[Bug target/81389] _mm_cmpestri segfault on -O0

2017-08-15 Thread rockeet at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389 rockeet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/81837] New: Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

2017-08-15 Thread victor.sunye at upc dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81837 Bug ID: 81837 Summary: Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug testsuite/81807] [8 Regression] many *.cc asan tests fail

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81807 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|many *.cc asan t

[Bug middle-end/81812] [7/8 Regression] Empty virtual function fails to compile

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug target/81813] Inefficient stack pointer adjustment

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81813 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-*-* --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/81814] Incorrect behaviour at -O0 (conditional operator)

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81814 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/81810] unused strcpy to a local buffer not eliminated

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81810 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug tree-optimization/81811] missing -Wreturn-local-addr returning strcpy result

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81811 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Wonder whether the memcpy case is because we fold the memcpy away as both memcpy and strcpy are marked RET1 (returns arg1).

[Bug c/81389] _mm_cmpestri segfault on -O0

2017-08-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to rockeet from comment #11) > @H.J. Lu > > Have you tried your `solution`? > > `_mm_cmpestri` is a C function and have no overloaded with type `__m128i_u`. [hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr81389]$ cat y.c #include

[Bug tree-optimization/81814] Incorrect behaviour at -O0 (conditional operator)

2017-08-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81814 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Yes, it's in operand_equal_for_comparison_p, and that would also explain why it started with r125012. I didn't update the BZ when I found this out. I hope to look into this more this week.

[Bug tree-optimization/81790] [8 Regression] ICE in vn_nary_build_or_lookup_1, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1738

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81790 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Aug 15 11:26:32 2017 New Revision: 251103 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251103&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-15 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/81790

[Bug tree-optimization/81790] [8 Regression] ICE in vn_nary_build_or_lookup_1, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1738

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81790 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81815] Invalid conditional reduction

2017-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81815 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The branch looks affected as well.

[Bug tree-optimization/38592] Optimize memmove / memcmp combination

2017-08-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38592 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-02-19 05:44:12 |2017-8-15 Component|fortran

[Bug fortran/44350] accepts illegal fortran in BLOCK DATA

2017-08-15 Thread dibr-bugzilla at daswigwam dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44350 dbroemmel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dibr-bugzilla at daswigwam dot de --- Comme

[Bug target/79912] [7/8 regression] LRA unable to generate reloads after r245655

2017-08-15 Thread mpf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912 --- Comment #20 from mpf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Palmer: There is a commit listed for this bug, did that fix the issue and can the bug be marked fixed?

[Bug c++/45963] inconsistent and poor array initialization diagnostic

2017-08-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45963 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/81837] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

2017-08-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81837 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- *** Bug 81838 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/81838] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

2017-08-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81838 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/81837] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

2017-08-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81837 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- *** Bug 81839 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/81839] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

2017-08-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81839 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46634] cp/typeck2.c: uses BITS_PER_UNIT in lieu of TYPE_PRECISION (char_type_node)

2017-08-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46634 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 15 August 2017 at 04:10, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: >> >> I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I >> can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error >> message looks like this: Even if it were possible, the

[Bug fortran/42568] [Cygwin] BLOCKDATA referenced in EXTERNAL not loading from library

2017-08-15 Thread urbanjost at comcast dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42568 --- Comment #34 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- It still occurs with Cygwin 2.8.2, which comes with gfortran 5.4.0, which is the latest version of CygWin, if that is of any help. -Original Message- From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr [m

[Bug target/81820] -Os may remove debug info

2017-08-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81820 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/38592] Optimize memmove / memcmp combination

2017-08-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38592 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See A

[Bug tree-optimization/81811] missing -Wreturn-local-addr returning strcpy result

2017-08-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81811 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Wonder whether the memcpy case is because we fold the memcpy away as both > memcpy and strcpy are marked RET1 (returns arg1). The memcpy is eliminated in DSE and

[Bug target/81652] [meta-bug] -finstrument-control-flow -mcet bugs

2017-08-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652 Bug 81652 depends on bug 81844, which changed state. Bug 81844 Summary: -finstrument-control-flow -mcet is incompatible with makecontext family functions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81844 What|Removed

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-15 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 15/08/17 04:10, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: >> I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I >> can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error >> message looks like this: > > Bugzilla and the rest of gcc.gnu.org h

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-15 Thread Martin Sebor
On 08/15/2017 07:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 15 August 2017 at 04:10, Martin Sebor wrote: On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error message looks like

[Bug target/79912] [7/8 regression] LRA unable to generate reloads after r245655

2017-08-15 Thread palmer at dabbelt dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912 Palmer Dabbelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote: > It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840 > was created Sunday afternoon but is not in the database: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01303.html > > (Strangely, 81841 is there, as is 81839.) That's another 81839 replac

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-15 Thread Martin Sebor
On 08/15/2017 10:27 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote: It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840 was created Sunday afternoon but is not in the database: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01303.html (Strangely, 81841 is there, as is 8

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 08/15/2017 10:27 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote: > > > > > It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840 > > > was created Sunday afternoon but is not in the database: > > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug lto/81847] ICE with LTO enabled

2017-08-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81847 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Try -flto-partition=one which might allow this to be reduced further.

[Bug lto/81847] ICE with LTO enabled

2017-08-15 Thread v at vsamko dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81847 --- Comment #2 from Valentine --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Try -flto-partition=one which might allow this to be reduced further. Thanks, just tried -flto-partition=one, still the same ICE. Other -flto-partition options didn'

[Bug lto/81847] ICE with LTO enabled

2017-08-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81847 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Valentine from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > Try -flto-partition=one which might allow this to be reduced further. > > Thanks, just tried -flto-partition=one, sti

[Bug c++/67650] undef reference with -fdevirtualize

2017-08-15 Thread vincent.lextrait at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67650 --- Comment #16 from Vincent --- Still there in 7.2.0.

[Bug target/81643] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/long_branch_1.c scan-assembler Ltb

2017-08-15 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81643 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug web/81846] ViewVC Exception

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81846 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81851] New: missing -Wduplicated-branches on if and return statements with no else

2017-08-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81851 Bug ID: 81851 Summary: missing -Wduplicated-branches on if and return statements with no else Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81852] New: Feature request: __cpp_threadsafe_static_init

2017-08-15 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81852 Bug ID: 81852 Summary: Feature request: __cpp_threadsafe_static_init Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/81853] New: [C++14] "using namespace" is not a constant expression in function-like macro

2017-08-15 Thread t.poechtrager at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81853 Bug ID: 81853 Summary: [C++14] "using namespace" is not a constant expression in function-like macro Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c/81851] missing -Wduplicated-branches on if and return statements with no else

2017-08-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81851 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/78459] [7/8 Regression] [SH] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start building glibc string tests

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78459 --- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers --- At some point this ICE disappeared, both on mainline and GCC 7 branch. I haven't bisected to see when it disappeared (quite possibly before the branchpoint).

[Bug c/81854] New: weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted

2017-08-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854 Bug ID: 81854 Summary: weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/81854] weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted

2017-08-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment #1 from Marti

[Bug c/81824] Warn for missing attributes with function aliases

2017-08-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/67712] [SH] __builtin_strncmp causes code bloat

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67712 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Aug 15 23:42:23 2017 New Revision: 251108 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251108&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Limit SH strncmp inline expansion (PR target/78460). GCC mainline built

[Bug target/78460] [7/8 Regression] [SH] OOM building glibc string tst-cmp.c

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78460 --- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Aug 15 23:42:23 2017 New Revision: 251108 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251108&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Limit SH strncmp inline expansion (PR target/78460). GCC mainline built

[Bug target/67712] [SH] __builtin_strncmp causes code bloat

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67712 --- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Aug 15 23:43:11 2017 New Revision: 251109 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251109&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Limit SH strncmp inline expansion (PR target/78460). GCC mainline built

[Bug target/67712] [SH] __builtin_strncmp causes code bloat

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67712 --- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers --- The patch committed limits the unrolling, but not necessarily as much as desirable (given the bug is about an 8-byte case and the limit is 32 bytes).

[Bug target/78460] [7/8 Regression] [SH] OOM building glibc string tst-cmp.c

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78460 --- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Aug 15 23:43:11 2017 New Revision: 251109 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251109&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Limit SH strncmp inline expansion (PR target/78460). GCC mainline built

[Bug target/78460] [7/8 Regression] [SH] OOM building glibc string tst-cmp.c

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78460 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67712] [SH] __builtin_strncmp causes code bloat

2017-08-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67712 --- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers --- The patch committed limits the unrolling, but not necessarily as much as desirable (given the bug is about an 8-byte case and the limit is 32 bytes).

[Bug c++/81855] New: [mingw-w64] dllexport-ed explicit template instantiation has no symbol in DLL when the compile unit has non-template symbol

2017-08-15 Thread lanxingcan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81855 Bug ID: 81855 Summary: [mingw-w64] dllexport-ed explicit template instantiation has no symbol in DLL when the compile unit has non-template symbol Product: gcc Ve

[Bug c++/81855] [mingw-w64] dllexport-ed explicit template instantiation has no symbol in DLL when the compile unit has non-template symbol

2017-08-15 Thread lanxingcan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81855 --- Comment #1 from Xingcan Lan --- Update: Even if I seperate the them into two compile unit. and link them into one DLL together, symbols for `Template` is also missing. So maybe it's a bug of binutils?