https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82525
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 13 06:59:13 2017
New Revision: 253706
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253706&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82525
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82451
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 13 07:02:55 2017
New Revision: 253707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82451
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82355
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 13 07:02:55 2017
New Revision: 253707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82451
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82498
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 13 07:17:06 2017
New Revision: 253708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253708&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82498
* config/i386/ia32intrin.h (__rold, __ror
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82498
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 13 07:28:46 2017
New Revision: 253709
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253709&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82498
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) : Code c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 13 07:29:51 2017
New Revision: 253710
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253710&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82524
* config/i386/i386.md (addqi_ext_1, andqi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 13 07:39:42 2017
New Revision: 253711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82524
* config/i386/i386.md (addqi_ext_1, andqi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524
--- Comment #19 from Vasilis.Vlachoudis at cern dot ch ---
Just to say thank you guys, amazing :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82539
Bug ID: 82539
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at
gimplify.c:5693
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82539
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82539
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Don't we have a DUP of this already? Any kind of gimplify_expr after initial
gimplification is problematic with -ftrapv.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 82539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82539
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81048
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82499
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Oct 13 10:04:59 2017
New Revision: 253718
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Check red zone size in push peephole2
Check red zone size, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82499
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82540
Bug ID: 82540
Summary: gcc 6.4.0 bootstrap with java core dump in file with
illumos ld
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82451
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 82525, which changed state.
Bug 82525 Summary: [GRAPHITE] codegen error for modulo operations we cannot
represent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82525
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82525
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541
Bug ID: 82541
Summary: Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
Bug ID: 82542
Summary: -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no
longer available for C
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71996
--- Comment #2 from Ben Longbons ---
It's now called -fdump-lang-raw, and for some reason it's only active in C++
mode (filed bug #82542).
But this bug is still present with those changes made.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82435
--- Comment #10 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I get a clean kernel build now with that option, thanks a lot for your help!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82543
Bug ID: 82543
Summary: libbacktrace does not retrieve function names on 64
bit windows (using mingw)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544
Bug ID: 82544
Summary: gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509
--- Comment #3 from Peeter Joot ---
Created attachment 42350
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42350&action=edit
test case used to verify Eric's patch in a gdb session.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82531
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509
--- Comment #4 from Peeter Joot ---
Here's the debug session that shows the compiler+debugger stack playing nicely
together:
(gdb) n
40 int cb = memcmp( &b, &n, sizeof( b ) );
(gdb) p bt
$1 = {v = 3, a = {1, 2, 3, 4}}
(gdb) p b
$2 = {v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544
--- Comment #1 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
DilOS on Intel.
for example: the same codebase of gcc-6.4.0 + illumos ld on Intel is working
fine:
root@z165:/rws1/users/root/du2/components/gcc-6# gccgo-6 -o t hello.go
root@z165:/rws1/users/root/du2/co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544
--- Comment #2 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
forgot to add gcc-6 bootstrap info on DilOS on Intel:
root@z165:/rws1/users/root/du2/components/gcc-6# gcc-6 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-6
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/gcc/6/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-solar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
Bug ID: 82545
Summary: -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838,
during GIMPLE pass sanopt
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivo.raisr at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
--- Comment #2 from Ivo Raisr ---
Created attachment 42352
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42352&action=edit
C-reduced reproducer, not reformatted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
--- Comment #3 from Ivo Raisr ---
$ cat reduced.c
extern void c(int);
extern void d(void);
void a(void) {
{
int b;
&b;
__builtin_setjmp(0);
c(b);
}
d();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
--- Comment #4 from Ivo Raisr ---
The reproducer was C-reduce'd from a large source file (30 MB) which is not
publicly available.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82481
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:39:24 2017
New Revision: 253724
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253724&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/82481 Suppress clang-tidy warnings
PR libstdc++/824
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:39:32 2017
New Revision: 253725
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253725&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/82522 overload map insert functions for rvalues (LWG 2354)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82481
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |7.3
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
additional info by mdb:
igork@bld13:~/builds/igork/du2/components/gcc-6$ mdb core
Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
> $C
7fffd1a1 libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+8(1, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0)
7fffd251 libc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
The call to abort makes this seem more like a problem in the unwind code in
libgcc than a problem with the Go compiler. Can you find out exactly what code
in uw_context_1 is calling abort? Try running th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42353
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42353&action=edit
Neon intrinsics list
This list is the result of the conversion of
https://developer.arm.com/technologies/neon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42354
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42354&action=edit
perl parser
This is a perl script to parse intrinsics.txt and produce a list like:
[...]
v7/A32/A64flo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
I used the perl script and intrinsics list to build several subsets:
# List of duplicates: (a few intrinsics are listed twice
# with different prototypes, it's likely a bug in the documentation,
# not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42355
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42355&action=edit
Full list of intrinsics supported in v7/a32/a64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42356&action=edit
Full list of intrinsics supported in a32/a64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42357&action=edit
Full list of intrinsics supported in a64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #10 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42358
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42358&action=edit
v7 intrinsics not supported by the arm target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42359
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42359&action=edit
a32/a64 intrinsics not supported by the arm target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42360
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42360&action=edit
v7 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42361
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42361&action=edit
a32/a64 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #14 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 42362
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42362&action=edit
a64 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82531
--- Comment #2 from Arturs Zoldners ---
Created attachment 42363
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42363&action=edit
archive of 3 test cases of ICE vs base what compiles
Here are the test cases. The base compiles. 3 other are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82543
--- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin ---
Checked on the trunk version of libbacktrace (r253491)
Issue still exists
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57925
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes it's still open, so a fix would be welcome. Please see
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html if you want to contribute a fix for it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82540
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgcj |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|go |target
Assignee|ian at airs do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82478
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
struct true_type { static const bool value = true; };
struct false_type { static const bool value = false; };
template
using void_t = void;
template
struct HasPrivate
{ static const bool value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01668.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
> Debian and Glibc use it for ABI checking; I and others use it to help generate
> C bindings for my toy language without having to write a C parser for no
> reason
I always have maintained that this is an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
glibc does not use this option. ABI checking in glibc works on binaries
via objdump -T. linknamespace tests do use -aux-info to list functions
exported by a header, and would find it usef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80873
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 13 16:50:13 2017
New Revision: 253733
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253733&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/80873
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80873
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 80873, which changed state.
Bug 80873 Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy when trying to use an overloaded function
without a definition in a lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80873
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82546
Bug ID: 82546
Summary: tree_size handling for TYPE nodes is confused
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68093
--- Comment #1 from Eric Niebler ---
Still happens on trunk, 2 years later:
template
concept bool True = true;
template
struct S {
friend bool operator==(S, int) requires True { return true; }
friend bool operator==(S, int) requires !True
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This uses your patch to gcc, plus the following patch to gdb:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-10/msg00266.html
Great, thanks for the testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82547
Bug ID: 82547
Summary: wide_int is not setting overflow properly for large
unsigned add/subtract calculations.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82274
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 13 17:19:12 2017
New Revision: 253734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82274
* internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
Alex Potapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opotapenko at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82274
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 13 17:26:28 2017
New Revision: 253735
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253735&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82274
* internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69078
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 13 17:38:50 2017
New Revision: 253736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/69078
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69078
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82511
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 01:39:26AM +, foreese at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Fritz Reese changed:
>
> Under other DEC compilers, it seems STRUCTUREs are to be treated consistently
> with derived types in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70515
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|gcc at norgg dot o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81048
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 18:59:34 2017
New Revision: 253738
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253738&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/81048
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82357
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Oct 13 19:03:41 2017
New Revision: 253739
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253739&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82357 - bit-field in template
* tree.c (cp_stabili
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82357
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544
--- Comment #7 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
i can provide build zone on on real SPARC64 T5220 with DilOS if needed.
just ping me directly to igor at dilos dot org.
i have with DilOS:
gcc-4.4.7 (32bit default) + SunAS + illumos ld - for dilos-illumos b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82274
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 13 20:14:34 2017
New Revision: 253743
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253743&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82274
* internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82353
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 13 20:19:17 2017
New Revision: 253744
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253744&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/82353
* g++.dg/ubsan/pr82353-2.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81404
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82548
Bug ID: 82548
Summary: After -r 253646 GCC 8.0 can't build cross compiler for
mingw32
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
Qing Zhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 f
-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171013 (experimental) [trunk revision 253721] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment #4 from Wilc
96 matches
Mail list logo
