https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80797
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu May 18 07:18:24 2017
New Revision: 248179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80797
* ubsan.c (instrument_null): Unwrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80797
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80797
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #4)
> I applied your patch to version 8 trunk 247930 and it seems to work,
> but on your example I get
>
> ubsan-1.c:10:8: runtime error: member access within null p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80808
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80807
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80810
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80777
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80764
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80777
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
Why shouldn't gcc configured for cygwin use the windows ABI?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80799
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> This is caused by r243527.
Thanks. FYI, the above revision just triggers the issue.
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80799
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
Assignee|paolo.carli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 09:23:43 2017
New Revision: 248183
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248183&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR59170 make pretty printers check for singular iterators
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59161
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 09:23:38 2017
New Revision: 248182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248182&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR59161 make pretty printers always return strings
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80777
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It uses the ms-abi for calling conventions but LP64, no LLP64:
https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/programming.html
That's by design, and so GCC's behaviour is not a bug. If GDB is inconsistent
that's not a G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59161
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
Bug ID: 80814
Summary: commit aa443150c83535fedccb3dee80daa7e01fafd92d causes
a build error.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80777
--- Comment #9 from Julian Rose ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> It uses the ms-abi for calling conventions but LP64, no LLP64:
> https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/programming.html
>
> That's by design, and so GCC's behaviour i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80593
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Breaks at least g++.dg/warn/Wstrict-aliasing-6.C which I think is expected
fallout.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79651
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79968
--- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese ---
Author: foreese
Date: Thu May 18 10:24:37 2017
New Revision: 248188
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248188&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-18 Fritz Reese
PR fortran/79968
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79968
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80777
--- Comment #10 from Julian Rose ---
(In reply to Julian Rose from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> > It uses the ms-abi for calling conventions but LP64, no LLP64:
> > https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/programming.htm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80777
Pedro Alves changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palves at redhat dot com
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80809
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80809
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80780
--- Comment #4 from lbjonnes at cisco dot com ---
"redi at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
| https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80780
>
| Bug ID: 80780
|Summary: Front-end support needed for
| exper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80815
Bug ID: 80815
Summary: wrong code because of broken runtime alias check in
vectorizer
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80815
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Are you doing a from-scratch build or an incremental build? Try removing the
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo directory to force it to be rebuilt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
--- Comment #2 from Hussam Al-Tayeb ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #1)
> Are you doing a from-scratch build or an incremental build? Try removing
> the x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo directory to force it to be rebuilt.
I was doing a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:34:50 2017
New Revision: 248207
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248207&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/78236 fix past-the-end std::regex_iterator
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:34:56 2017
New Revision: 248208
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248208&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 71444 define more error constants for mingw-w64
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:35:18 2017
New Revision: 248211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67440 make pretty printers work with GDB 7.6 again
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:35:12 2017
New Revision: 248210
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248210&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR69699 document why __GLIBCXX__ macro is useless
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:35:23 2017
New Revision: 248212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80137 use std::nextafter instead of looping
Backport from m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80448
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:35:40 2017
New Revision: 248215
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248215&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80448 remove noexcept from defaulted functions
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80504
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:35:54 2017
New Revision: 248217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80504 qualify calls to avoid ADL
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80493
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:35:45 2017
New Revision: 248216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80493 fix invalid exception specification
Backport from mai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> Author: redi
> Date: Thu May 18 14:35:23 2017
> New Revision: 248212
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248212&root=gcc&view=rev
Doh, I managed to ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I can't recreate the problem. It looks like the compilation step in the
failing command is reading old versions of the .gox files, versions that use
the old pkgpath rather than the new one introduced by t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
--- Comment #4 from Hussam Al-Tayeb ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #3)
> I can't recreate the problem. It looks like the compilation step in the
> failing command is reading old versions of the .gox files, versions that use
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80811
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80493
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80816
Bug ID: 80816
Summary: thread_local destructor on windows cause
use-after-free
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla@poradnik-webmaster
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80807
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80817
Bug ID: 80817
Summary: [missed optimization][x86] relaxed atomics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80504
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 15:30:57 2017
New Revision: 248231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248231&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 71444 define more error constants for mingw-w64
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 15:30:42 2017
New Revision: 248230
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248230&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/78236 fix past-the-end std::regex_iterator
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 15:31:02 2017
New Revision: 248232
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248232&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR69699 document why __GLIBCXX__ macro is useless
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 15:31:07 2017
New Revision: 248233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67440 make pretty printers work with GDB 7.6 again
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80448
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 15:31:22 2017
New Revision: 248236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80448 remove noexcept from defaulted functions
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80504
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 15:31:36 2017
New Revision: 248237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248237&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80504 qualify calls to avoid ADL
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80818
Bug ID: 80818
Summary: LRA clobbers live hard reg clobbered during
rematerialization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80818
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-04-01 00:00:00 |2017-5-18
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80448
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed in 5.5, 6.4 and 7.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80783
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80819
Bug ID: 80819
Summary: [5/6/7/8 regression] Useless store to the stack in
_mm_set_epi64x with SSE4 -mno-avx
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80819
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>-mtune=generic still stores/reloads instead of using movd for %edi and %edx,
>which is worse for most CPUs.
Worse on most Intel but not most AMD CPUs. You can use -mtune=intel if you
want to tune for Inte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80478
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 17:32:06 2017
New Revision: 248245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80478 make std::mem_fn work with noexcept functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80817
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80799
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu May 18 18:03:30 2017
New Revision: 248246
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248246&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/80799
* config/i386/mmx.md (*mov_interna
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80478
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 18:04:15 2017
New Revision: 248247
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248247&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80478 make std::mem_fn work with noexcept functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80478
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80795
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80510
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu May 18 19:34:13 2017
New Revision: 248254
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248254&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-05-18 Michael Meissner
PR target/80510
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80811
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
When user specializations are allowed, who knows what might happen.
As an experiment,
namespace std { extern template __attribute__((pure)) int
string::compare(const char*)const; }
seems to work. I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80817
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> void f(volatile int *p)
> {
> ++*p;
> }
That's PR 50677 for instance. Some targets do handle it, there have been
discussions in the past, this seems to requ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80820
Bug ID: 80820
Summary: _mm_set_epi64x shouldn't store/reload for
-mtune=haswell, Zen should avoid store/reload, and
generic should think about it.
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80819
--- Comment #2 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >-mtune=generic still stores/reloads instead of using movd for %edi and %edx,
> >which is worse for most CPUs.
> Worse on most Intel but not most AMD CPUs. You
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80783
--- Comment #2 from Victor Nawothnig ---
Except all the following examples violate the core constant expression
constraint ([expr.const] 2.3), but GCC diagnoses only some:
```
$ echo '#include \n constexpr int f() { atoi(""); return 1; }' |
g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80783
--- Comment #3 from Victor Nawothnig ---
Created attachment 41384
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41384&action=edit
Examples
All testcases and their results attached for better readability
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80783
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Santos ---
OK, I think I've got these fixed but I need to rerun my tests now. Somebody
else discovered another flaw that caused the test to break with -j1 (when
parallelization wasn't being used). I hate that I've had
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
--- Comment #5 from Hussam Al-Tayeb ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #3)
> Have you run `make install` to install an earlier version of the build?
> Perhaps the compilation command is incorrectly looking at the installed .gox
> fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80821
Bug ID: 80821
Summary: genmatch conflicting predicates
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80811
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
That does work. I had tried with the attribute on the end of the declaration
and it barfed.
I was going to say I'd worry that declaring the members extern template might
effectively hide them from their bodi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80811
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
That should have read:
> ...hide their bodies from the optimizer...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
--- Comment #6 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu May 18 22:44:12 2017
New Revision: 248255
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248255&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/80814
* Makefile.am (AM_GOCFLAGS): Define.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80814
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80822
Bug ID: 80822
Summary: libgomp incorrect affinity when OMP_PLACES=threads
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59048
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66499
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The trimmed length is incorrect.
With this test:
program test_character
real:: a
character(len=2, kind=4):: char1, char2
char2 = 4_"Ã"
open(6, encoding="utf-8")
write(*,'(a)') trim(char2)
!pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Santos ---
Created attachment 41386
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41386&action=edit
proposed fix
Rainer,
Would you be so kind as to test this on Solaris for me please? I don't have
access to a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Santos ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3)
> > Well, this was my introduction to DejaGnu and the test harness. I found
> > that
> > none of these support doing a build when there is more th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80796
Bug ID: 80796
Summary: std::make_xxx_searcher / std::search(iter, iter,
searcher) is missing
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80823
Bug ID: 80823
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80823
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
99 matches
Mail list logo
