[Bug bootstrap/80677] LIMITS_H_TEST is wrong

2017-05-08 Thread helmut at subdivi dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80677 --- Comment #2 from Helmut Grohne --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1) > Well, if headers move then configure (and related) tests that look at them > will need updating. See how gcc/configure.ac looks in $target_header_dir

[Bug c/80685] New: -Wnonnull-compare warns based on builtin declaration

2017-05-08 Thread coypu at sdf dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80685 Bug ID: 80685 Summary: -Wnonnull-compare warns based on builtin declaration Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/80685] -Wnonnull-compare warns based on builtin declaration

2017-05-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80685 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80685] -Wnonnull-compare warns based on builtin declaration

2017-05-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80685 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Use -fno-builtins if you don't want gcc to assumes things about functions.

[Bug other/80678] g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-79681-2.C fails with ICE starting with r247678

2017-05-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80678 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- It doesn't fail on x86_64/i686 where I've tested it. Seems this is because r237426 has not been backported (and neither earlier r237319). Richard, do we want to backport those? Aren't those wrong-code fixes

[Bug other/80678] g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-79681-2.C fails with ICE starting with r247678

2017-05-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80678 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Also, note the testcase has been ICEing even with older 6.x branch snapshots, it is just that the testcase has been newly added.

<    1   2