[Bug target/44002] need to #include unistd.h for pid_t on alpha-dec-vms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002 --- Comment #2 from jayk123 at hotmail dot com --- The ifndef pid_t makes it a little unconvincing. I'll see if I can find my alpha-dec-vms sysroot -- and resume trying to get this target working -- I had gotten as far as building the canadian cro

[Bug target/81504] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7 regression: vec_st in loop misoptimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81504 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81495] Building Ada on Linux m68k natively fails with obscure linker errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81495 --- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) > > Looks like the compiler itself is not functioning properly. > > Do you mean the cross-compiled native compiler or the cross-compiler itself? The c

[Bug rtl-optimization/47582] Combine chains of movl into movq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582 Tony Poppleton changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2017-7-22 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47582] Combine chains of movl into movq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/47582] Combine chains of movl into movq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582 Tony changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|2017-07-22 00:00:00

[Bug rtl-optimization/47582] Combine chains of movl into movq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for

[Bug tree-optimization/81510] [8 Regression] ice in operator[], at vec.h:749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81510 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Fault seems to between revision 250378 and 250387.

[Bug tree-optimization/81510] [8 Regression] ice in operator[], at vec.h:749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81510 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/45928] genattrtab is too slow.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45928 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jay from comment #4) > Sorry wrong thread. > I see you already found it, but for anyone else confused, the "right" thread was bug 44002

[Bug libstdc++/81468] [DR1177] is_constructible gives the wrong answer for time_point construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81468 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|is_constructible gives the |[DR1177] is_constructible

[Bug fortran/62278] gfc_check_dependency should also check for TARGET attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62278 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koeni

[Bug c++/81410] [5/6/7 Regression] -O3 breaks code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 from

[Bug c++/81514] g++.dg/lookup/missing-std-include-2.C FAILs on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/81514] New: g++.dg/lookup/missing-std-include-2.C FAILs on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514 Bug ID: 81514 Summary: g++.dg/lookup/missing-std-include-2.C FAILs on Solaris Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug preprocessor/81515] New: C pre-processor allows invalid words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81515 Bug ID: 81515 Summary: C pre-processor allows invalid words Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor

[Bug bootstrap/81037] Xcode 9 requires back ports on gcc-5-branch for bootstrapping under Xcode 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug preprocessor/81515] C pre-processor allows invalid words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81515 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/43878] Building a cross gcc fails due to a bug in the build process

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43878 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/52509] target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/54447] gmp in source does not work on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54447 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81516] New: Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81516 Bug ID: 81516 Summary: Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targ

[Bug target/81516] Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81516 --- Comment #1 from Davin McCall --- (triggers with -march=prescott|haswell, not with -march=i686)

[Bug libstdc++/81517] New: Unhelpful what() for uninitialized threads backend (in __gthread_once)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81517 Bug ID: 81517 Summary: Unhelpful what() for uninitialized threads backend (in __gthread_once) Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/56311] gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/51450] configure's test for -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51450 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jay.krell at cornell dot edu --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/56364] autoconf compiler switches are also used to link and they can fail (-fno-rtti -fno-exceptions Solaris cc/ld)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56364 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/62029] Requesting new warning: missing const-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62029 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/81518] New: missing warning on a violation of attribute const requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81518 Bug ID: 81518 Summary: missing warning on a violation of attribute const requirements Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/81518] missing warning on a violation of attribute const requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81518 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #2 from Davin McCall --- Still happening in 7.1. -march=core2 suppresses, generation of the problematic instruction happens with -march=haswell.

[Bug c/81518] missing warning on a violation of attribute const requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81518 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/18487] Warnings for pure and const functions that are not actually pure or const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18487 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 81518 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/81518] missing warning on a violation of attribute const requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81518 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug bootstrap/80047] fixincludes/fixincl.c: PVS-Studio: Improper Release of Memory Before Removing Last Reference (CWE-401)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80047 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug bootstrap/56311] gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311 devurandom at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug c++/81508] Control reaches end of non-void function - warning not emitted when optimization is turned on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81508 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/81519] New: Enhancement: Add --help=target-distcc or similar to dump clean, optimal CFLAGS without using -march=native

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81519 Bug ID: 81519 Summary: Enhancement: Add --help=target-distcc or similar to dump clean, optimal CFLAGS without using -march=native Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug other/39851] gcc -Q --help=target does not list extensions selected by -march=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot com --- Comme

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 41810 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41810&action=edit Proposed patch Can you please test attached patch?

[Bug target/81516] Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81516 mednafen at sent dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mednafen at sent dot com --- C

[Bug target/81516] Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81516 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Most likely a dup of bug 323.

[Bug target/81516] Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81516 --- Comment #4 from Davin McCall --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Most likely a dup of bug 323. I don't think so, unless I'm misunderstanding something. There's no rounding in the test case, just a store of an int value to a dou

[Bug target/81516] Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81516 --- Comment #5 from mednafen at sent dot com --- Generated assembly looks like it's grabbing garbage off the stack and writing it to b: a: subl$20, %esp fildl 24(%esp) movsd (%esp), %xmm1 movsd %xmm1, b

[Bug preprocessor/81515] C pre-processor allows invalid words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81515 Tavian Barnes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tavianator at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/81516] Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81516 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to mednafen from comment #2) > Created attachment 41811 [details] > alternate, further reduced test case Works OK for me with: -O2 -m32 -march=i686 -msse2 -mfpmath=387 a: subl$20, %esp

[Bug preprocessor/81515] C pre-processor allows invalid words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81515 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the C preprocessor makes "#ele" valid if under a #if 0 section.

[Bug c++/81513] __has_cpp_attribute returns non-zero in C++03 mode, but attributes don't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81513 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The C++11 attribute syntax isn't supported in C++03 mode, but the noreturn attribute is supported using the GNU attribute syntax (and has been for years) so it's right for that to be non-zero. I'm not sure

[Bug preprocessor/81515] C pre-processor allows invalid words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81515 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- The #if group is not processed because it's control condition evaluates to zero, so the non-directive #ele is ignored. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_412.htm

[Bug libstdc++/81517] Unhelpful what() for uninitialized threads backend (in __gthread_once)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81517 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/55394] Using call_once without -lpthread compiles without warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55394 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chris.j.leonard at gmx dot com --- Com

[Bug bootstrap/57076] @ in the src directory name causes failure while building of gcc.info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57076 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/81515] C pre-processor allows invalid words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81515 --- Comment #5 from David Barto --- This is about the #ele which I would expect to either generate a parse error or a warning of some kind.

[Bug boehm-gc/14767] gcjlib under FreeBSD does not forward SIGSEGV to SA_SIGINFO handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14767 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug boehm-gc/31999] "Make -i check" finds one, and fails to find another, boehm-gc problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31999 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/81518] missing warning on a violation of attribute const requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81518 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/18487] Warnings for pure and const functions that are not actually pure or const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18487 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 81518 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/81518] missing warning on a violation of attribute const requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81518 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/81520] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa-visibility.c:639

th-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/gnu/bin/as --enable-shared --with-local-prefix=/opt/gnu --prefix=/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-8 --with-gmp=/opt/gnu/gcc/gmp --enable-threads=posix --disable-nls --disable-lto --without-cloog --without-ppl --enable-checking=yes --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,ada,obj-c++ Thread mode

[Bug boehm-gc/32498] declaration of '__end' as array of voids, declaration of '__dso_handle' as array of voids

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32498 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug boehm-gc/48494] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48494 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81516] Wrong code with -m32 -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81516 --- Comment #7 from Davin McCall --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > > Works OK for me with: > > .ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.1.1 20170718 [gcc-7-branch revision 250314]" Reported against 7.1.0. It may well be fixed already on the

[Bug boehm-gc/42304] found a resource leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42304 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug boehm-gc/74750] Address sanitizer detects stack-buffer-underflow in GC_push_all_eager in mark.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74750 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug boehm-gc/72713] boehm-gc/pthread_support.c:687: suspicious expression ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72713 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug boehm-gc/50877] link.h not found when I add --enable-objc-gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50877 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug boehm-gc/64042] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64042 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug boehm-gc/66886] trunk/boehm-gc/darwin_stop_world.c: 2 * redundant code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66886 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/81318] [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at profile-count.h:189

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318 --- Comment #12 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 41813 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41813&action=edit Too simple patch for last issue (In reply to David Binderman from comment #10) > I have this code: > ... > deriv