https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(lldb) b main
Breakpoint 2: where = a.out`main at pr25967-1.c:55, address =
0x00010f4f
(lldb) disass -a 0x00010f4f
a.out`main:
0x10f4f <+0>: pushq $0x12345675 ;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81700
Bug ID: 81700
Summary: Unresolved function type when taking address of
operator() of generic lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> (lldb) b main
> Breakpoint 2: where = a.out`main at pr25967-1.c:55, address =
> 0x00010f4f
> (lldb) disass -a 0x00010f4f
> a.out`main:
> 0x1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81701
Bug ID: 81701
Summary: -fstack-arrays hehavior does not match documentation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52673
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842
Bug 29842 depends on bug 30065, which changed state.
Bug 30065 Summary: Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #9)
>
> Did this fix things?
No, not entirely. The whole config/cpu/sh/atomicity.h header should not be
required, but because of PR 53579, it is.
Please do not close a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81695
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
I hope this is what you had in mind:
--- a/gcc/fold-const.c
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.c
@@ -14106,14 +14106,17 @@ fold_indirect_ref_1 (location_t loc, tree type, tree
op0)
&& type == TREE_TYPE (op00typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #3)
> > > Is there a test case for this PR?
> >
> > Reporter never provided
ng an ICE in gcc-7 and gcc-8. Only
happens with -O2.
$ g++
g++ (GCC) 7.1.1 20170803
$ g++ -c -O2 -std=gnu++11 t.i
t.i:107:33: internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable, at
gimple-fold.c:6442
Resource_factory_t _x;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81617
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Aug 3 18:09:12 2017
New Revision: 250858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81617
libgo: change mksigtab to recognize glibc 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81703
Bug ID: 81703
Summary: memcpy folding defeats strlen optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81617
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77799
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
This bug was fixed along with the related pr77671 in r248035. GCC 8.0 now
prints the following:
.c: In function ‘g’:
a.c:14:15: warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
sprintf (d, "12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81704
Bug ID: 81704
Summary: strncpy folding defeats strlen optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50360
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705
Bug ID: 81705
Summary: UBSAN: yet another false positive
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
>This is a 8 only regression. It has nothing to do with 7.2.
Curiouser and curiouser.
Richard Biener has just posted that 7.2-rc1 has been created from
revision 250819.
The small chunk of code I posted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706
Bug ID: 81706
Summary: std::sin vectorization bug
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81538
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 41919
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41919&action=edit
Somewhat reduced preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81707
Bug ID: 81707
Summary: Type parameter inquiry errors
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 41920
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41920&action=edit
A binutils patch
This binutils patch adds R_X86_64_GPREL to assembler and linker. It
supports:
.text
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50360
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> Created attachment 41920 [details]
> A binutils patch
>
With this patch:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 587dbe61e8b..953c153a834 1006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68094
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490
--- Comment #19 from H. Peter Anvin ---
So the Linux kernel, right now, basically does (b); we'd like to do something
more like (a).
Because the stack canary (which is a percpu variable in the Linux kernel) is
hard-coded in gcc to be %gs:0x28, m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68229
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490
--- Comment #20 from Andy Lutomirski ---
We have issues putting modules more than 2G from the main kernel no matter
what, but I don't see what this has to do with %gs addressing.
I still think that GCC should let us directly control the addressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
Bug ID: 81708
Summary: The x86 stack canary location should be customizable
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490
--- Comment #21 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Re: the stack canary, I filed bug 81708. It seems to me that __seg_gs is
analogous and users should be able to directly specify the addressing mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490
--- Comment #22 from H. Peter Anvin ---
There are other issues, too (we'd have to drop the kernel memory model,
probably replace it with the small-pic model) but %gs: addressing is one of
those.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
H. Peter Anvin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hpa at zytor dot com
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
--- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski ---
(In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #1)
> Well, you can choose between "__stack_chk_guard(%rip)" and "%gs:40"... :)
Wow, I guess I didn't even consider the former. That would be option 5:
symbol(%rip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42568
--- Comment #31 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
It may be of interest that the original application where this was encountered
was changed to use modules, which I have had no similar problem with on Cygwin;
but that the bug1.sh attachment st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68229
--- Comment #6 from Todd Allen ---
They released a patch last year:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278872
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81680
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> This bug might better be filed at sourceware.org/bugzilla
Except the demangler main sources are located in gcc rather than binutils.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68229
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35758
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57426
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81665
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81707
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81709
Bug ID: 81709
Summary: __attribute__((interrupt)) should handle SSE registers
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
101 - 148 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
