https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80677
--- Comment #2 from Helmut Grohne ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> Well, if headers move then configure (and related) tests that look at them
> will need updating. See how gcc/configure.ac looks in $target_header_dir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80685
Bug ID: 80685
Summary: -Wnonnull-compare warns based on builtin declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80685
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80685
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Use -fno-builtins if you don't want gcc to assumes things about functions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80678
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It doesn't fail on x86_64/i686 where I've tested it.
Seems this is because r237426 has not been backported (and neither earlier
r237319). Richard, do we want to backport those? Aren't those wrong-code
fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80678
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Also, note the testcase has been ICEing even with older 6.x branch snapshots,
it is just that the testcase has been newly added.
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo