[Bug sanitizer/81023] False positiv stack-use-after-scope (worked with GCC 6, fails with GCC 7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81023 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 --- Comment #1 from Doug Gilmore --- Created attachment 41510 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41510&action=edit Patch to constrain the number of multi-lib variants

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 --- Comment #2 from Doug Gilmore --- Created attachment 41511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41511&action=edit patch needed to build r248863 for MIPS

[Bug middle-end/81005] -fsanitize=null and -fsanitize=alignment doesn't check aggregate arguments of calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81005 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 18:53:16 2017 New Revision: 249030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249030&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/81005 * ubsan.c (instrument_null): Avoid poi

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] New: [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 Bug ID: 81025 Summary: [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 18:55:04 2017 New Revision: 249031 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249031&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81011 * cp-gimplify.c (cxx_omp_finish_clause): When

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:02:09 2017 New Revision: 249032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249032&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81011 * cp-gimplify.c (cxx_omp_finish_clause): When

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:04:40 2017 New Revision: 249034 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249034&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81011 * cp-gimplify.c (cxx_omp_finish_clause): When

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:10:49 2017 New Revision: 249035 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249035&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/81006 * c-typeck.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Con

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:12:38 2017 New Revision: 249036 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249036&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/81006 * c-typeck.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Con

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:13:51 2017 New Revision: 249037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249037&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/81006 * c-typeck.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Con

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:23:34 2017 New Revision: 249038 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249038&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/81006 * c-typeck.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Con

[Bug rtl-optimization/80693] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80693 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0) > Also, the costs dump in the first replacement looks wrong: > original costs 0 + 4 + 4 = 0 This is correct: 0 means undefined. You usually get it from a para

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 --- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 8 19:42:59 2017 New Revision: 249039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249039&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81015 Revert: 2016-12-14 Uros

[Bug target/81015] Bad codegen for __builtin_clz(unsigned short)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81015 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 8 19:42:59 2017 New Revision: 249039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249039&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81015 Revert: 2016-12-14 Uros B

[Bug target/81015] Bad codegen for __builtin_clz(unsigned short)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81015 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/26493] -freorder-blocks-and-partition is a dud without generated profiling data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 --- Comment #3 from Doug Gilmore --- It appears that r248863 just tickles the bug. With the attached example produced by delta the failure mode is exposed by r248862.With luck, I may be able to bisect the problem to an earlier commit.

[Bug c++/81026] New: Lookup of dependent member template incorrectly finds non-member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81026 Bug ID: 81026 Summary: Lookup of dependent member template incorrectly finds non-member Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/81000] std::any improvement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81000 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) > (Of course, a different implementation of std::any might be easier to > optimize) >From a quick test, if instead of storing a pointer to _S_manage we store a pointer

[Bug fortran/81027] New: Assumed-shape array reported as deferred.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81027 Bug ID: 81027 Summary: Assumed-shape array reported as deferred. Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/81028] New: miscompiles placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 Bug ID: 81028 Summary: miscompiles placement new Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: u

[Bug c++/81028] GCC miscompiles placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 Hubert Tong changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Version|7.0

[Bug fortran/52473] CSHIFT slow - inline it?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/80966] ICE with -fstack-limit-register and large frames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Jun 9 03:46:08 2017 New Revision: 249046 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249046&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Don't add an immediate to r0 (PR80966) If there is a large

[Bug fortran/80009] Printing/writing a structure with a real edit descriptor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80009 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- After a lot of head scratching I think I am changing my mind on this one. If one tries to assign to a real variable as in: program test_b_write_dt_mod use :: B_write_dt_mod implicit none type(B_

[Bug other/81029] New: Compiling sketch with arduinodroid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81029 Bug ID: 81029 Summary: Compiling sketch with arduinodroid Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug middle-end/81030] New: ICE on valid code at -O1 (only) on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81030 Bug ID: 81030 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O1 (only) on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/80862] [x86] Wrong rounding results for some test cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80862 --- Comment #3 from Yulia Koval --- Fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=249009

[Bug tree-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/81032] New: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with lambda and broken constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81032 Bug ID: 81032 Summary: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with lambda and broken constexpr Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery, ice

[Bug target/80966] ICE with -fstack-limit-register and large frames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 --- Comment #29 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28) > As I've said before, the parallelization of ms-sysv.exp runs may be a > bonus, but is certainly separate from this PR and thus should be split >

<    1   2