[Bug c++/81957] ICE decltype

2017-11-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81957 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82818] New: Bad Codegen, delete does not check for nullptrs

2017-11-02 Thread dark_sylinc at yahoo dot com.ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82818 Bug ID: 82818 Summary: Bad Codegen, delete does not check for nullptrs Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/82819] New: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206

2017-11-02 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82819 Bug ID: 82819 Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Key

[Bug c++/82818] Bad Codegen, delete does not check for nullptrs

2017-11-02 Thread dark_sylinc at yahoo dot com.ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82818 --- Comment #1 from dark_sylinc at yahoo dot com.ar --- Update: 1. Confirmed to be broken with gcc 7.2 2. When I said fsanitize; I meant fsanitize=undefined 3. When code is slightly modified as in the new attachment, the crash is gone. But it app

[Bug c++/82818] Bad Codegen, delete does not check for nullptrs

2017-11-02 Thread dark_sylinc at yahoo dot com.ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82818 --- Comment #2 from dark_sylinc at yahoo dot com.ar --- Created attachment 42540 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42540&action=edit Workaround. Uncomment "//a.~FastArray();" to make the crash come back

[Bug target/82820] [arm32]ldm/stm instructions Bus error while running with 64bit kernel

2017-11-02 Thread zwzhangwen.zhang at huawei dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82820 --- Comment #2 from zwzhangwen.zhang at huawei dot com --- Hi, I have a testcase for example: typedef struct structA{ int a; int b; int c; }A; typedef struct structB{ int iData; A a; }B; int test(A aa) { aa.a = 123;

[Bug target/82820] [arm32]ldm/stm instructions Bus error while running with 64bit kernel

2017-11-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82820 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82788] wrong code with -fstack-clash-protection --param=stack-clash-protection-probe-interval=10 on simple code

2017-11-02 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82788 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/82820] New: [arm32]ldm/stm instructions Bus error on AARCH64

2017-11-02 Thread zwzhangwen.zhang at huawei dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82820 Bug ID: 82820 Summary: [arm32]ldm/stm instructions Bus error on AARCH64 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/82820] [arm32]ldm/stm instructions Bus error while running with 64bit kernel

2017-11-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82820 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- ldm/stm should not be used with unaligned memory. Yes it was emulated when using the arm kernel but the arm64 kernel does not emulate them.

<    1   2