https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80557
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat May 6 07:16:17 2017
New Revision: 247712
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247712&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Replace absolute line numbers in g++.dg/{debug,goacc}
2017-05-06 Tom de V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80557
--- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat May 6 07:16:53 2017
New Revision: 247715
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247715&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Replace absolute line numbers in gcc.target/spu
2017-05-06 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80557
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat May 6 07:16:43 2017
New Revision: 247714
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Replace absolute line numbers in gcc.target/arm
2017-05-06 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80557
--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat May 6 07:16:33 2017
New Revision: 247713
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247713&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Replace absolute line numbers in gcc.target/aarch64
2017-05-06 Tom de Vri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80557
--- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat May 6 07:17:05 2017
New Revision: 247716
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247716&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Replace absolute line numbers in gcc.target/powerpc
2017-05-06 Tom de Vr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80649
Bug ID: 80649
Summary: value-initialization rather than
default-initialization at some optimization levels
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80606
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat May 6 07:31:27 2017
New Revision: 247718
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove default_packed lines from i386/avx-vtestp{d,s}*
2017-05-06 Tom de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80606
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat May 6 07:44:13 2017
New Revision: 247719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247719&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 75964: Invalid integer ABS handling in simplify-rtx.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80527
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #19)
> And IIRC we even use the finalization
> wrapper for deallocating polymorphic variables in other cases (even if they
> have no actual FINAL procedures).
In fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80649
--- Comment #1 from J.D. Duncan ---
Created attachment 41330
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41330&action=edit
g++ -v output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80652
Bug ID: 80652
Summary: Union conversion between __m128d and double array does
not work under 5.0 through 6.2
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80653
Bug ID: 80653
Summary: Enhancement: better location info for
-Wunsafe-loop-optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79709
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 41331
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41331&action=edit
recognize a VEC_CONCAT from a constructor (not clean)
One piece of the issue is v4di = { v2di, v2di } where we cu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat May 6 15:03:40 2017
New Revision: 247721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78496
* tree-vrp.c (simplify_assert_ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80652
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
I didn't study the testcase (a bit long), but I am getting the same output with
any version of gcc or clang I tried, at any level of optimization. Are you
certain about your example? What is the expected output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80652
--- Comment #2 from Peter Boyle ---
Thanks for the quick response. Hope this more complete info is helpful.
Should give (1,0) but does give (0,0) under G++ 5.0-6.2 under -O3.
peterboyle$ g++-mp-5 --version
g++-mp-5 (MacPorts gcc5 5.4.0_0) 5.4.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80652
--- Comment #3 from Peter Boyle ---
Can confirm (5.4) that -O2 also fails,
-O1 passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70878
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71158
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 71158, which changed state.
Bug 71158 Summary: ICE in tree_to_uhwi with -fsanitize=address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71158
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50184
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Fixed in 7.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80654
Bug ID: 80654
Summary: is_trivially_copy_constructible fails with compiler
error with vector of uncopyable objects
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80655
Bug ID: 80655
Summary: -Werror=format-truncation inconsistency between x86_32
and x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80655
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80655
--- Comment #2 from Armin K. ---
Created attachment 41333
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41333&action=edit
Preprocessed source files
Here are the requested files. I apologize for having to compress them, but a
single file e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat May 6 18:20:31 2017
New Revision: 247722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247722&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78496
* tree-vrp.c (simplify_assert_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80654
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80656
Bug ID: 80656
Summary: mips64-linux cross build fails: Link tests are not
allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80656
--- Comment #1 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de ---
Turns out my libc was installed incorrectly.
Retrying now. I'm still getting this build error in libgomp and libstdc++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80648
Keith Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80649
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80648
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657
Bug ID: 80657
Summary: Loop in character function declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67486
--- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still in 7.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77383
--- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still in 7.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62058
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still there in 7.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67498
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 61908, which changed state.
Bug 61908 Summary: load of invalid value for 'expr_t' in interface.c
compare_actual_formal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61908
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61908
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67213
--- Comment #5 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
Still same in GCC-7.1.0.
I analyzed using -fdump-tree-cunroll-details
void test_iter_6(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
data[i] = i;
}
}
The function was generated "test_iter_6":
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67213
--- Comment #6 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
Same thing for x86, not only ARM:
bash# gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
bash# gcc -c test.c -Os --param max-completely-peel-times=5
bash# objdump -dath test.o
Di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80648
--- Comment #4 from Keith Thompson ---
Then what does
> Issues with DR, accepted, DRWP, and WP status are NOT part of the
> International Standard for C++.
mean? The web page itself says that issues with DR status are not
part of C++11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80658
Bug ID: 80658
Summary: Memory leak reported in libstdc++ (zerotier)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80659
Bug ID: 80659
Summary: [7 regression] -fsanitize=address evokes ICE in in
gimplify_switch_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80655
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also what options is being used to invoke GCC?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80655
--- Comment #4 from Armin K. ---
There is a log file in the tarball with all the options. Package is built with
cmake, so there's lot of them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80655
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
53 matches
Mail list logo
