[Bug tree-optimization/79622] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 07:34:04 2017 New Revision: 252905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252905&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/79622

[Bug tree-optimization/79622] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug other/39851] gcc -Q --help=target does not list extensions selected by -march=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851 --- Comment #18 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Daniel Santos from comment #17) > Thanks for all your work on this Martin. I've put a script up on my github > account (https://github.com/daniel-santos/distccflags), updated the Gentoo > Distcc

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or just remove or xfail the testcase. The asan.c change is right even for the branches... BTW, just for completeness, I'm also seeing +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr69255-2.c (test for excess errors) +FAIL: gcc.

[Bug c++/82230] [8 Regression] Segfault when binding lambda to variable inside a generic lambda inside a template member function inside a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82230 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/82231] [7/8 Regression] ICE when deducing non-type template parameter value whose type depends on a non-type `auto` template parameter from function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82231 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/81736] Unnecessary save and restore frame pointer with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81736 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Mon Sep 18 08:25:11 2017 New Revision: 252908 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252908&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix gcc.target/i386/pr81736-[34].c on 32-bit Solaris/x86 (PR target/81736)

[Bug ada/71358] GNAT.Command_Line.Getopt fails if there are no switches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358 --- Comment #6 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pmderodat Date: Mon Sep 18 08:43:37 2017 New Revision: 252909 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252909&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Bob Duff Alternate fix for PR ada

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > Or just remove or xfail the testcase. The asan.c change is right even for > the branches... > > BTW, just for completeness, I'm also seeing > +FAIL: gcc.target

[Bug target/81733] stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- > Is this still current? It is: just tried with a vanilla tree at r252892. > The ld64 assert is most likely triggered by a 0-length FDE. That cou

[Bug lto/82229] GCC7's LTO underperforms compared to GCC6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto, missed-optimization St

[Bug libfortran/82233] [6/7/8 Regression] execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug lto/82229] GCC7's LTO underperforms compared to GCC6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Moreover, if there's an automatic way how one can get FPS without GUI interaction, I can bisect revision that's responsible for that.

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > > Or just remove or xfail the testcase. The asan.c change is right even for > > the branches... > > > > BTW, just

[Bug target/81422] [aarch64] internal compiler error: in update_equiv_regs, at ira.c:3425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81422 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/81733] stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3) > > --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- > > Is this still current? > > It is: just tried with a vanilla tree at r252892. > > > The ld64 assert is m

[Bug target/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Sep 18 09:15:32 2017 New Revision: 252914 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252914&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81361 * dwarf2cfi.c (add_cfis_to_fde): Do n

[Bug c++/80947] [6/7/8 Regression] Different visibility for the lambda and its capture list members with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com,

[Bug target/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/82145] [8 regression] i386/pr38988.c, i386/pr46254.c, i386/pr55154.c, i386/pr81766.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82145 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 18 09:31:14 2017 New Revision: 252915 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252915&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/82145 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_init_large_pic_

[Bug c++/58894] C++11 lambda doesn't take const variable by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58894 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 58894, which changed state. Bug 58894 Summary: C++11 lambda doesn't take const variable by reference https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58894 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/53157] within lambda, error: lvalue required as unary ‘&’ operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53157 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abyss.7 at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug target/80566] no use of avx vmovups on ymm registry in set and copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80566 Vlad changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.solontsov at mlp dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/80566] no use of avx vmovups on ymm registry in set and copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80566 --- Comment #2 from Vlad --- I can confirm this for gcc7.1/7.2 with -O3 -g -mavx2: https://godbolt.org/g/h7TNJV

[Bug tree-optimization/82224] Strict-aliasing not noticing valid aliasing of two unions with active members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/82220] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 482.sphinx3 ~10% performance regression with trunk@250416

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82220 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82220] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 482.sphinx3 ~10% performance regression with trunk@250416

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82220 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80920] warnings get position wrong - very confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80920 --- Comment #5 from Jason Vas Dias --- I think if GCC cannot get the position of an error correct, then it should not show the position at all .

[Bug target/82108] [7 Regression] Wrong vectorized code generated for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82108 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/82084] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: constructing wstring with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82084 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 10:13:54 2017 New Revision: 252918 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252918&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug target/82108] [7 Regression] Wrong vectorized code generated for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82108 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 10:13:54 2017 New Revision: 252918 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252918&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/81410] [5/6 Regression] -O3 breaks code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410 Bug 81410 depends on bug 82108, which changed state. Bug 82108 Summary: [7 Regression] Wrong vectorized code generated for x86_64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82108 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/25071] dummy argument larger than actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Please do if you can, after testing on trunk. I can do it if Janus unassign himself.

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- That looks risky to me, changes behavior. Can't you instead of the warning + removal from attributes just do something that doesn't crash when it sees an empty string wherever it crashed?

[Bug target/62254] [5/6/7 Regression] gcc-4.9 ICEs on linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 --- Comment #24 from Arnd Bergmann --- Created attachment 42194 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42194&action=edit r234568 ported to gcc-5 I ran into this old bug again while build testing with gcc-4.9.4 and gcc-5.4.1. I chec

[Bug target/82005] [8 regression] early lto debug creates invalid assembly on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #18) > So .. just some notes on thoughts so far, not much conclusion yet. > > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #17) > > On September 16, 2017 2:37:02 PM GMT

[Bug c++/45033] "delete" does overload resolution for class operands, but shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45033 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/80920] warnings get position wrong - very confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80920 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- The caret location is just using the same info as the diagnostic message: b.C:7:12:... Should we suppress that too? So if you have a file with thousands of lines in, rather than give a location that is in

[Bug driver/82236] New: Offloading with -fno-use-linker-plugin fails, poor diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82236 Bug ID: 82236 Summary: Offloading with -fno-use-linker-plugin fails, poor diagnostics Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: lto, openacc, open

[Bug c++/80947] [6/7/8 Regression] Different visibility for the lambda and its capture list members with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #12) > As far as the snippet in Comment #4 is concerned, current trunk seems fine > to me. Ah yes. It was fixed on trunk by r251433

[Bug sanitizer/81505] [5/6 Regression] ICE in tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:95 with -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81505 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 11:07:50 2017 New Revision: 252919 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252919&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/81977] [5/6 Regression] Issue with inline memcpy with optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 11:07:50 2017 New Revision: 252919 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252919&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug c++/82084] [5/6 Regression] ICE: constructing wstring with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82084 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 11:07:50 2017 New Revision: 252919 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252919&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug middle-end/80341] [5 Regression] gcc miscompiles division of signed char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80341 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 11:10:06 2017 New Revision: 252920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252920&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] [5 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 11:10:06 2017 New Revision: 252920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252920&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug driver/82236] Offloading with -fno-use-linker-plugin fails, poor diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82236 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- IMHO -f[no-]use-linker-plugin should be removed and the collect2 path "collected". At least -f[no-]use-linker-plugin should be a noop on hosts/targets where the linker plugin works. People tend to shoot th

[Bug target/62254] [5/6/7 Regression] gcc-4.9 ICEs on linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 --- Comment #25 from Arnd Bergmann --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #24) > Created attachment 42194 [details] > r234568 ported to gcc-5 > > I ran into this old bug again while build testing with gcc-4.9.4 and > gcc-5.4.1. I checked th

[Bug target/81733] stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3) > > > --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- > > > Is this still current? > > > > It is: just tried with a

[Bug libstdc++/71187] declval() can be implemented without requiring a template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71187 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Sep 18 11:40:10 2017 New Revision: 252922 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252922&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/71187 reimplement declval without add_rvalue_reference

[Bug c++/80947] [6/7 Regression] Different visibility for the lambda and its capture list members with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini --- I see. I'm adding the testcase, but it's still a 6/7 Regression, hopefully part of the lambda overhaul can be easily backported.

[Bug libstdc++/71187] declval() can be implemented without requiring a template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71187 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > That looks risky to me, changes behavior. Can't you instead of the warning > + removal from attributes just do something that doesn't crash when it sees > an em

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #16) > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c > @@ -9447,7 +9447,6 @@ handle_target_attribute (tree *node, tree name, tree > args, int flags, >

[Bug tree-optimization/80105] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #18 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #16) > > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c > > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c > > @@ -9447,7 +9447,6 @@ handle_target_attribute

[Bug c++/45033] "delete" does overload resolution for class operands, but shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45033 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Sep 18 12:08:14 2017 New Revision: 252924 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252924&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Paolo Carlini PR c++/45033 * g++

[Bug c++/45033] "delete" does overload resolution for class operands, but shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45033 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #49 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg00045.html is still needed after revision r252914 (fix for pr81361).

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #19 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17) > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #16) > > > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c > > > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- That would be my preference (perhaps even for GCC 7, only do the warning and attribute removal on the trunk).

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #50 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #49) > The patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg00045.html is > still needed after revision r252914 (fix for pr81361). Yes, that's expected at

[Bug target/81733] stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3) > > > > --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- > > > > Is this

[Bug libstdc++/60936] [5/6 Regression] Binary code bloat with std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936 --- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Sep 18 12:57:05 2017 New Revision: 252925 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252925&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60936 reduce coupling between objects in libstdc++.a Backp

[Bug libstdc++/60936] [5 Regression] Binary code bloat with std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-04-15 00:00:00 |2017-9-18 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/69728] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/80171] [5 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) with optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 13:14:45 2017 New Revision: 252926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252926&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug middle-end/68528] [5 Only] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/64516] [5 Regression] arm: wrong unaligned load generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 13:14:45 2017 New Revision: 252926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252926&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug middle-end/80362] [5 Regression] gcc miscompiles arithmetic with signed char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80362 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 13:14:45 2017 New Revision: 252926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252926&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug middle-end/68528] [5 Only] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 18 13:14:45 2017 New Revision: 252926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252926&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug middle-end/68528] [5 Only] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/80362] [5 Regression] gcc miscompiles arithmetic with signed char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80362 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/80171] [5 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) with optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/64516] [5 Regression] arm: wrong unaligned load generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/69728] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 80105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/80105] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/59859] [meta-bug] GRAPHITE issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859 Bug 59859 depends on bug 80105, which changed state. Bug 80105 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1019 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105 What|Removed

[Bug target/81733] stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > > > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3) > > > > > --

[Bug rtl-optimization/82237] New: [AArch64] Destructive operations result in poor register allocation after scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82237 Bug ID: 82237 Summary: [AArch64] Destructive operations result in poor register allocation after scheduling Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug sanitizer/81715] asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 --- Comment #4 from Arnd Bergmann --- Created attachment 42195 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42195&action=edit preprocessed net/wireless/nl80211.c, compressed This is another file that shows the problem, in fact we hit thi

[Bug rtl-optimization/82237] [AArch64] Destructive operations result in poor register allocation after scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82237 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64*-*-* Status|UNCON

[Bug libstdc++/60936] [5 Regression] Binary code bloat with std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936 --- Comment #38 from Markus Eisenmann --- Hi Jonathan! It seems, that the minor change/fix from comment #31 (rev. 245505) is currently missing in branches/gcc-6-branch/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/snprintf_lite.cc; needs also to be merged into this.

[Bug tree-optimization/69728] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 --- Comment #15 from Sebastian Pop --- It makes sense to early fail when the schedule builder gets confused and built an empty domain. Could you please also add a comment around the if that sets schedule_error? The change looks good. Thanks.

[Bug target/81733] stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > > > > (In reply to r...@cebi

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #18 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 42196 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42196&action=edit Hacky workaround

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de --- [...] >>That worked just fine, thanks. >> >>While there are still ld warnings >> >>ld: warning: file /var/tmp//ccmgPmhadebugobjtem: s

[Bug demangler/82195] Undemangleable lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 82195, which changed state. Bug 82195 Summary: Undemangleable lambda https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/79622] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622 --- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop --- > I would have expected at least each memory op to be in a separate "black box" We could have a pass before graphite that splits BBs with more than one write into blocks that contain one data write with all

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > > --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #51 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10) > Interestingly, a i386-apple-darwin16 bootstrap *does* work fine. That's because the keymgr does work for m32 binaries. It's never kept track of images for x86_64 (

[Bug target/81422] [aarch64] internal compiler error: in update_equiv_regs, at ira.c:3425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81422 --- Comment #3 from Qing Zhao --- if the DEST is NOT a REG (sometimes it's a SUBREG, for example in the testing case of this Bug), the REG_EQUIV notes should NOT be added.

[Bug target/82196] -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues stubs sometimes use wrong MOV instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82196 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Core2 duo /opt/gcc/build_w/./gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/build_w/./gcc/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc8w/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/bin/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc8w/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.

[Bug c++/81536] [8 Regression] Recent crash in is_std_substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81536 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #52 from Eric Botcazou --- > Yes, that's expected at present. > a. there's evidently some more EH breakage caused by the > reorder-and-partition (see 81733) > b. the libgcc unwinder seems to have some issues even on systems that shoul

[Bug middle-end/82238] New: ICE while building linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82238 Bug ID: 82238 Summary: ICE while building linux kernel Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/82238] ICE while building linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82238 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/81318] [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at profile-count.h:189

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de

  1   2   >