[Bug tree-optimization/82421] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1127

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82421 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82422] New: [8 Regression][graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82422 Bug ID: 82422 Summary: [8 Regression][graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:248 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/82421] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1127

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82421 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Oh, I forgot to mention that I had indeed applied that one on top of the weekly snapshot.

[Bug middle-end/82394] Pointer imposes an optimization barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/82413] [8 Regression] -O0 crash (ICE in decompose, at tree.h:5179)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82413 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/82374] #pragma GCC optimize is not applied to openmp-generated functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82374 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 4 07:50:38 2017 New Revision: 253395 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253395&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82374 * omp-low.c (create_omp_child_f

[Bug tree-optimization/82381] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82381 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 4 07:52:26 2017 New Revision: 253396 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253396&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82381 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (sort_by_

[Bug c/82423] New: GCC 4.3 fails if first PATH element contains subdirectory named gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82423 Bug ID: 82423 Summary: GCC 4.3 fails if first PATH element contains subdirectory named gcc Product: gcc Version: 4.3.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/82037] Debian 8.8 powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu bootstrap breaks in stage1 with gcc/liblto_plugin.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82037 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- /usr/bin/ld is a ppc32 binary, thus cannot load a ppc64 plugin. Either point the build to a ppc64 ld, or use a wrapper script that filters out the -plugin and -plugin-opt options.

[Bug c++/82424] [8 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have typename_type in lookup_base, at cp/search.c:203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82424 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/82424] New: [8 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have typename_type in lookup_base, at cp/search.c:203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82424 Bug ID: 82424 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have typename_type in lookup_base, at cp/search.c:203 Product

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #42280|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82370] AVX512 can use a memory operand for immediate-count vpsrlw, but gcc doesn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82370 --- Comment #4 from Peter Cordes --- VPANDQ can be shorter than an equivalent VPAND, for displacements > 127 but <= 16 * 127 or 32 * 127, and that are an exact multiple of the vector width. EVEX with disp8 always implies a compressed displacemen

[Bug c++/78816] [c++14] Static auto variable usage in generic/variadic lambda fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78816 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 08:34:40 2017 New Revision: 253397 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253397&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini PR c++/78816 * g++

[Bug c++/78816] [c++14] Static auto variable usage in generic/variadic lambda fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78816 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 78816, which changed state. Bug 78816 Summary: [c++14] Static auto variable usage in generic/variadic lambda fails to compile https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78816 What|Removed

[Bug c++/71332] Passing non-copyable type by reference to variadic generic lambda after a copyable type by value results in a compile-time error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71332 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71564] label inside a lambda conflicts (?) with another one outside it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71564 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/61358] Bogus "duplicate label" error after label used within C++11 lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61358 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jengelh at inai dot de --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c++/79563] Same-name labels in lambdas considered duplicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79563 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 79563, which changed state. Bug 79563 Summary: Same-name labels in lambdas considered duplicate https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79563 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/71564] label inside a lambda conflicts (?) with another one outside it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71564 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com| --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlin

[Bug c++/58820] lambda multiple inheritance operator() not ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comm

[Bug debug/82425] New: [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82425 Bug ID: 82425 Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c fail Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/82418] Division on a constant is suboptimal because of not using imul instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418 --- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin --- I've checked the instructions cost according to the "4. Instruction tables" by By Agner Fog. Technical University of Denmark. For skylake: ; recip throughpLatency Ports

[Bug c++/66999] Missing comma in lambda capture causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66999 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Mostly fixed in 6.2.0 - we don't ICE anymore - but we should issue a single error, not two.

[Bug tree-optimization/82381] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82381 Andrey Guskov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/71095] Problem with captureless generic lambda and calling function object with arguments passed by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71095 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 71095, which changed state. Bug 71095 Summary: Problem with captureless generic lambda and calling function object with arguments passed by reference https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71095 What

[Bug c++/71117] [6/7 Regression] Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71117 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karol.wozniak at email dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/60230] internal compiler error on lambdas capturing multidimensional arrays with dynamic boundary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60230 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/71628] ICE on valid C++11 code (with lambda expression, __typeof operator and variable length array): verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71628 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 Andrey Guskov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com --- Co

[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #0) > Created attachment 41989 [details] > preprocessed linux/mm/shmem.c file, compressed > > I ran into a few files in the linux kernel that while building wi

[Bug tree-optimization/82397] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 in vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82397 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Status|UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/82426] New: Missed tree-slp-vectorization on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82426 Bug ID: 82426 Summary: Missed tree-slp-vectorization on -O2 and -O3 Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree

[Bug tree-optimization/82426] Missed tree-slp-vectorization on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82426 --- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen --- Created attachment 42300 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42300&action=edit Assembler output with -O3

[Bug tree-optimization/82426] Missed tree-slp-vectorization on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82426 --- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen --- Created attachment 42301 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42301&action=edit Assembler output with -Os -ftree-slp-vectorize

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 --- Comment #7 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Oct 4 10:27:26 2017 New Revision: 253399 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253399&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR82396: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output r253236 broke AArch64

[Bug middle-end/82407] [8 Regression][meta-bug] qsort_chk fallout tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407 Bug 82407 depends on bug 82396, which changed state. Bug 82396 Summary: [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 What

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71946] asm in toplevel lambda function rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/82426] Missed tree-slp-vectorization on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82426 --- Comment #3 from Allan Jensen --- Note it appears the fact it can do it at all in -Os is new in gcc 7

[Bug fortran/77296] [F03] Compiler Error with allocatable string and associate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Oct 4 10:43:45 2017 New Revision: 253400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253400&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paul Thomas PR fortran/60458 PR fortran/77296

[Bug fortran/60458] Error message on associate: deferred type parameter and requires either the pointer or allocatable attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60458 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Oct 4 10:43:45 2017 New Revision: 253400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253400&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paul Thomas PR fortran/60458 PR fortran/77296

[Bug tree-optimization/82397] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 in vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82397 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- Is it possible to simply invoke data_ref_compare_tree always, without checking operand_equal_p beforehand? It's possible to canonicalize commutative chains in data_ref_compare_tree, or - even better - whi

[Bug c/82413] [8 Regression] -O0 crash (ICE in decompose, at tree.h:5179)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82413 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Oct 4 10:50:19 2017 New Revision: 253401 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253401&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR82413: Mismatched precisions in build_range_check bui

[Bug c/82413] [8 Regression] -O0 crash (ICE in decompose, at tree.h:5179)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82413 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/82418] Division on a constant is suboptimal because of not using imul instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/82374] #pragma GCC optimize is not applied to openmp-generated functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82374 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Wed Oct 4 11:13:24 2017 New Revision: 253402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253402&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Adjust test cases for attributes propagation changes for OMP outline

[Bug libgcc/82427] New: gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 Bug ID: 82427 Summary: gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime; Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/82418] Division on a constant is suboptimal because of not using imul instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3) > it's likely that your test measured something else, You are right, my test was bogus and clang's version is faster.

[Bug target/82418] Division on a constant is suboptimal because of not using imul instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7/8 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/82427] gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/82398] [8 Regression] error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 2 in fill_vec_av_set at gcc/sel-sched.c:3725

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82398 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Version|unknown

[Bug libstdc++/82427] gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82401] [8 Regression] error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 in insert_late_enum_def_bindings on an invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82401 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Version|unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/82402] [5/6/7/8 Regression] error: SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI should be set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82402 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority|P3

[Bug c++/82405] Function not inlined for switch and suboptimal assembly is generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > So it means maybe llvm performs more advance

[Bug c++/82406] [7 Regression] Rejects a valid snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82406 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/82410] [7/8 Regression] ICE in replace_placeholders_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82410 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/82412] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42334-1.f fails starting with r253342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82412 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/82414] [5 Regression] Issue with ODR/LTO in G++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82414 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug tree-optimization/82422] [8 Regression][graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82422 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82421] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1127

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82421 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/82427] gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 mgansser at alice dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from mga

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Andrey: do you have more details? I don't see how this change, which does not affect the generated code in any way, could possibly cause a SPEC failure.

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7/8 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #32 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #31) > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > > > prathamesh3492 at gcc d

[Bug libstdc++/82427] gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov --- Damn. Sorry for the false alarm. The correct revision had to be r253275.

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #5 from Andrey Guskov --- Please update the bug header: s/235275/253275/

[Bug libgomp/82428] New: Builtins for openacc gang/worker/vector id/size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82428 Bug ID: 82428 Summary: Builtins for openacc gang/worker/vector id/size Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component

[Bug tree-optimization/82397] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 in vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82397 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82397 > > --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- > Is it possible to simply invoke data_r

[Bug tree-optimization/82429] New: strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82429 Bug ID: 82429 Summary: strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug debug/82425] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82425 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82430] New: [4.9 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Bug ID: 82430 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0" Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Known to work|

[Bug fortran/82431] New: [8 Regression] Rejects 416.gamess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82431 Bug ID: 82431 Summary: [8 Regression] Rejects 416.gamess Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/82431] [8 Regression] Rejects 416.gamess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82431 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/82412] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42334-1.f fails starting with r253342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82412 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/82424] [8 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have typename_type in lookup_base, at cp/search.c:203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82424 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug testsuite/82412] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42334-1.f fails starting with r253342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82412 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oh, and ISL is what comes from contrib/download_prerequisites. isl-0.18 in this case.

[Bug fortran/82431] [8 Regression] Rejects 416.gamess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82431 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82429] strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82429 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/81525] [7 Regression] Invalid codegen with constexpr variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 15:37:09 2017 New Revision: 253414 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253414&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81525 - broken handling of auto in generic lambda.

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #5 from Didier G --- OK. Build succeed. Tests in progress ...

[Bug c++/81525] [7 Regression] Invalid codegen with constexpr variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 15:38:24 2017 New Revision: 253415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253415&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81525 - broken handling of auto in generic lambda.

[Bug c++/82373] syntax error in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82373 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 4 16:15:36 2017 New Revision: 253418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253418&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/82373 * error.c (dump_function_decl): If show_retur

[Bug tree-optimization/82369] "optimizes" indexed addressing back into two pointer increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82369 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Given IR dump before IVOPTs: [15.00%] [count: INV]: _1 = dst_12(D) + bytes_13(D); end_dst_14 = (uintptr_t) _1; srcu_16 = (uintptr_t) src_15(D); dstu_17 = (uintptr_t) dst_12(D); _2 = dst

[Bug target/82409] Superflous pxor instructions in the generated assembly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82409 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82405] Function not inlined for switch and suboptimal assembly is generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- Thinking about this some more, this is a not a hoisting problem but a sinking problem. basically we have: int f(void); int h(void); int g(int a) { if (a) return f() + 10; return h() + 10; } Which

[Bug ipa/67368] Inlining failed due to no_sanitize_address and always_inline conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368 Loïc Yhuel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||loic.yhuel at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/82405] Function not inlined for switch and suboptimal assembly is generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/82429] strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82429 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Strictly, that a program declares stpcpy should be irrelevant if the declaration is outside system headers, because it could declare and define it for some other purpose (even if the protot

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 --- Comment #9 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Oct 4 16:40:44 2017 New Revision: 253419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253419&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Revert r253399: PR rtl-optimization/82396 * haifa-sched.c (autopr

  1   2   >