https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82239
Bug ID: 82239
Summary: Parentheses around constexpr template member break
static_assert
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
--- Comment #53 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #52)
> > Yes, that's expected at present.
> > a. there's evidently some more EH breakage caused by the
> > reorder-and-partition (see 81733)
> > b. the libgcc unwinder s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80295
Qing Zhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
Bug ID: 82240
Summary: i386.md & -Wlogical-op in build
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71504
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Tom Westerhout from comment #2)
Start by stepping through the GCC code that handles the test case and figuring
out what triggers the error and what makes GCC accept the successful case.
Compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 17:41:07 2017
New Revision: 252936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252936&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82069 - ICE with lambda in template
* semantics.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 82069, which changed state.
Bug 82069 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
It refers to the source files generated from this file. You need to look at
the context to see which file was actually compiled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #18 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #7)
> > Putting "sp" in the clobbers list is something that was suggested to me on
> > the GCC mailing list a while back. A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78822
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78674
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63552
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59252
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55501
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51945
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:33:52 2017
New Revision: 252937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252937&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/55922 - list-value-initialization of base
PR c++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63151
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:33:52 2017
New Revision: 252937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252937&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/55922 - list-value-initialization of base
PR c++/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72457
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:33:58 2017
New Revision: 252938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252938&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72457 - ICE with list-value-initialized base.
* i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:34:10 2017
New Revision: 252940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252940&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80294 - ICE with constexpr and inheritance.
* con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:34:03 2017
New Revision: 252939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252939&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79607 - ICE with T{} initializer
* decl.c (type_de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:36:47 2017
New Revision: 252941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81525 - wrong constant value with generic lambda
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:36:53 2017
New Revision: 252942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81671 - nullptr_t template parameter
* pt.c (conve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78840
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:37:04 2017
New Revision: 252944
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252944&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78840 - ICE with const and nested generic lambda
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80935
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:36:59 2017
New Revision: 252943
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252943&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80935 - wrong C++17 error with lambda
* decl.c (ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80767
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:37:10 2017
New Revision: 252945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80767 - unnecessary instantiation of generic lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81236
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:37:16 2017
New Revision: 252946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81236 - ICE with template-id in generic lambda
* p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50541
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50438
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82030
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:37:10 2017
New Revision: 252945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80767 - unnecessary instantiation of generic lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82234
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:49:41 2017
New Revision: 252947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/82234
* doc/extend.texi: Add @findex entry for __buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82082
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82230
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82230
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The Boost testsuite hits this many times (>100).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81613
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Author: schwab
Date: Mon Sep 18 19:06:00 2017
New Revision: 252949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81613
* config/m68k/m68k.md (moveq feeding equality comparison
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41651|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81468
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 18 20:00:32 2017
New Revision: 252950
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252950&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81468 fix test for duration conversions
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #5 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
Created attachment 42199
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42199&action=edit
callgrind output
I can make the program output to console average fps after 20 iterations with
10 w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #6 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
Oh, two comments about the callgrind output.
Random::get() is being called 14 times less often on GCC6
There is a function created from template in GCC7 that is completely absent on
GCC6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #7 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
I've created a fork with "devel" branch here:
https://github.com/kiroma/Empire/tree/devel
I've tweaked some things, so now random seed is set, the simulation will exit
after 250 iterations and aft
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82234
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Sep 18 22:47:49 2017
New Revision: 252956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refix pr 71977
Modified:
branches/ibm/xscvdpsp/gcc/ChangeLog.me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #22)
> It looks like this was fixed last year, can it be closed?
It is still a regression in GCC 5 and GCC 6. It used to work in GCC 4.9.4.
See the known to work fie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #24 from Steve Ellcey ---
So should the patch be backported to the 5/6 branches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #8 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
Okay, I'm terribly sorry for the amount of messages but I'm failing over and
over again trying to grasp the issue.
The seed is only static for the first request, but changes later on becoming
rand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does -fno-threadsafe-statics help here?
Though that should not make a difference here as GCC 6 defaults to the same as
GCC 7 in this area.
Also does moving "static Random r;" outside of Random::get() help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947
--- Comment #15 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 18 23:57:26 2017
New Revision: 252957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252957&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/80947
* g+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82241
Bug ID: 82241
Summary: invalid warning on valid int64_t value
-9223372036854775808
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82242
Bug ID: 82242
Summary: x86_64 bad optimization with -march
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82242
--- Comment #1 from Guillaume Morin ---
Created attachment 42201
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42201&action=edit
"fast" testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82243
Bug ID: 82243
Summary: -fcheck=bounds not checking, and behaving differently
with different real kinds
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
Bug ID: 82244
Summary: -O2: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have
integer_cst in replace_uses_by, at tree-cfg.c:1904
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivo.raisr at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
--- Comment #2 from Ivo Raisr ---
Reproducible with gcc 8.0 and 7.2.
I was not able to reproduce it with 6.3.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77729
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
Target: x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
#include
int64_t shift64(int32_t a) {
return (int64_t)a << 5;
}
#ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__
__int128 shift128(int64_t a) {
return (__int128)a << 5;
}
#endif
// https://godbolt.org/g/HsjpvV
gcc 8.0.0 20170918 -O3
shift128 on x86-64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82242
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Nothing gets vectorized :-(
Note that to fill the vector, this would be better
std::vector array(size, 1e-9);
In the reduction, we seem to do strange things with the accumulator.
addsd (%rax), %x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82241
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 165 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
