https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #3 from Randy MacLeod ---
Created attachment 41681
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41681&action=edit
full preprocessor output when building jdcolor-altivec.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-oe-linux
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Pierre Chapuis from comment #5)
That's a different bug, the same one as the root cause behind the false
positive in bug 78969, comment 4. The range information available outside the
VRP pass via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81290
--- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha ---
Sorry, my bad. I've messed up my build environment for that target. Indeed
r249924 fixes the ICE everywhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #5 from Randy MacLeod ---
I agree that the creduce output should be ignored. :(
I ran 'delta' again with a manually cleaned up input and I got a minimal
reproducer that is shorter:
wc -l output:
old:
4756 /tmp/jdcolor-altivec.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #6 from Randy MacLeod ---
Created attachment 41682
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41682&action=edit
smaller reproducer with manual work-around
The work-around clearly isn't a viable one.
I believe that builtin_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r249961 PASS for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
Bug ID: 81318
Summary: [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at
profile-count.h:189
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
301 - 309 of 309 matches
Mail list logo