https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 9 19:21:49 2017
New Revision: 250999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81525 - wrong constant value with generic lambda
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64546
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78860
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67586
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #7 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81398
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67054
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 9 20:17:47 2017
New Revision: 251000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67054 - Inherited ctor with non-default-constructible membe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 9 20:17:55 2017
New Revision: 251001
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251001&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81525 - wrong constant value with generic lambda
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81786
Bug ID: 81786
Summary: local restricted pointer can be relied on in alias
analysis
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> Modified:
> branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c
Reverted for now, as 7.2 is frozen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81360
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Confirmed, started with r250048.
Still going wrong, nearly a month later.
Revision 250983 seems to demonstrate the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Aug 9 21:05:45 2017
New Revision: 251004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251004&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Testcase for PR81423
gcc/testsuite/
PR rtl-optimization/814
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Aug 9 21:08:33 2017
New Revision: 251005
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251005&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Use SAVE_MULTIPLE only if we restore what it saves (PR80938)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81787
Bug ID: 81787
Summary: `#pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-fpermissive"` no
longer works since gcc 4.8
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Aug 9 21:52:30 2017
New Revision: 251011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
This time with the file added.
Testcase for PR81423
gcc/testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79391
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill ---
It builds on the gcc head and the 7 branch now.
Should we just go ahead and close this or does it matter when it was fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk for rs6000; backports pending.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81643
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||3.4.2
Summary|__basic_file:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81788
Bug ID: 81788
Summary: address of a local variable escapes too early
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81788
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Dup of bug 23384 I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81687
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Aug 10 00:33:20 2017
New Revision: 251019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81687
* omp-low.c (omp_copy_decl): Don't remap FORCED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81789
Bug ID: 81789
Summary: CWG1687 performed too soon
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81788
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
As a data point, Clang manages to optimize at least the simple case in bug
81788 as expected. No other compiler I've tested does (IBM XLC, Intel ICC,
Visual Studio, or Sun/Oracle Studio).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81776
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
