https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81505
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 25 07:04:07 2017
New Revision: 250494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-25 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/81505
* fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81542
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That macro is for internal use only, you're not allowed to define or undefine
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[5/6/7/8 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81543
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|Target: x86_64-redhat-linux |x86_64-redhat-linux
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81546
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, both testcases consume a very large amount of memory...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81541
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81540
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81538
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Any other compiler versions to put in known-to-work/fail?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81537
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81534
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
Summary|[7 Regression] I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81533
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think there's a separate PR with the suggestion to try constexpr evaluation
of all constructors for optimization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81529
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81530
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81546
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Babokin ---
Reduced test case consumes about 11Gb. That's a lot and looks like it's just
the consequence of the real problem. But the test case in #81488 consumes 128Gb
and dies on my machine because of lack of availabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81523
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81520
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81510
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81546
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Note the immediate use verification error is
/* Avoid infinite loops. 50,000,000 uses probably indicates a
problem. */
if (count++ > 5000)
goto error;
which is spurious,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81510
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 81537 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81537
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81414
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Jul 25 08:31:22 2017
New Revision: 250496
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250496&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81414
* config/aarch64/cortex-a57-fma-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65068
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to amker from comment #4)
> Fixed now, we now generates below code for a72/a57:
> .L4:
> ldr w0, [x1]
> add w0, w0, 1
> str w0, [x1], 4
> cmp x1, x2
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #20 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Dominik Schmidt from comment #18)
> Created attachment 41803 [details]
> Patch working for us
>
> Indeed, it seems to be a duplicate of the other bug.
That is good news - thank you for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
--- Comment #10 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Jul 25 08:56:26 2017
New Revision: 250497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from 2017-07-20 trunk r250384.
PR tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
--- Comment #11 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backport to gcc-7-branch with test cases slightly adjusted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81540
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr |avr,x86_64
--- Comment #2 from Georg-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81548
Bug ID: 81548
Summary: "make distclean" does not clean all of gotools/
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81529
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so we have an induction that's only used outside of the loop (well,
-fno-tree-scev-cprop ...) and this causes the VF to be reset to 1 as the
induction
computation is vect_unused_in_scope (should be used_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80956
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81455
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80774
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80778
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81364
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jul 25 09:49:08 2017
New Revision: 250498
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250498&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81364
* c-parser.c (c_parser_else_body): Don't war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81364
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81073
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
PR81364 is fixed, do you still see any false positives?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81212
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81540
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Estimating the size for non-switch converted switches is going to be really
> hard.
The point is that with -fno-tree-switch-conversion there is no switch at a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|mips-sde-elf|mips-sde-elf, x86_64-*-*
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80774
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 09:59:44 2017
New Revision: 250499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250499&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR 81487
* hsa-brig.c (brig_init): Use xasprintf ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80778
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61152
--- Comment #7 from sh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sh
Date: Tue Jul 25 10:06:23 2017
New Revision: 250500
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250500&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTEMS] Add GCC Runtime Library Exception
gcc/
PR libgcc/611
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81523
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 41825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41825&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81520
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jul 25 10:20:23 2017
New Revision: 250501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix wrong condition in ipa-visibility.c (PR ipa/81520).
2017-07-25 Marti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[7 Regression] nu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58861
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58750
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
*** Bug 58750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80956
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81056
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Component|libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81073
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81212
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81226
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81228
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81395
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81455
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81534
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81455
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so we end up running in circles in find_loop_guard
gcond *cond;
do
{
if (single_succ_p (header))
header = single_succ (header);
else
{
cond = dyn_cast (las
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81303
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 25 10:59:15 2017
New Revision: 250503
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250503&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-25 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81303
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 41826
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41826&action=edit
Adjust INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET for TYPE_EXCEPTION functions
How about something like attached patch? The patch a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81510
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81510
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 25 11:02:32 2017
New Revision: 250504
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250504&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-25 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81510
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81427
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81546
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 25 11:05:55 2017
New Revision: 250505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250505&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-25 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/81546
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81414
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Fixed on trunk I suppose.
Yes, I will wait then backport it to 6/7 next Monday if no regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Fixed?
Not sure; the middle-end (rtlanal.c::insn_rtx_cost, seq_cost) are still
bypassing PARALLELs with more than 1 SET, i.e. assume cost of 1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 25 11:28:08 2017
New Revision: 250506
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250506&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-25 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81410
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo