https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514
Bug ID: 82514
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:749
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
PR77787 trace looks similar.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
Andrzej Krzemienski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80914
--- Comment #9 from Steven Noonan ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #8)
> Which version of GCC are you using in comment #7?
Oops, forgot to mention that bit. Built from trunk a few hours ago:
$ go.gcc version
go version go1.9 gccgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82159
--- Comment #12 from chr at terma dot com ---
I've build a gcc 7.2.0 + above patch using crosstool ng. The original test code
passes, so I should have managed to succesfully create a patches gcc.
Steps to Repro:
-
g++ -c -O0 tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82159
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to chr from comment #12)
> I've build a gcc 7.2.0 + above patch using crosstool ng. The original test
> code passes, so I should have managed to succesfully create a patches gcc.
>
Confirm, all b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
Indeed, it passes/fails randomly in subsequent builds. It is killed, maybe
because of a timeout, but there is nothing in the standard logs.
I've been trying to patch dejagnu to be more verbose in such case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82515
Bug ID: 82515
Summary: incorrect implicit integer type conversion by
arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #9)
> Indeed, it passes/fails randomly in subsequent builds. It is killed, maybe
> because of a timeout, but there is nothing in the standard logs.
>
> I've been tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78025
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81299
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 11 08:50:15 2017
New Revision: 253630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/81299
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82457
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82515
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
While using clang to compile this code, the output is also 1. This, at a
certain extent, indicates that the problem was caused by the
arm-linux-gnueabic-gcc compiler.
$ clang -w -static test.c; ./a.out
1
H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78523
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Another idea: Could there be a network drive in the PATH
that does not respond in time?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82230
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 11 09:04:29 2017
New Revision: 253631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253631&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/82230
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78558
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, gcc at sjor dot sg wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
>
> --- Comment #14 from Sjors Gielen ---
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79822
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80075
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|mukesh.kapoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82513
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77356
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gene at genethomas dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
Steven Noonan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.2.0 |7.2.1
--- Comment #6 from Steven Noonan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80194
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I believe this might work fine on the trunk after PR82374, but haven't
verified.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80421
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80543
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
--- Comment #8 from Steven Noonan ---
Oh, awesome! I just tested a gcc trunk build and it's definitely working there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80412
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 11 10:01:23 2017
New Revision: 253632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/80412
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80412
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82414
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77907
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71515
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82437
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82388
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82389
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82386
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82381
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407
Bug 82407 depends on bug 82381, which changed state.
Bug 82381 Summary: [8 Regression] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82381
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82155
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82078
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81981
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81624
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Most likely the test need better guards on -mbranch-cost= and/or
logical_op_short_circuit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80843
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82516
Bug ID: 82516
Summary: Optimize jmp chain
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80609
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82416
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] Compiler |[6/7 Regression] Compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80843
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82508
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81924
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82515
Yibiao Yang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81924
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE: in |[6 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82517
Bug ID: 82517
Summary: use-after-scope for a variable with big alignment
causes a false positive
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82484
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 11 12:24:44 2017
New Revision: 253637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not handled volatile arguments (PR sanitizer/82484).
2017-10-11 Marti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57925
Timon Knigge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t.e.knigge at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82490
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 11 12:31:59 2017
New Revision: 253640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not error for no_sanitize attributes (PR sanitizer/82490).
2017-10-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80914
--- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I can't recreate the problem. I did the same commands in
github.com/twstrike/ed448 and they worked for me.
Using `go test -c -gccgoflags -Wl,--compress-debug-sections=zlib` to generate
an executable, an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
Bug ID: 82518
Summary: [8 regression]
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on
armeb since r252917
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||armeb
--- Comment #1 from Christophe L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82490
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82472
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Oct 11 13:04:05 2017
New Revision: 253641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/82472
* tree-loop-distribut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo