https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81231
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jul 4 12:17:22 2017
New Revision: 249963
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249963&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81231
* c-common.c (sync_resolve_size): Give error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81310
Bug ID: 81310
Summary: Is __attribute__ alias on variables valid?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81231
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81309
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81309
>
> Bug ID: 81309
>Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81310
--- Comment #1 from Pedro Alves ---
Err, I meant "(&global1 == &global2) => false", of course.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 41674
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41674&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.12 pr60510.f.159t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 41675
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41675&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.12 bb-slp-1.c.163t.slp1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81310
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
It's valid on variables (but hidden aliases to variables in shared
libraries don't work properly, and the static linker has special handling
for the case where a shared library exports both
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Revision r249930 breaks some objc tests:
% /opt/gcc/gcc8p-249834p3/bin/g++
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/forward-1.m
-L/opt/gcc/build_w/x86_64-apple-darwin16.6.0/libobjc/.libs -lobjc -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 41676
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41676&action=edit
Assembly with the patch for r249930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 41677
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41677&action=edit
assembly with the fixes before r249930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
I've had a go at chopping down the command line and got this:
$ pwd
/home/dcb/gcc/working/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc
$ /home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/ -Wall -I.
-I../../../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81304
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bogus warning with |[5/6/7/8 Regression] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81311
Bug ID: 81311
Summary: An std::ref argument calls copy constructor instead of
template constructor in C++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Further:
$ GNAT_FILE_NAME_CASE_SENSITIVE=1 gnatmake -c p*.ads
gcc -c páck3.ads
páck3.ads:1:10: warning: file name does not match unit name, should be
"páck3.ads"
The reason for this apparently-bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81308
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The ICE is because split2 apparently ends up with various unreachable basic
blocks and the checking code attempts to compute dominance info before those
are actually cleaned up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #17 from simon at pushface dot org ---
I applied your patches (comment 12, comment 13) to the gcc-8-20170702 snapshot.
Building on darwin 16.6.0 with gcc-7.1.0 as the stage1 compiler was successful
(languages=c,c++,ada).
make check-c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67321
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
Bug ID: 81312
Summary: Enable X86_TUNE_ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
ret
.size bar, .-bar
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.1.1 20170704"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ /tmp/b.c -S -O2
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mincoming-stack-boundary=3
-maccumulate-outgoing-args
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am planning to look into Zen/generic tunning soon. But why would you like to
enable it for generic? The code size cost is quite large.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80451
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81259
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> I am planning to look into Zen/generic tunning soon. But why would you like
> to
> enable it for generic? The code size cost is quite large.
>
> Honza
Doesn't it improv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71556
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
failure mode? an empty main program is segfaulting.
looks like --enable-default-pie and --enable-secureplt are only used for my
build.
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81314
Bug ID: 81314
Summary: In function `star1(int, std::vector >&) [clone ._omp_cpyfn.1]':
$(PWD)/stencil-vector-taskloop-gccbug2.cc:4: undefined
reference to `std::vector >::vector(std::v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Doesn't it improve performance in 64-bit mode?
It used to be important for CPUs without ESP prediction engines, but most of
those are
history now. The codegen is quite different so it may be the case that i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> > Doesn't it improve performance in 64-bit mode?
>
> It used to be important for CPUs without ESP prediction engines, but most of
> those are
> history now. The codegen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66403
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65452
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65430
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|6.0 |
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
To answer your last question (from comment 1) first: at expand
time we have:
d.3_10 = d;
_11 = (long long unsigned int) d.3_10;
c.4_12 = c;
e.5_14 = e;
_15 = (long long unsigned int) e.5_14;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66250
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65891
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
#3 from David Binderman ---
Did this one get into trunk ?
I am still seeing this at date 20170704.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 4 18:51:02 2017
New Revision: 249975
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249975&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/81278
* tree-vrp.c (compare_assert_loc): Turn in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257
Pierre Chapuis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||catwell-gcc at catwell dot info
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257
--- Comment #6 from Pierre Chapuis ---
(Note this is my first time reporting something to GCC, if you think I should
have opened a new ticked because it may be a slightly different bug please tell
me.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
Bug ID: 81315
Summary: powerpc64 vs building lang/gcc7-devel (on FreeBSD
head): xgcc gets segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81316
Bug ID: 81316
Summary: Missing memory side effect on __atomic_store
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Just for interest, this not-very-good code will successfully convert
the uppercase-a-acute input c381 to uppercase-a/combining-acute 41cc81:
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(void)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69513
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65846
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35514
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66398
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69940
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70598
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61551
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81294
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 4 20:46:38 2017
New Revision: 249976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81294
* config/i386/adxintrin.h (_subbor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81300
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 4 20:52:32 2017
New Revision: 249977
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249977&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-04 Uros Bizjak
PR target/81300
* confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67352
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81294
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 4 21:05:17 2017
New Revision: 249978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81300
* config/i386/i386.md (setcc + mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81300
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 4 21:05:17 2017
New Revision: 249978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81300
* config/i386/i386.md (setcc + mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71419
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Pierre Chapuis from comment #5)
> I think I can reproduce something similar *without* the sanitizer.
>
> Using GCC 7.1.1, with:
>
> #include
> int main () {
> int i; char obuf[3];
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
Bug ID: 81317
Summary: builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #1 from Randy MacLeod ---
I also used the delta utility to produce a larger reproducer. I'll attach it as
jdcolor-altivec-testcase-min.i along with the full preprocessor output in case
it's useful to have additional context.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #2 from Randy MacLeod ---
Created attachment 41680
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41680&action=edit
minimal testcase produced by the delta utility
201 - 300 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
