[Bug middle-end/41953] missing uninitialized warning (SRA,VOP)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41953 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Sth like the following. Note that fentry_reached just means that there exists a path from function entry to the use that has the use not initialized -- it doesn't mean this path can be ever executed (there'

[Bug ada/80590] New: [ada] non-bootstrap build failure in ada -- Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590 Bug ID: 80590 Summary: [ada] non-bootstrap build failure in ada -- Error reporting routines re-entered Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug ada/80590] [ada] non-bootstrap build failure in ada -- Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41294 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41294&action=edit g-exptty.adb

[Bug ada/80590] [ada] non-bootstrap build failure in ada -- Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41295 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41295&action=edit g-exptty.ads

[Bug tree-optimization/80558] VRP not handling x & -2 well

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80558 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug ada/80590] [ada] non-bootstrap build failure in ada -- Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- $ nobootstrap/build/./gcc/xgcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=nobootstrap/build/./gcc/xgcc Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: src/configure --prefix=nobootstrap/install --with-gmp=infra --with-

[Bug ada/80590] [ada] non-bootstrap build failure in ada -- Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- r247436

[Bug c++/80561] Missed optimization: std::array data is aligned if array is aligned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80561 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug bootstrap/80565] [8 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 in 32-bit mode (not 64-bit) on x86_64-linux-gnu (in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1028)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80565 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/80568] x86 -mavx256-split-unaligned-load (and store) is affecting AVX2 code, but probably shouldn't be.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80568 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- It was a bugfix and it's now working as intended AFAIK. You can search for duplicate bugreports.

[Bug target/80570] auto-vectorizing int->double conversion should use half-width memory operands to avoid shuffles, instead of load+extract

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80570 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80574] GCC fail to optimize nested ternary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80574 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80577] Avoid using adj in member function pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80577 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug testsuite/80580] GIMPLEFE ICE on invalid code (fuzz testing)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80580 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Thanks. Fuzzing / fixing issues in the parser itself is ok. Catching late reported errors due to invalid GIMPLE in the input as we do now is expected (the GIMPLE verifier will usually report an error and t

[Bug ada/80590] [ada] non-bootstrap build failure in ada -- Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41296 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41296&action=edit ads.tgz

[Bug ada/80590] [ada] non-bootstrap build failure in ada -- Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- The workaround is probably to use the same compiler as base compiler.

[Bug tree-optimization/80591] New: [7/8 Regression] AArch64 kernel miscompilation starting with r246809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80591 Bug ID: 80591 Summary: [7/8 Regression] AArch64 kernel miscompilation starting with r246809 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/80583] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with target_clones and vectorized float: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80583 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug tree-optimization/80591] [7/8 Regression] AArch64 kernel miscompilation starting with r246809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80591 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80591] [7/8 Regression] AArch64 kernel miscompilation starting with r246809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80591 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/80578] -fsanitize=undefined report yields memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80578 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/80591] [7/8 Regression] AArch64 kernel miscompilation starting with r246809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80591 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/78678] possibly missing -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/78678] possibly missing -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 41297 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41297&action=edit reduced test-case

[Bug other/80589] Typing mistakes in two messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80589 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/78678] possibly missing -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 2 May 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug other/80589] Typing mistakes in two messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80589 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue May 2 09:38:55 2017 New Revision: 247485 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247485&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix 2 typos in documentation (PR other/80589). 2017-05-02 Martin Liska

[Bug other/80589] Typing mistakes in two messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80589 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug ipa/80581] [8 Regression] ICE: in estimate_node_size_and_time, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:3425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80581 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/80583] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with target_clones and vectorized float: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80583 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug other/78678] possibly missing -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- I see, but what about comparing the access to TYPE_SIZE of a variable: diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c index 5ebdcdfd796..d493b27f536 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c

[Bug sanitizer/80578] -fsanitize=undefined report yields memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80578 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Confirmed, it's caused by fact that the vptr ubsan error calls demangler to > display type name. That's the place where the memory is allocated and not > properly

[Bug other/78678] possibly missing -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 2 May 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 > > --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > I see, but what about comparing the access to

[Bug other/78678] possibly missing -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c/80592] New: gcc fails to detect overflow in shift statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80592 Bug ID: 80592 Summary: gcc fails to detect overflow in shift statement Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug other/78678] possibly missing -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 2 May 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78678 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug c++/80593] New: GCC 7, aligned_storage and “dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80593 Bug ID: 80593 Summary: GCC 7, aligned_storage and “dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules” Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/77954] LTO_STREAMER_DEBUG ICE with OpenMP SIMD clones

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77954 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c++/80593] [7/8 Regression] GCC 7, aligned_storage and “dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80593 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/80592] gcc fails to detect overflow in shift statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80592 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80549] [7/8 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (executable does not terminate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80549 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 2 11:24:52 2017 New Revision: 247486 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247486&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-05-02 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/80549

[Bug target/79964] Cortex A53 codegen still not optimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79964 --- Comment #3 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to PeteVine from comment #2) > I can confirm the first part of the issue gets fixed with this patch: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg01415.html There are a few more div

[Bug tree-optimization/80591] [7/8 Regression] AArch64 kernel miscompilation starting with r246809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80591 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 2 11:26:25 2017 New Revision: 247487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247487&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-05-02 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/80591

[Bug tree-optimization/80591] [7/8 Regression] AArch64 kernel miscompilation starting with r246809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80591 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 2 11:27:15 2017 New Revision: 247488 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247488&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-05-02 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/80591

[Bug tree-optimization/80591] [7/8 Regression] AArch64 kernel miscompilation starting with r246809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80591 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80549] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (executable does not terminate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80549 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[7/8 Regression]

[Bug c++/80561] Missed optimization: std::array data is aligned if array is aligned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80561 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ok, the reason is that the actual memory reference does not expose this alignment. The vectorizer sees MEM[(const value_type &)v2_7(D)][_1] unit size align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 can

[Bug c++/80561] Missed optimization: std::array data is aligned if array is aligned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80561 --- Comment #3 from John Zwinck --- I'm aware of the workaround using __builtin_assume_aligned() - you can see I formulated an equivalent but pure C++ workaround using alignas() in the aforementioned Stack Overflow post. But 99% of users won't k

[Bug c++/80593] [7/8 Regression] GCC 7, aligned_storage and “dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80593 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/80594] New: error: ‘SDL_Window’ does not name a type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80594 Bug ID: 80594 Summary: error: ‘SDL_Window’ does not name a type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/78687] inefficient code generated for eggs.variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Tue May 2 12:49:55 2017 New Revision: 247497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247497&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR 78687] Set SRA grp_write lazily 2017-05-02 Martin Jambor

[Bug tree-optimization/78687] inefficient code generated for eggs.variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/80581] [8 Regression] ICE: in estimate_node_size_and_time, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:3425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80581 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- This is an roundoff issue. While summing the times it happens that n*1000/1000 > n. The following patch should silence it unless they cummulate for very large value (which I will likely want to investigate th

[Bug fortran/80467] Function Without Arguments Fails to Generate Error When Declared Later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80467 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Armstrong --- I agree that the code is invalid, and it is the user's responsibility. However, I don't think an internal compiler error is appropriate in this case. An actual error would be preferable.

[Bug c++/80594] error: ‘SDL_Window’ does not name a type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80594 d25fe0be@ changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d25fe0be at outlook dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug fortran/80467] Function Without Arguments Fails to Generate Error When Declared Later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80467 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I agree that the code is invalid, and it is the user's responsibility. > However, I don't think an internal compiler error is appropriate in this > case. AFAICT you get the internal error only wi

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > It looks like gnat1 was compiled with libgcc, which is not able to > handle unwinding on Darwin. > I suppose it must be linked without -static-libgcc This was handled properly on darwin up to r2472

[Bug fortran/80467] Function Without Arguments Fails to Generate Error When Declared Later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80467 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Armstrong --- > AFAICT you get the internal error only with compilers configured with > --enable-checking=yes. I was refering to a compiler crash occurring on a non-trivial program: internal compiler error: in conve

[Bug fortran/80467] Function Without Arguments Fails to Generate Error When Declared Later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80467 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Armstrong --- It's actually easy to trigger the ICE with a small change. The following causes an internal compiler error wiht GCC 6.3 under MinGW-W64: ! program noargs

[Bug fortran/80595] New: [OOP] ICE using allocate with mold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80595 Bug ID: 80595 Summary: [OOP] ICE using allocate with mold Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/80596] New: g++ generates incomplete DWARF debug information for array-typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80596 Bug ID: 80596 Summary: g++ generates incomplete DWARF debug information for array-typedefs Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/80595] [OOP] ICE using allocate with mold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80595 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/79489] Strange static branch prediction for n != 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79489 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue May 2 15:00:47 2017 New Revision: 247501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247501&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Remove LTO_STREAMER_DEBUG (PR lto/79489). 2017-05-02 Martin Liska

[Bug bootstrap/69506] [6 Regression] check-in 232454 seems to cause problems with cygwin builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69506 --- Comment #9 from jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jyong Date: Tue May 2 15:04:39 2017 New Revision: 247502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247502&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-05-02 Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen PR libstdc++/69506

[Bug tree-optimization/79489] Strange static branch prediction for n != 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79489 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Author: marxin > Date: Tue May 2 15:00:47 2017 > New Revision: 247501 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247501&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > Remove LTO_STREAM

[Bug lto/77954] LTO_STREAMER_DEBUG ICE with OpenMP SIMD clones

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77954 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue May 2 15:00:47 2017 New Revision: 247501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247501&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Remove LTO_STREAMER_DEBUG (PR lto/79489). 2017-05-02 Martin Liska

[Bug lto/77954] LTO_STREAMER_DEBUG ICE with OpenMP SIMD clones

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77954 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80559] Segmentation fault on invalid initialiser list template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80559 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/80559] Segmentation fault on invalid initialiser list template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80559 --- Comment #2 from Matt Godbolt --- Thanks: it seems the command-line parameter `-std=c++1z` is needed to trigger the segfault. https://godbolt.org/g/6oDO6X Apologies for not realising this in the initial report.

[Bug c++/80562] [7/8 Regression] ICE using if constexpr with nonconstant expression in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80562 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71450] [5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in lookup_base, at cp/sear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71450 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/79793] Incorrect stack alignment for interrupt handler in 64-bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/68256] Defining TARGET_USE_CONSTANT_BLOCKS_P causes go bootstrap failure on aarch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68256 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/70902] GCC freezes while compiling for 'skylake-avx512' target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70902 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/79488] [7/8 Regression] ICE from lambda that has invalid return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79488 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/78557] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in trans-expr.c with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78557 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/79534] [7/8 Regression] tree-ifcombine aarch64 performance regression with trunk@245151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/80559] [7/8 Regression] Segmentation fault on invalid initialiser list template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80559 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79483] [7/8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 31 does not dominate use in block 28)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/56691] [OOP] Allocatable array: wrong offset when passing to CLASS dummy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56691 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c/79855] params.def: missing period in PARAM_MAX_STORES_TO_MERGE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79855 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/71625] missing strlen optimization on different array initialization style

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug testsuite/78421] [7/8 Regression] vect-strided-a-u8-i2-gap.c fails on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78421 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/71751] [7/8 Regression] Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71751 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug libfortran/79540] [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7/8 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/78009] [OOP] polymorphic component of derived type array slice handling error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78009 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug rtl-optimization/79901] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79901 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/78633] [7/8 Regression] [SH] libgcc/fp-bit.c:944:1: error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/70982] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc etc. FAIL with --enable-vtable-verify

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70982 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/80120] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect error with associate construct and character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80120 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/80449] [7/8 Regression] ICE reporting failed partial class template specialization class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80449 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/79975] SEGV in cc1 compiling gcc.dg/rtl/x86_64/final.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79975 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/70277] Improve code generation for large initializer lists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/68543] [AArch64] Implement overflow arithmetic standard names {u,}{add,sub,mul}v4 and/or negv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug jit/66054] bootstrap comparison failure with --enable-host-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66054 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug ada/79542] [7/8 regression] GNAT bug box

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/78238] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: verify_gimple failed, with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/45397] [5/6 Regression] Issues with integer narrowing conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/68210] nothrow operator fails to call default new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

  1   2   >