https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80769
Bug ID: 80769
Summary: Invalid delayed string length computation in
tree-ssa-strlen.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80737
--- Comment #6 from Tim Shen ---
(In reply to TC from comment #5)
> (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #3)
> > (In reply to TC from comment #1)
> > > Looks like the constraint on the convert-everything constructor needs to
> > > check for is_same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80425
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon May 15 19:04:35 2017
New Revision: 248070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* config/i386.i386.md (*zero_extendsidi2): Do not penalize
no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80425
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Mostly fixed, an issue from Comment #4 remains, although *zero_extendsidi2
pattern now reads:
(define_insn "*zero_extendsidi2"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
"=r,?r,?o,r ,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80752
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80752
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon May 15 19:34:52 2017
New Revision: 248072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-15 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/80752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79369
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 15 19:35:52 2017
New Revision: 248073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/cp/
PR c++/79369
* cp-tree.h (DECL_NAMESPACE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63261
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Petazzoni ---
This bug still exists in gcc 5.4.0 on Microblaze.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79369
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80765
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon May 15 20:06:06 2017
New Revision: 248074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-15 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/80765
* m4/matmu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80765
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80769
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79369
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 15 20:26:19 2017
New Revision: 248075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248075&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79369
* g++.dg/cpp1z/nested-namespace-def1.C: Adj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
I just committed r248074 which I suspect is the same problem
(the fix for PR 80765).
If you could just upgrade to the most recent trunk (only
need to upgrade libgfortran, really) an check if the fix
also wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80767
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80752
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon May 15 20:43:25 2017
New Revision: 248076
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248076&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-15 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/80752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Santos ---
Actually, I just realized that it won't help to move do_test.S into ms-sysv.c
as inline asm because each test still needs a unique ms-sysv-generated.h header
that's generated by the output of gen.cc. Althoug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80752
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon May 15 23:02:42 2017
New Revision: 248078
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248078&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-15 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/80752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80752
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80770
Bug ID: 80770
Summary: suboptimal code negating a 1-bit _Bool field
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80674
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon May 15 23:46:23 2017
New Revision: 248079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-15 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/80674
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80727
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 15 23:48:39 2017
New Revision: 248080
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248080&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-15 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/80727
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80674
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881
--- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #15)
> The new testcase FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/SPARC:
>
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03 -O0 execution test
See if fixed on trunk now after commit to fix 80767.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80741
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
My initial looks are seeing a DTIO related frontend issue but this is not
causing the regression as far as I can tell.
I have looked at several other intervening patches and don't see anything
obvious, so I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80771
Bug ID: 80771
Summary: GCC ignores default template argument declaration in
the template definition
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80772
Bug ID: 80772
Summary: GCC ignores default template argument declaration in
the template definition
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68372
--- Comment #3 from wilhelm.me...@hs-kl.de ---
This ICE still exists in:
g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20170515 (experimental)
Here is another minimal example:
template
concept bool FCallable() {
return requires(F) {
F::f();
};
}
class Test1
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
