[Bug c++/71974] Warning: uninitialized variable with OpenMP nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71974 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, openmp Status|UN

[Bug target/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #8 from Romain --- Hi Jack, Thanks. My system is a Core i7 (HT enabled), so I have 8 cores, good catch! Regards, Romain

[Bug fortran/81974] New: ICE verify_gimple failed type mismatch in binary expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81974 Bug ID: 81974 Summary: ICE verify_gimple failed type mismatch in binary expression Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/81975] New: Unpacking two packs via alias erroneously complains about mismatched argument packs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81975 Bug ID: 81975 Summary: Unpacking two packs via alias erroneously complains about mismatched argument packs Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c++/81928] if(!this) optimization leads to possible errors without warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81928 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/52869] [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869 David Stone changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david at doublewise dot net --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/66672] std::is_same wrong result for captured reference value inside a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66672 Henry Cooney changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hacoo36 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/66256] noexcept evaluation done before end of class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 David Stone changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david at doublewise dot net --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/66256] noexcept evaluation done before end of class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 --- Comment #9 from David Stone --- Sorry, I misread the chain of comments, Jonathan Wakely's comment on gcc correctly rejecting invalid code refers specifically to the decltype example. Please ignore my previous comment, except that it captures

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 70410, which changed state. Bug 70410 Summary: no uninitialized variable warning if 'offsetof' is used in expression https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70410 What|Removed |Add

[Bug c++/70410] no uninitialized variable warning if 'offsetof' is used in expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70410 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug middle-end/81908] [8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_auto_array_2.f90 -O3 -g -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81908 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Aug 25 00:25:57 2017 New Revision: 251347 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251347&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/81908 - FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_auto_array_2.f90 -O3 -g

[Bug middle-end/81908] [8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_auto_array_2.f90 -O3 -g -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81908 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81976] New: bad is_standard_layout/has_unique_object_representations results with a chain of empty bases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81976 Bug ID: 81976 Summary: bad is_standard_layout/has_unique_object_representations results with a chain of empty bases Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status

[Bug c++/81932] Template arguments of type unsigned generate incorrect debugging information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #14) The symbols in your example are the result/ouput of demangling but the issue reported here is with the symbols that are input into GDB. There is more than one way to

[Bug c++/81977] New: Possible issue with inline memcpy with packed structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977 Bug ID: 81977 Summary: Possible issue with inline memcpy with packed structures Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/81977] Possible issue with inline memcpy with packed structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977 --- Comment #1 from vvarada at codeaurora dot org --- FYI: The issue shows up on previous versions of GCC compiler as well, as early as 4.9.2 (have not tried earlier versions). Also if the "buffer" in main is declared as a static uint8_t array,

[Bug c++/81932] Template arguments of type unsigned generate incorrect debugging information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932 --- Comment #16 from Paul Smith --- I'm not familiar with the implementations but I'm not sure we can expect GDB to be able to handle this situation, at least not with any sort of efficiency. It's already a difficult part of GDB's job, looking u

[Bug c++/81932] Template arguments of type unsigned generate incorrect debugging information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932 --- Comment #17 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #15) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #14) > > The symbols in your example are the result/ouput of demangling but the issue > reported here is with the symbols that a

[Bug fortran/81978] New: Passing component of a parameter array to a subroutine causes SIGBUS crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81978 Bug ID: 81978 Summary: Passing component of a parameter array to a subroutine causes SIGBUS crash Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/81909] Missing warning in gcc.dg/pr53037-{2,3}.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81909 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[nvptx] Missing warning in |Missing warning in |gcc

<    1   2