[Bug c++/81574] New: ICE on valid C++14 code: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81574 Bug ID: 81574 Summary: ICE on valid C++14 code: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2481 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/81575] New: ICE on C++ code: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:5793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81575 Bug ID: 81575 Summary: ICE on C++ code: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:5793 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81558] Loop not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81558 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 27 Jul 2017, kugan at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81558 > > --- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- > > > Does LLVM do a runtime alias

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Jul 27 07:31:19 2017 New Revision: 250603 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250603&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport r249728 2017-07-27 Martin Liska Backport from mainli

[Bug sanitizer/81186] SIGSEGV when using Address Sanitizer with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81186 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Jul 27 07:32:53 2017 New Revision: 250605 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250605&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport r250561 2017-07-27 Martin Liska Backport from mainli

[Bug sanitizer/81021] stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 --- Comment #30 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Jul 27 07:32:15 2017 New Revision: 250604 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250604&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport r249833 2017-07-27 Martin Liska Backport from mainl

[Bug c++/81575] ICE on C++ code: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:5793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|

[Bug testsuite/81576] New: New testcase g++.dg/ipa/pr80212.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81576 Bug ID: 81576 Summary: New testcase g++.dg/ipa/pr80212.C fails Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug c++/81574] ICE on valid C++14 code: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81574 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking, |

[Bug sanitizer/81186] SIGSEGV when using Address Sanitizer with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81186 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug sanitizer/81021] stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/81571] [8 Regression] ICE at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81571 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/81548] "make distclean" does not clean all of gotools/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81548 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- Yup, that does the trick. Thanks Ian.

[Bug c/81577] New: -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 causes spurious “this ‘else’ clause does not guard” with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81577 Bug ID: 81577 Summary: -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 causes spurious “this ‘else’ clause does not guard” with -Wall Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/81576] New testcase g++.dg/ipa/pr80212.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81576 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81578] New: [8 Regression] ICE in omp_reduction_init_op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81578 Bug ID: 81578 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in omp_reduction_init_op Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Pr

[Bug middle-end/21111] IA-64 NaT consumption faults due to uninitialized register reads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/81447] [7/8] gfortran fails to recognize the exact dynamic type of a polymorphic entity that was allocated in a external procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81447 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug sanitizer/81579] New: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:37:15: error: conflicting declaration ‘typedef __gid_t __kernel_gid_t’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81579 Bug ID: 81579 Summary: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:37:15: error: conflicting declaration ‘typedef __gid_t __kernel_gid_t’ Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0

[Bug sanitizer/81302] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault in diagnose_tm_1 at trans-mem.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81302 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Jul 27 08:38:35 2017 New Revision: 250608 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250608&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Subject: Backport r250271 2017-07-27 Martin Liska Backport fr

[Bug sanitizer/81302] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault in diagnose_tm_1 at trans-mem.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81302 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 27 08:49:16 2017 New Revision: 250609 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250609&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81555 PR tree-optimization/81556

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 27 08:49:16 2017 New Revision: 250609 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250609&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81555 PR tree-optimization/81556

[Bug target/81580] New: [ARM] C++ zero-sized array generates undefined instruction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81580 Bug ID: 81580 Summary: [ARM] C++ zero-sized array generates undefined instruction. Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug fortran/81581] New: runtime checks for DIM argument of intrinsic SUM missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81581 Bug ID: 81581 Summary: runtime checks for DIM argument of intrinsic SUM missing Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 27 09:06:08 2017 New Revision: 250610 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250610&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81555 PR tree-optimization/81556

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 27 09:06:08 2017 New Revision: 250610 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250610&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81555 PR tree-optimization/81556

[Bug fortran/81581] runtime checks for DIM argument of intrinsic SUM missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81581 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81580] [ARM] C++ zero-sized array generates undefined instruction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81580 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 27 09:32:33 2017 New Revision: 250612 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250612&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81555 PR tree-optimization/81556

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 27 09:32:33 2017 New Revision: 250612 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250612&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81555 PR tree-optimization/81556

[Bug c++/71570] [6/7 regression] ICE on invalid variable capture in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71570 --- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Jul 27 09:36:37 2017 New Revision: 250614 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250614&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2017-07-27 Paolo Carlini PR c++/71570

[Bug c++/71570] [6 regression] ICE on invalid variable capture in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:55

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71570 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 regression] ICE on |[6 regression] ICE on

[Bug middle-end/21111] IA-64 NaT consumption faults due to uninitialized register reads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|INVALID

[Bug other/81582] New: -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 Bug ID: 81582 Summary: -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 27 09:43:01 2017 New Revision: 250616 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250616&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81555 PR tree-optimization/81556

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 27 09:43:01 2017 New Revision: 250616 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250616&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81555 PR tree-optimization/81556

[Bug fortran/81581] runtime checks for DIM argument of intrinsic SUM missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81581 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/79821] [7 regression] SEGV in cc1plus compiling 64-bit stdc++.h.gch/O2g.gch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment #15

[Bug pch/78508] valgrind error in gt_pch_note_object when compiling C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78508 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Martin Lišk

[Bug other/81582] -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/81583] New: Compilation error in gcc-4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81583 Bug ID: 81583 Summary: Compilation error in gcc-4.9 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other As

[Bug other/81583] Compilation error in gcc-4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81583 Ruben Emanuel Nechifor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruben.nechifor at ubbcluj dot r

[Bug testsuite/81576] New testcase g++.dg/ipa/pr80212.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81576 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Ok, we need to backport r248489 which removes the test-case and adds new constraint to the parameter. I've just asked for permission to backport the patch.

[Bug debug/81570] create_pseudo_cfg assumes that INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET is a constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81570 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 41846 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41846&action=edit A patch I am testing this patch.

[Bug debug/81570] create_pseudo_cfg assumes that INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET is a constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81570 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/34455] Request warning for casts to _Bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34455 --- Comment #5 from H. Peter Anvin --- 10 years have passed since the original request. These days compilers that don't have any support for bool at all can be genuinely considered rare at the very best. I don't think it is applicable anymore.

[Bug tree-optimization/81578] [8 Regression] ICE in omp_reduction_init_op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81578 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/81534] [7/8 Regression] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81534 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Thu Jul 27 10:39:49 2017 New Revision: 250617 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250617&root=gcc&view=rev Log: S/390: Fix PR81534 The HI/QI atomic_fetch_" expander accepted symboli

[Bug target/81534] [7/8 Regression] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81534 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Thu Jul 27 10:42:22 2017 New Revision: 250618 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250618&root=gcc&view=rev Log: S/390: Fix PR81534 The HI/QI atomic_fetch_" expander accepted symboli

[Bug target/81534] [7/8 Regression] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81534 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81578] [8 Regression] ICE in omp_reduction_init_op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81578 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81578] [8 Regression] ICE in omp_reduction_init_op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81578 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c/81306] valgrind error for function warn_for_multistatement_macros in file c-warn.c line 2474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Actually, while fixing PR81448 I removed that hunk of code completely, so that might fix this, too. Will test this after the usual testing.

[Bug c/34455] Request warning for casts to _Bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34455 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/32838] gcc generates incorrect trampoline code in thumb mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED

[Bug middle-end/81502] In some cases the data is moved to memory unnecessarily [partial regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81502 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jul 27 12:01:21 2017 New Revision: 250620 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250620&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/81502

[Bug middle-end/81502] In some cases the data is moved to memory unnecessarily [partial regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81502 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/81578] [8 Regression] ICE in omp_reduction_init_op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81578 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- #1 0x00db5299 in omp_reduction_init_op (loc=2147483656, op=COND_EXPR, type=) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/omp-low.c:3417 3417 gcc_unreachable (); (gdb) l 3412

[Bug other/81583] Compilation error in gcc-4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81583 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81494] [8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -Ofast after r249919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81494 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/81576] New testcase g++.dg/ipa/pr80212.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81576 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/42204] update_eliminables should be called in reload after something changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42204 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/56183] [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Bug 56183 depends on bug 42204, which changed state. Bug 42204 Summary: update_eliminables should be called in reload after something changes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42204 What|Removed |Add

[Bug debug/56234] Get "internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:18906" with -g option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56234 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/39760] register allocation costs are not well described on AVR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39760 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/81578] [8 Regression] ICE in omp_reduction_init_op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81578 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug other/81583] Compilation error in gcc-4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81583 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/57166] Manual no longer documents -Wmissing-noreturn alias for -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57166 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFI

[Bug other/81582] -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug other/81582] -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or avoid using comments and use attributes instead. This is all documented.

[Bug other/81582] -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/60170] No -Wtype-limits warning with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60170 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2014-02-19 00:00:00 |2017-7-27 CC|

[Bug c/60614] -Wtype-limits fails to warn on unsigned bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60614 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug other/81582] -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/81571] [8 Regression] ICE at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81571 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jul 27 13:44:51 2017 New Revision: 250626 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250626&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/81571

[Bug tree-optimization/81571] [8 Regression] ICE at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81571 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81494] [8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -Ofast after r249919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81494 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jul 27 13:46:07 2017 New Revision: 250627 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250627&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/81573

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jul 27 13:46:07 2017 New Revision: 250627 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250627&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/81573

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81494] [8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -Ofast after r249919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81494 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug c++/81574] ICE on valid C++14 code: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81574 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/81574] ICE on valid C++14 code: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81574 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Bet the initializer isn't through function-to-pointer conversion (decay_conversion or whatever else invokes it), but no idea where that should be done etc.

[Bug other/81582] -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- If you are preprocessing without -C and without -fdirectives-only, then comments are gone, so you really can't use them to inhibit the warning.

[Bug c/61727] #pragma simd is undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61727 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFI

[Bug libstdc++/81584] New: Pretty Printer for string* doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81584 Bug ID: 81584 Summary: Pretty Printer for string* doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug middle-end/81564] ICE in group_case_labels_stmt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81564 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Jul 27 14:05:14 2017 New Revision: 250628 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250628&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/81564 * tree-cfg.c (group_case_labels

[Bug middle-end/81564] ICE in group_case_labels_stmt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81564 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81564] ICE in group_case_labels_stmt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81564 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner

[Bug other/81582] -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > If you are preprocessing without -C and without -fdirectives-only, then > comments are gone, so you really can't use them to inhibit the warning. Yes, so -Wim

[Bug c++/81575] [7/8 Regression] ICE on C++ code: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:5793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81575 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug other/81582] -Wimplicit-fallthrough= wrong warning with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- The reason it is shown in the diagnostics is that the diagnostic code opens the original, non-preprocessed source (if available) and prints the line from there. If you don't have the source around, say compil

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- And it is run multiple times which means make check takes forever. WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr81573.c -O0 execution test . . . WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg/t

[Bug c++/81574] ICE on valid C++14 code: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81574 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/81306] valgrind error for function warn_for_multistatement_macros in file c-warn.c line 2474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The problem in the test case is that the code assumes "char" is signed. On power it is not. So "b" starts at 0, is decremented to 255, and ...etc... The for loop will run forever.

[Bug sanitizer/81021] stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 --- Comment #32 from Matt Godbolt --- Thanks! One thing, I probably misunderstand this, but you've put 7.1 in "known to work" above: is this on purpose? 7.1 is the version the issue comes up in, I assume it'll be fixed in an upcoming 7.2 release?

  1   2   >