[Bug swing/38198] DefaultTableColumnModel.java: redundant call to new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38198 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gjdoc/38191] gjdoc/Main.java: dead local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38191 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug xml/38189] Java: set but not used local variable in tight loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38189 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug classpath/38192] SwingCallbackHandler.java: remove unused local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38192 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug classpath/38195] ClassRmicCompiler.java: remove unused variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38195 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug classpath/38193] HashMap.java: unused local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38193 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug swing/38194] DefaultListSelectionModel.java: remove dead for loop ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38194 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug classpath/38176] Java: 4 * use of toUpperCase/toLowerCase().equals()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38176 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug classpath/38197] JobSheetsSupported.java: unused local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38197 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78401] SciMark v2.0 Composite test runs 1,5 times slower under GCC 6.2 than under Clang 3.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78401 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/38841] valgrind finds problem for broken C++ code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38841 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/79703] [meta-bug] SciMark 2.0 performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79703 Bug 79703 depends on bug 78401, which changed state. Bug 78401 Summary: SciMark v2.0 Composite test runs 1,5 times slower under GCC 6.2 than under Clang 3.9 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78401 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/78402] SciMark v2.0 Dense LU Matrix Factorization test runs more than 2 times slower under GCC 6.2 than under Clang 3.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78402 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/79703] [meta-bug] SciMark 2.0 performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79703 Bug 79703 depends on bug 78402, which changed state. Bug 78402 Summary: SciMark v2.0 Dense LU Matrix Factorization test runs more than 2 times slower under GCC 6.2 than under Clang 3.9 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78402

[Bug middle-end/78404] SciMark v2.0 Sparse Matrix Multiply test is 20% slower under GCC 6.2 than under Clang 3.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78404 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/79703] [meta-bug] SciMark 2.0 performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79703 Bug 79703 depends on bug 78403, which changed state. Bug 78403 Summary: SciMark v2.0 Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation test is 30% slower under GCC 6.2 than under Clang 3.9 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78403 What|R

[Bug middle-end/78403] SciMark v2.0 Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation test is 30% slower under GCC 6.2 than under Clang 3.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78403 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/79703] [meta-bug] SciMark 2.0 performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79703 Bug 79703 depends on bug 78404, which changed state. Bug 78404 Summary: SciMark v2.0 Sparse Matrix Multiply test is 20% slower under GCC 6.2 than under Clang 3.9 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78404 What|Removed

[Bug other/79703] [meta-bug] SciMark 2.0 performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79703 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Please note that Phoronix SciMark 2.0 benchmark is faulty [1]. [1] https://kristerw.blogspot.si/2017/07/phoronix-scimark-benchmarking-results.html

[Bug tree-optimization/43424] -O2 -floop-parallelize-all causes verify_stmts failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43424 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/38518] Excessive compile time with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518 --- Comment #12 from David Binderman --- With recent gcc: no -O flag: 2 seconds -O2: 24 seconds -O3: 247 seconds I'll have a look at -ftime-report.

[Bug rtl-optimization/60668] simplify-rtx.c:1676: minor tidyup in if ... else chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60668 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81524] Bogus or missing warnings when dereferencing pointer to deallocated stack memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81524 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Fredrik Hederstierna from comment #3) > Isn't AddressSanitizer checking in run-time? There are several tools that > can find this bugs in runtime I think like Valgrind, but I need to find this > a

[Bug c/81524] Bogus or missing warnings when dereferencing pointer to deallocated stack memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81524 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > No, it verifies stuff just in compile time. Well I understand the arm-eabi Sorry, 'just in run-time'.

[Bug tree-optimization/63822] tree-chkp.c: missing init for local variable found_valid ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63822 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/61145] valgrind finds problems in ipa_analyze_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61145 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/66600] sign_mask meets valgrind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66600 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug boehm-gc/66884] trunk/boehm-gc/cord/cordbscs.c:455: bad if ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66884 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71570] [6/7/8 regression] ICE on invalid variable capture in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71570 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/49409] some possible new warnings for strange code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/81559] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 4 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition) on 32-bit BE powerpc target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81559 Bug ID: 81559 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 4 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition) on 32-bit BE powerpc

[Bug libgcc/66883] config/epiphany/udivsi3-float.c:52: bad if test ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66883 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/69084] lra-remat.c:165: dead function ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69084 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/69085] gcc/emit-rtl.c:2671: dead function ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69085 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/61152] Missing GCC Runtime Library Exception in some files that are included in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61152 --- Comment #8 from sh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sh Date: Wed Jul 26 08:31:09 2017 New Revision: 250558 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250558&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [RTEMS] Add GCC Runtime Library Exception gcc/ PR libgcc/6115

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/81455] [7 Regression] Compile-time hog w/ -O1 -funswitch-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81455 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 26 08:36:34 2017 New Revision: 250560 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250560&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-26 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug c++/81410] [5/6/7 Regression] -O3 breaks code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 26 08:36:34 2017 New Revision: 250560 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250560&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-26 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug target/81175] [7 Regression] EXC_BAD_ACCESS in ::slpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges(edge, edge, edge, edge) at is-a.h:192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81175 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 26 08:36:34 2017 New Revision: 250560 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250560&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-26 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug sanitizer/81505] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:95 with -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81505 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 26 08:36:34 2017 New Revision: 250560 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250560&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-26 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug libstdc++/80721] Sorting/Merging of free EH-emergency buffer may wrong or uncomplete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80721 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 26 08:36:34 2017 New Revision: 250560 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250560&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-07-26 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug libstdc++/80721] Sorting/Merging of free EH-emergency buffer may wrong or uncomplete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80721 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/70693] valgrind error in get_visual_column

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70693 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81455] [7 Regression] Compile-time hog w/ -O1 -funswitch-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81455 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/81175] [7 Regression] EXC_BAD_ACCESS in ::slpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges(edge, edge, edge, edge) at is-a.h:192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81175 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug other/71325] intl/dcigettext.c:588]: (style) Redundant condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71325 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81550] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/loop_align.c fails starting with r250482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/81554] [8 Regression] 25% performance regression in Himeno benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81554 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/65628] valgrind error in improve_allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65628 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/81520] [8 Regression] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa-visibility.c:639

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81520 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/81186] SIGSEGV when using Address Sanitizer with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81186 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug sanitizer/81186] SIGSEGV when using Address Sanitizer with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81186 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Jul 26 08:52:37 2017 New Revision: 250561 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250561&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Move non-local goto expansion after parm_birth_insn (PR sanitize/81186).

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug c/57961] Excessive memory use with -O0 ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57961 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/81487] [mingw32] ld.exe: error: asprintf failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Jul 26 08:58:37 2017 New Revision: 250562 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250562&root=gcc&view=rev Log: lto-plugin/ Backport from 2017-07-21 trunk r250428. PR lt

[Bug libgcc/78779] libgcc/soft-fp/op-common.h:900: possible missing break ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78779 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/78508] valgrind error in gt_pch_note_object when compiling C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78508 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/81487] [mingw32] ld.exe: error: asprintf failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.2

[Bug tree-optimization/80613] [8 Regression] ICE in is_gimple_reg_type with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80613 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/81559] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 4 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition) on 32-bit BE powerpc target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81559 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mil

[Bug c/81306] valgrind error for function warn_for_multistatement_macros in file c-warn.c line 2474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- I've reproduced the issue but don't know what to do about it, it doesn't seem to be a bug in the warning. I looks like the macro maps contains holes: cc1: note: token 77 has x-location == y-location == 0

[Bug c/81306] valgrind error for function warn_for_multistatement_macros in file c-warn.c line 2474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- And I wonder if that's what this comment in dump_location_info talks about: 1187 for (unsigned int i = 0; i < MACRO_MAP_NUM_MACRO_TOKENS (map); i++) 1188 { 1189 source_location x = MA

[Bug tree-optimization/81558] Loop not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81558 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/81306] valgrind error for function warn_for_multistatement_macros in file c-warn.c line 2474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/38518] Excessive compile time with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Also look at gcc.opensuse.org/ in the c++bench "random" part. At -O2 it shows df live&initialized regs: 12.12 (31%) usr backwards jump threading: 6.44 (17%) usr the backwards jump threading thing

[Bug c/81543] attribute may_alias on function and variable declarations silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81543 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/38518] Excessive compile time with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug c/81543] attribute may_alias on function and variable declarations silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81543 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- But adding one wouldn't help because 487 /* If we require a type, but were passed a decl, set up to make a 488 new type and update the one in the decl. ATTR_FLAG_TYPE_IN_PLACE 489 wo

[Bug c/81453] relational expression involving null pointer not diagnosed with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81453 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/81453] relational expression involving null pointer not diagnosed with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81453 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|mpolacek at gcc d

[Bug fortran/81552] -finit-integer=n is restricted to 32-bit INTEGER.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41832 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41832&action=edit gcc8-pr81556.patch Untested fix. The current code whether a SSA_NAME can be reused or not is based on whether

[Bug libgcc/78779] libgcc/soft-fp/op-common.h:900: possible missing break ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78779 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Resolut

[Bug fortran/81499] internal compiler error when compiling gfortran code with user-defined derived type i/o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81499 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81554] [8 Regression] 25% performance regression in Himeno benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81554 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41833 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41833&action=edit patch While we do this transform late with the attached patch it doesn't help (noisy) performance. Before:

[Bug fortran/81411] intrinsic polymorphic assignment run time error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81411 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/38518] Excessive compile time with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518 --- Comment #15 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #12) > With recent gcc: > > no -O flag: 2 seconds > > -O2: 24 seconds > > -O3: 247 seconds Those numbers for a version of trunk gcc with lots of checking. Wit

[Bug middle-end/46932] Inefficient code sequence to access local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46932 --- Comment #5 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Jul 26 10:49:17 2017 New Revision: 250564 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250564&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR46932: Block auto increment on frame pointer Block auto increment on frame

[Bug ipa/81293] sanitized g++ crashes heap-use-after-free gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors_format.inc:543 in printf_common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81293 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug sanitizer/81275] [5/6/7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=thread produce incorrect -Wreturn-type warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81275 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/81553] [7/8 Regression] ICE in immed_wide_int_const, at emit-rtl.c:607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81553 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/81541] Potential size optimisation: reusing common function endings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81541 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mliska at suse dot cz | Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c/79153] -Wimplicit-fallthrough missed warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79153 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- No WONTFIX, we ought to be able to handle this.

[Bug sanitizer/81275] [5/6/7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=thread produce incorrect -Wreturn-type warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81275 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Marek, could we reuse the fallthrough warning infrastructure for this to > determine whether there is a possible fallthrough or not? > Though, trying: > int > foo

[Bug target/79793] Incorrect stack alignment for interrupt handler in 64-bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41830|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/70992] Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and fold_binary_loc w/ -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70992 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jul 26 11:53:17 2017 New Revision: 250566 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250566&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/70992 * tree.c (build2_stat): Don't set T

[Bug target/79041] aarch64 backend emits R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocation despite -mpc-relative-literal-loads option being used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79041 --- Comment #10 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Jul 26 11:55:03 2017 New Revision: 250567 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250567&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Disable pr79041-2.c with -mabi=ilp32. gcc/testsuite/ PR target/79041

[Bug middle-end/70992] Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and fold_binary_loc w/ -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70992 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/70992] Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and fold_binary_loc w/ -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70992 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79041] aarch64 backend emits R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocation despite -mpc-relative-literal-loads option being used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79041 --- Comment #11 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Jul 26 11:57:57 2017 New Revision: 250569 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250569&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Disable pr79041-2.c with -mabi=ilp32. gcc/testsuite/ PR target/79041

[Bug web/81560] New: Error in C documentation regarding min/max substitute macros MIN/MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81560 Bug ID: 81560 Summary: Error in C documentation regarding min/max substitute macros MIN/MAX Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] New: [7/8 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 Bug ID: 81561 Summary: [7/8 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument Product: gcc Version: 7.0 URL: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050487 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7/8 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 41836 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41836&action=edit gcda file

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7/8 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7/8 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/54072] BOZ with -std=f2008: wrongly accepted to TRANSFER/ABS/...; two BOZ not rejected for IOR/IEOR/IAND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54072 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- See also pr81509.

[Bug fortran/81509] Wrong compilation error: iand/ieor/ior + boz + -std=f2008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81509 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   3   >