https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34016|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81474
--- Comment #2 from Fedor Bobkov ---
Thread-starting example is intended only for demonstration of out of memory
error on simply example. In real projects out of memory error occurs with much
smaller loops which just use bigger amount of data.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81474
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Fedor Bobkov from comment #2)
> Thread-starting example is intended only for demonstration of out of memory
> error on simply example. In real projects out of memory error occurs with
> much small
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81474
--- Comment #4 from Fedor Bobkov ---
> Can you please elaborate it more? We're interested in a test-case for that ;)
I'll try to make simplified code of this app as soon as possible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> The documentation explicitly says -Wpedantic includes some warnings about
> things outside of ISO C, beyond those that violate syntax rules or
> con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82187
Bug ID: 82187
Summary: missing optimization pointer to char*
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82186
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |testsuite
--- Comment #1 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
Yes, sorry I neglected to update the assignee. The bug itself is simple to fix
but it highlighted a different related problem. That's what's delayed the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82180
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
> However, I'm running into spills being generated by lra using an unaligned
> register pair (in this case, it's (r67, r77)):
Sorry, that's a mistake, that's supposed to be (r67, r68).
> ...
> ;(insn 53501 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82138
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82188
Bug ID: 82188
Summary: Missed optimization opportunity for constant folding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Richard, I think you have access to the SPEC
sources (which no gfortran maintainer has).
Could you give us a hint of what goes wrong?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82133
--- Comment #3 from Nick ---
According to
https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/1292#issuecomment-327788223, it is in
the kernel/x86_64/dgemv_n_microk_haswell-4.c source where the loop-unrolling
has caused the parent function call which is ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82189
Bug ID: 82189
Summary: Two level SLP needed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Bug 56818 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82189
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39304
Bug 39304 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I have reopened pr34640 due to ICEs that were not present in the latest patch I
have tested.
I don't know if this PR is the same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I have been able to bootstrap with the commit for ada/sem_ch7.adb reverted.
Unfortunately this does not survive the following changes (probably expected),
i.e., r251975 is still broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82147
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The vectorizer performs interleaving for this kind of loop, your manual one
isn't really vectorized (you only vectorize the load).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82154
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
IIRC bitfield rvalues get promoted to 'int' before overload resolution applies
but I may be wrong. enum bitfields may also be a GNU extension.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82188
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82186
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82187
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82189
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82190
Bug ID: 82190
Summary: Possibly latent miscompilation issue on
ppc64le-linux-gnu for memcpy-bi.c with -fweb
-fno-optimize-strlen
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82116
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82150
--- Comment #3 from david.welch at netronome dot com ---
The problem exists as well with ldr pc,[something]. I have not dug through gcc
but did some compilation experiments, not nearly enough to be 100% sure, but
for switch statements the code ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Latent issue in gimple-fold.c:
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
===
--- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 252002)
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy)
@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 12 11:49:29 2017
New Revision: 252003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82112
* c-common.c (sync_resolve_size): Instead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191
Bug ID: 82191
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thanks Thomas.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82129
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Not yet analyzed but I see LIM performs store-motion on
[0.00%] [count: INV] [loop 5 header]:
- *h5_26(D) = tv_24(D);
+ h5__lsm.7_18 = tv_24(D);
where I think stores from undefined SSA names could be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Bug 56818 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39304
Bug 39304 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
>
> Wilco changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 12 13:21:52 2017
New Revision: 252007
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252007&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/82149
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Sep 12 13:27:13 2017
New Revision: 252008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR81285: Fix uninitialised variable in emit_store_flag_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 13:31:20 2017
New Revision: 252017
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252017&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70483 make std::experimental::string_view fully constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82132
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> There is no "builtin" for this, the link fail will not go away.
>
Really? You did r207595 yourself, which is the revision that bug 65244 comment
11 said added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 14:02:59 2017
New Revision: 252018
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79433 no #error for including headers with wrong -std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 14:03:06 2017
New Revision: 252019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79433 no #error for including TS headers with wrong -std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I don't think this is a dup of 67165, which is about compressed debug sections.
This PR is about debug info in separate files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82157
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 12 14:15:37 2017
New Revision: 252020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82157
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I see, thanks for clarification. I'm going to send patch for the remaining
bits, hopefully I made it in a right way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, causes
Running /tmp/trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr65263.C -std=gnu++98 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr65263.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82114
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 12 14:32:39 2017
New Revision: 252024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252024&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix GIMPLE FE test (PR testsuite/82114)
2017-09-12 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82114
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Trying
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
===
--- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 252006)
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy)
@@ -3862,24 +3862,18 @@ g
LLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/gcc-dev/bin-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /gcc-dev/trunk/configure --prefix=/gcc-dev/bin-trunk
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170912 (Rev. 252003) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does -fsantize=undefined show anything?
I am suspecting you have undefined behavior with respect to the shift.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 12 15:25:15 2017
New Revision: 252028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82112
* config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (altivec_resolv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80204
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Sep 12 15:29:16 2017
New Revision: 252029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252029&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/80204
* config/darwin-driver.c (darwin_find_versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #2 from Vsevolod Livinskiy ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does -fsantize=undefined show anything?
>
> I am suspecting you have undefined behavior with respect to the shift.
Test doesn't contain undefined behavior,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
>
> --- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, vsevolod.livinskij at frtk dot ru wrote:
> struct struct_t {
> unsigned int memb : 13;
> };
>
> extern struct_t b;
> printf("%llu\n", b.memb);
unsigned int :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81422
Qing Zhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |7.3
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:01 2017
New Revision: 252030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Finish implementing P0426R1 "Constexpr for std::char_traits" for C++17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:14 2017
New Revision: 252032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252032&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70483 make std::experimental::string_view fully constexpr
B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:09 2017
New Revision: 252031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70483 make std::string_view fully constexpr
Backport from m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81498
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:30:28 2017
New Revision: 252034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add -static-pie to GCC driver to create static PIE
This patch adds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42160
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42160&action=edit
gcc8-pr81325.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:33:31 2017
New Revision: 252035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252035&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Steve Ellcey
PR other/81096
* libbacktrace/Mak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81498
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
