https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81365
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 17 09:10:23 2017
New Revision: 250261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250261&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/81365
* tree-ssa-phiprop.c (propagate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
A GIMPLE level optimization to *a = '\0'; would still be ok but I agree with
Andrew.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
There are a few issues here.
1) I cannot reproduce it: a trunk x86_64-linux compiler stores to
memory in that insn 20 (the testcase from comment 3).
2) 17, 18 -> 19 should already match. Instead we ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81459
--- Comment #4 from hothing ---
Problem is solved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81316
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Have you tried compiling the package with -mlra?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
> Have you tried compiling the package with -mlra?
Not yet, I will give it a try now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2)
>
> Not yet, I will give it a try now.
Please try. It might allow you to at least build the package. Regardless of
that, let's keep this PR open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81428
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 17 10:20:41 2017
New Revision: 250265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250265&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/81428
* match.pd (X / X -> one): Don'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81360
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|[8.0 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81366
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81368
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81374
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81382
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28859
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81387
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
There's a dup of this specific issue (workaround: -fno-ree), can't find it
right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81387
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Maybe we should just disable the REE pass if we can predict from number of
basic blocks, their sizes or number of edges that DF_UD_CHAIN + DF_DU_CHAIN
computation will be really expensive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81406
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81408
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81442
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81418
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81030
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81441
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #3)
> Please try. It might allow you to at least build the package. Regardless
> of that, let's keep this PR open.
It helps, indeed. The build now passes the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81450
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81374
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Mon Jul 17 11:34:30 2017
New Revision: 250268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/81374
* tree-loop-distribut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81457
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Please post the patch to gcc-patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81460
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81463
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81369
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Mon Jul 17 11:38:15 2017
New Revision: 250269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81369
* tree-loop-distribution.c (merg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81458
--- Comment #2 from Joerg Sonnenberger ---
More testing seems to point to binutils 2.28 as fixing objcopy. It is still not
clear whether there is any reason to preferring it though, especially as many
systems ship older versions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81369
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Mon Jul 17 11:40:54 2017
New Revision: 250270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250270&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81369
* tree-loop-distribution.c (clas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81302
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jul 17 11:44:54 2017
New Revision: 250271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not allow -fgnu-tm w/ -fsanitize={kernel-,}address (PR sanitizer/81302)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81162
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81347
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|RESOL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81347
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I would guess that the instantiation of A::tree injects the type map into the
enclosing namespace, and then the using-declaration finds two declarations and
thinks it's an error.
bug.cc:17:10: error: ‘map’
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #4)
>
> It helps, indeed. The build now passes the problematic source code file.
> However, it now bails out later with:
>
> /tmp/cck5XKuE.s: Assembler messag
101 - 156 of 156 matches
Mail list logo