[Bug c/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #3 from Randy MacLeod --- Created attachment 41681 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41681&action=edit full preprocessor output when building jdcolor-altivec.c

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-oe-linux Component|c

[Bug middle-end/79257] spurious -Wformat-overflow=1 warning with -O2 and sanitizer

2017-07-04 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Pierre Chapuis from comment #5) That's a different bug, the same one as the root cause behind the false positive in bug 78969, comment 4. The range information available outside the VRP pass via

[Bug rtl-optimization/81290] [8 Regression] ICE in update_br_prob_note

2017-07-04 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81290 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- Sorry, my bad. I've messed up my build environment for that target. Indeed r249924 fixes the ICE everywhere.

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #5 from Randy MacLeod --- I agree that the creduce output should be ignored. :( I ran 'delta' again with a manually cleaned up input and I got a minimal reproducer that is shorter: wc -l output: old: 4756 /tmp/jdcolor-altivec.i

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #6 from Randy MacLeod --- Created attachment 41682 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41682&action=edit smaller reproducer with manual work-around The work-around clearly isn't a viable one. I believe that builtin_

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

2017-07-04 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r249961 PASS for me

[Bug middle-end/80328] With -ffloat-store std::array operator[] no longer cost-free

2017-07-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80328 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFI

[Bug middle-end/81318] New: [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at profile-count.h:189

2017-07-04 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318 Bug ID: 81318 Summary: [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at profile-count.h:189 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

<    1   2   3   4