https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82144
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 25 07:25:31 2017
New Revision: 253134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-25 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/82144
* dwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82278
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82300
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, wrong-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Looks I've got some issue with sharer:
./minecraft
Warning: The created OpenGL context does not fully meet the settings that were
requested
Requested: version = 3.3 ; depth bits = 24 ; stencil bits = 8 ; AA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82308
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I get with GCC 7.2
> /space/rguenther/install/gcc-7.2/bin/g++ -S t.C
t.C: In function ‘int main()’:
t.C:18:16: error: missing template arguments before ‘d’
Xd{a}; //cannot be deduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
Bug ID: 82319
Summary: ICE in generic_simplify_148, at generic-match.c:6436
on arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2017-9-25
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82172
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> N.B. this bug has been latent for years. The reason people are only seeing
> it now is that usually the "extern template class std::basic_string"
> explicit in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Testing the following to match comments.
Index: gcc/match.pd
===
--- gcc/match.pd(revision 253134)
+++ gcc/match.pd(working co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
--- Comment #59 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Sep 25 08:47:41 2017
New Revision: 253137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch, Darwin] Fix PR80556 by linking the system unwinder ahead of libgcc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82183
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64,nvptx
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
--- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina ---
Thanks for the quick fix Ian!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
--- Comment #61 from Eric Botcazou ---
Nice work, thanks! But I'm sure the next Darwin crisis is already looming. ;-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82316
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
--- Comment #4 from Yury Gribov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Testing the following to match comments.
Thanks, so the assertion proved to be useful in the end.
I'd rather change cst_int_p to be
bool cst_int_p = real_ident
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
>
> --- Comment #4 from Yury Gribov ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82308
--- Comment #2 from sdalleig at mmci dot uni-saarland.de ---
I think that the error-message you get is correct if you are using C++14. The
new standard allows for template argument deduction based on constructors and
guides.
The problem occurred
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035
--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Sep 25 10:36:23 2017
New Revision: 253145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[nvptx] Add exit after call to noreturn function
2017-09-25 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81069
--- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Sep 25 10:36:23 2017
New Revision: 253145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[nvptx] Add exit after call to noreturn function
2017-09-25 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79041
--- Comment #13 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> This test also fails with -fpic.
It doesn't run in the testsuite with -fpic, so is it a problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
--- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Shouldn't
> ...
> catch that?
Yes, these are the checks that constant fits into integer type.
> Though, for those I think you really don't need itype_fits_ftype_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82285
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 25 11:40:23 2017
New Revision: 253146
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253146&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-25 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[6/7/8 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7)
> > Backtrace from gdb is more complete:
>
> Backtrace looks similar to PR 80556 comment 3. Problem in that PR also is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82155
--- Comment #5 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Mon Sep 25 12:26:36 2017
New Revision: 253147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR82155] Fix crash in dwarf2out_abstract_function
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82318
--- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is interesting because log2 should have already done a rounding to
> double before returning.
I suppose that if the C library has been built with GCC with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82321
Bug ID: 82321
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:707
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82320
Bug ID: 82320
Summary: [8 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82317
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82322
Bug ID: 82322
Summary: vec_ceil/vec_floor/vec_round intrincics do not work
for gcc 8, need __builtin_s390_vfidb.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugs at m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82320
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82322
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82320
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Starting iteration 37161
Value numbering md_11 stmt = md_11 = PHI
Setting value number of md_11 to md_21(D) (changed)
Value numbering md_10 stmt = md_10 = PHI
Setting value number of md_10 to lq_24(D) (cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82321
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Sep 25 14:59:19 2017
New Revision: 253153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81854
* src/c++98/complex_io.cc (_GLIBCXX_LD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82296
--- Comment #6 from Ingo ---
> https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/c/ARR30-C.+Do+not+form+or+use+out-of-bounds+pointers+or+array+subscripts
Just out of curiosity:
I am not able to find any of that in the ANSI/ISO C89 standard. T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82313
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82323
Bug ID: 82323
Summary: circular ifunc attribute on a function definition
silently accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82230
nik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from nik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82163
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Mon Sep 25 17:32:36 2017
New Revision: 253161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253161&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/82163
* tree-ssa-loop-manip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #3 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
This happens only on GCC7 with -flto activated.
clang-6, GCC6 and GCC5 with either flag enabled or disabled compile code that
runs fine.
I don't know why this error is occurring for you Martin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66756
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 42234
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42234&action=edit
Build log
Hm, for me GCC 6 with -O0 also fails. Please take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #5 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
I can't reproduce your error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82312
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to krzysio.kurek from comment #5)
> I can't reproduce your error.
Is the error I see the same you see with GCC 7? That said a syntax error in a
shader?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #7 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
No, the error you're having is completely different from what I originally
reported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #8 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
In a sense that there is no error, the program goes into infinite loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82323
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224
--- Comment #5 from Melissa ---
This originated from a Stack Overflow post "supercat" made (I'm the "Myria"
there).
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46205744/is-this-use-of-unions-strictly-conforming/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82316
--- Comment #4 from Jordi Vilar ---
I'm sorry if I didn't explain it correctly.
I don't claim that a extern "C" declarations have to be interpreted as C in a
C++ translation unit. What I say is that most C libraries (libtiff, zlib, lcms,
etc.) p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82324
Bug ID: 82324
Summary: Problem in new trunk test case
gfortran.dg/promotion_4.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80266
Qing Zhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
--- Comment #2 from Maxim ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> clang accepts it.
Yes, I know. I would like to know if the g++ is deviating from the standard,
that nothing is written about it, or will it be fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79041
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #13)
> It doesn't run in the testsuite with -fpic, so is it a problem?
I run the testsuite with RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix/\{,-fpic\}' and this
testcase fails in the -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82325
Bug ID: 82325
Summary: worse code generated compared to clang when using a
constexpr array
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> That PR is now fixed. I've re-enabled ada in my test setup, and will see if
> I can still reproduce this failure.
It's a different problem since it's on Linux and the other was Darwin-specific.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82324
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Does this fix the problem?
Index: promotion_3.f90
===
--- promotion_3.f90 (revision 253178)
+++ promotion_3.f90 (working copy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Sep 25 23:49:58 2017
New Revision: 253181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch, Darwin] Fix 81037 by adjutng headers
2017-09-26 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Sep 26 02:38:12 2017
New Revision: 253186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR demangler/82195
* cp-demangle.c (d_encoding): Strip r
76 matches
Mail list logo
