https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79402
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Oct 19 17:54:58 2017
New Revision: 253908
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253908&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79402
* resolve.c (fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79402
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82624
Bug ID: 82624
Summary: [msp430] Target must allow for NULL pointer
dereferences
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82624
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should be sent to gcc-patches@.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
On 10/19/17, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> BTW, why --without-pic? What you want to achieve by that?
>
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #32 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Misty De Meo from comment #31)
> For what it's worth, Apple's response was: "We analyzed the issue and
> determined the problem to be a latent bug in gcc’s build system that is
> revealed by chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82620
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597
Michael Collison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.collison at linaro dot
org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82617
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82620
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
So there is another testcase in PR82592.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82617
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The ICE depends on the configuration of the compiler:
with --enable-checking=release, I get
during RTL pass: expand
pr82617.f90:27:0:
items = strwords_impl(str,white)
internal compiler error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82625
Bug ID: 82625
Summary: lower-optimization are not inlined with symbol
multiversioning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81924
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yeah, that looks like a backporting oversight.
I'll have a look after I recover from the post-vacation email slog.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #5 from Marco Castelluccio ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> (In reply to Marco Castelluccio from comment #3)
> > > Thanks for the report Marco. Looks it comes from Firefox, am I right?
> >
> > Yes, that's correct. Act
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597
--- Comment #6 from Michael Collison ---
Yes I am aware of that report. I have a fix that should be sent to gcc-patches
shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82626
Bug ID: 82626
Summary: -msse and -mfpmath=sse Causes __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ to
be -1
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82627
Bug ID: 82627
Summary: [8 regression] r253809 breaks test cases
gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-3.c -7.c, -9.c, and
uns-interchange-9.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82626
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82626
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think a value of 0 should be correct with -mfpmath=sse.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82626
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed by r249731 on trunk and r249956 on gcc-7-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82575
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Oct 19 23:06:20 2017
New Revision: 253914
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253914&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR82575, lto debugobj references __gnu_lto_slim, ld test liblto-17 fails
If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82575
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82598
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171019 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82629
Bug ID: 82629
Summary: OpenMP 4.5 Target Region mangling problem
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80997
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkeir at outlook dot com
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82308
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 20 00:30:41 2017
New Revision: 253920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-19 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/82308
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82308
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82631
Bug ID: 82631
Summary: Bogus DW_AT_GNU_call_site_value
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82630
Bug ID: 82630
Summary: Bogus DW_AT_GNU_call_site_value
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82612
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
I realize there's no ARRAY_REF but users unfamiliar with GCC internals don't,
nor would they care. I'm less concerned about code that defeats the type
system by using casts (though it would be nice to diagnos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82632
Bug ID: 82632
Summary: copy deduction candidate erroneously preferred over
deduction-guide
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242
Pavel Revak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.revak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo