buf[2] = ~data >> 8;
buf[3] =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #5 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Created attachment 42658
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42658&action=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> ... starting with r254437 "Instrument function exit with
> __builtin_unreachable in C++".
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> inp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Maybe related to bswap optimization is also:
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
void baz (char *buf, unsigned int data)
{
buf[0] = data >> 8;
buf[1] = data;
}
which currently generates (-O2 -march=haswell)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #6 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Andreas has sent this issue as a reply to my commit. I proposed a fix and asked
for approval. Here is my reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01647.html
I have attached th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83063
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|Debug make check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83059
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42659
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42659&action=edit
gcc8-pr83059.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81165
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|Regression in GC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #17)
> Hm, even with the latest patch, the testcase from comment #5:
> still compiles to:
>
> movl%esi, %eax
> movw%si, (%rdi)
> notl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83067
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
Note that this issue was found by Yibiao Yang and shqking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83067
Bug ID: 83067
Summary: wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82963
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83067
--- Comment #2 from Yibiao Yang ---
$ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabi/5/lto-wrapper
Target: arm-linux-gnueabi
Configured with: ../src/config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
>
> --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #17)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83066
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83068
Bug ID: 83068
Summary: Suboptimal code generated with -m32 using MMX reg
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83068
--- Comment #1 from Richard Bradfield ---
And as usual I forget to mention these things:
I am compiling everything using gcc trunk, at commit r254929 from Sun Nov 19
This behaviour is not present in GCC 7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> > ... starting with r254437 "Instrument function exit with
> > __builtin_unreachable in C++".
> > Obviously, tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42660&action=edit
gcc8-pr78821-i386.patch
Untested patch for the -mmovbe movbew loads/stores. Note, is there any
particular rea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24222
Bug 24222 depends on bug 26748, which changed state.
Bug 26748 Summary: gimplify_expr_stmt in cp-gimplifer.c does warnings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47256
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #7 from itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: itsimbal
Date: Mon Nov 20 12:30:25 2017
New Revision: 254951
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254951&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/83015
* config/cr16/unwind-cr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50445
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82781
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 20 12:57:50 2017
New Revision: 254952
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254952&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82781
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_vector_conditional_ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #22 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21)
> Created attachment 42660 [details]
> gcc8-pr78821-i386.patch
>
> Untested patch for the -mmovbe movbew loads/stores. Note, is there any
> particular reason why
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83050
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83049
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
In general GCC tries to avoid adding language extensions until they have at
least been proposed for addition to the standard, not the other way around.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #22)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21)
> > Created attachment 42660 [details]
> > gcc8-pr78821-i386.patch
> >
> > Untested patch for the -mmovbe movbew loa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #24 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 42661
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42661&action=edit
Add bswaphi2 pattern
What do you think about going through bswaphi2 pattern, as in the attached
patch. Using of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Mon Nov 20 13:26:39 2017
New Revision: 254954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
VRP: x+1 and -x cannot be INT_MIN
2017-11-20 Marc Glisse
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83069
Bug ID: 83069
Summary: [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in
from_gcov_type, at profile-count.h:676
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #25 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23)
> I believe enabled attribute can't depend on
> optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun).
Indeed. Maybe preferred_for_size can come handy here (and in bswaphi_lowpart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83070
Bug ID: 83070
Summary: -Wsign-compare warning in eoshift0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libfort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Comment on attachment 42661
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42661
Add bswaphi2 pattern
[(set (match_operand:HI 0 "register_operand")
Is that so that you don't have to bother with forc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #27 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #26)
> Comment on attachment 42661 [details]
> Add bswaphi2 pattern
>
> [(set (match_operand:HI 0 "register_operand")
>
> Is that so that you don't have to bother wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, let's go with your patch then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
ropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
Fails wth both gccgo 7.2.1 (distributed with Fedora) and
$ go version
go version go1.9 gccgo (GCC) 8.0.0 20171120 (experimental) linux/amd64
which I just built locally.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83048
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
I wonder if we could use a macro like this:
...
#define SAFE_MACRO_STMT(stmt) \
do { \
if (1) \
stmt;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83072
Bug ID: 83072
Summary: Late VRP optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83007
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you Martin for the explanation, I'll fix the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #29 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #24)
> Using of xcgh in place of bswap is suggested by Intel ...
For reference:
http://www.felixcloutier.com/x86/BSWAP.html
specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./gcc/xgcc
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
--disable-multilib --prefix=/home/marxin/bin/gcc --disable-bootstrap
--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/no/where
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171120 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83067
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82960
--- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand ---
I'll have a look. I still need to get my SPU build environment back up and
running, the build currently fails due to unrelated issues.
I remember looking at this a few years back:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
