https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80500
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80497
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80499
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80500
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41251
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41251&action=edit
gcc8-pr80500.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79814
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 24 07:33:20 2017
New Revision: 247089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-24 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/79814
* pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79814
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2972
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 24 07:34:51 2017
New Revision: 247090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-24 Richard Biener
PR c++/2972
* tree-ssa-un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 2972, which changed state.
Bug 2972 Summary: -Wuninitialized could warn about uninitialized member
variable usage in constructors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2972
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79725
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79725
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 24 07:48:47 2017
New Revision: 247091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79725
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80482
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80490
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The DWARF in the dwo looks ok to me so this is a gdb bug. gdb only knows
f and g in ossia::...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80500
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80499
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Do you have a C fragment producing this RTL?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #2 from jonne ---
Thanks Martin. I tried to run it with gdb.
With gdb, I seem to get an unknown signal immediately.
(running gdb as root at the moment, because of an issue with code-signing)
# gdb ./a.out
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.12.1
Copyri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80503
Bug ID: 80503
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 on
ppc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #3 from jonne ---
Read somewhere that I need to do this to make gdb work on Sierra. Not sure what
it all means...
$ cat ~/.gdbinit
set startup-with-shell off
After doing that, I get a different result running gdb.
$ sudo /usr/local
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #2 from Uroš
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #4 from jonne ---
I managed to code-sign gdb by following
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/BuildingOnDarwin.
Not that I expect it to matter much related to this ticket, but I also noticed
the stacktrace looks a little different when I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Adjusted testcase for the testsuite:
signed char v = 0;
static signed char
foo (int x, int y)
{
return x << y;
}
__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) int
bar (void)
{
return foo (v >= 0, __CHAR_BIT__ - 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090
Venkataramanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #6 from Venkataram
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80490
--- Comment #3 from Jean-Michaël Celerier ---
Okay, I reported on their bug tracker. I guess this issue can be closed ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
My constructor for main looks as follows:
_GLOBAL__sub_I_00099_1_main:
.LFB7137:
.cfi_startproc
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset 6, -16
movq%rsp, %rb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #6 from jonne ---
I installed gdb with homebrew. I think it was compiled with debugging symbols,
because of:
$ otool -Iv /usr/local/opt/gdb/bin/gdb | head -5
/usr/local/opt/gdb/bin/gdb:
Indirect symbols for (__TEXT,__stubs) 452 entri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #7 from jonne ---
I compiled with -S and looked at m.s.
I'm not sure, but my main function could be this (I found this code in m.s, by
searching for 'main', lines 4058 - 4095):
lC6:
.ascii "foo test 123\0"
.space 51
.text
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, combine_simplify_rtx turns:
(set (reg:CCNO 17 flags)
(compare:CCNO (subreg:QI (and:SI (lshiftrt:SI (reg:SI 97)
(const_int 24 [0x18]))
(const_int 128 [0x80])) 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80493
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72845
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70142
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Last reconfirmed|201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80493
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
PR 66256 is the accepts-invalid front-end bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80504
Bug ID: 80504
Summary: missing qualification causes ADL to be used in
std::ref / std::cref
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80504
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Comment on attachment 41252
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41252
gcc8-pr80501.patch
> && exact_log2 (UINTVAL (XEXP (inner, 1)))
>- >= GET_MODE_BITSIZ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78849
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozef.l at somniumtech dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 41252 [details]
> gcc8-pr80501.patch
>
> > && exact_log2 (UINTVAL (XEXP (inner, 1)))
> >- >= GET_MODE_BITSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80493
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Apr 24 11:40:02 2017
New Revision: 247093
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247093&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80493 fix invalid exception specification
PR libstd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80504
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Apr 24 11:40:07 2017
New Revision: 247094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80504 qualify calls to avoid ADL
PR libstdc++/80504
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with my r230856. I'll have a look.
C testcase:
struct S { unsigned long long low, hi; };
struct S
add (struct S *a, struct S *b)
{
struct S s;
s.low = a->low + b->low;
s.hi = a->hi + b->hi + (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> No, >= GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) + 1 could be written as > GET_MODE_BITSIZE
> (mode)
Ah, indeed, sorry for mixup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, we're not searching for main function, but _GLOBAL__sub_I_00099_1_m.cpp
(which is a static constructor) and I'm interested in instructions in the
function. Please use gdb once more time, go to frame (#14)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78587
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69412
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 24 11:57:53 2017
New Revision: 247095
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80494
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #9 from jonne ---
Ok, I've done that now. Thanks again.
$ gdb ./a.out
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.12.1
... snip ...
Reading symbols from ./a.out...Reading symbols from
/private/tmp/a.out.dSYM/Contents/Resources/DWARF/a.out...done.
done.
(gdb) r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505
Bug ID: 80505
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline
"hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 41253
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41253&action=edit
dump file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506
Bug ID: 80506
Summary: Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
What progress do you expect? IBM long double does not support non-default
rounding. This will be fixed when PPC64LE long double defaults to IEEE 128 bit
floating point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79375
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #7)
> What progress do you expect? IBM long double does not support non-default
> rounding. This will be fixed when PPC64LE long double defaults to IEEE 128
> bit flo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Huh, no debugging symbols so hard to guess where lead all the jumps. I would
try to add breakpoint to '__asan_init'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79078
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477
--- Comment #11 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Janus,
I'll take a look tonight. I believe, without the source in front of me, that
s/gfc_add_expr_to_block (&post, gfc_call_free
(tmp));/gfc_add_expr_to_block (&se->post, gfc_cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80378
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
I tested it now and the inline trick doesn't work. Here's a test case
extern void *do_alloc(int a, int b);
static inline __attribute__((alloc_size(1))) void check_alloc_size(int size)
{
}
static inline void *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41237|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
std::min/max was used in the backend previously too, so it is your decision and
doesn't need to be changed to resolve this regression.
Do you have arm32 patch too, or would it be helpful if I write one simil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
--- Comment #25 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 41255
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41255&action=edit
AArch32 wip patch.
- There are some line > 80 characters, cosmetic issues in this patch .
- However t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79078
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #9)
> PR 61754 seems to be related.
I think for the examples here it makes no difference if you use
__attribute__((deprecated(""))) or [[deprecated("")]]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Apr 24 13:16:34 2017
New Revision: 247097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix (PR middle-end/79931)
2017-04-24 Jan Hubicka
PR middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79078
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10)
> (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #9)
> > PR 61754 seems to be related.
>
> I think for the examples here it makes no difference if you use
> __attri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Apr 24 13:43:19 2017
New Revision: 247099
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247099&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80506 fix constant used in condition
PR libstdc++/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80482
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah, I was going to try something like that. There are some other places this
probably need to be done too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80482
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If you want the fix in 7.1, please post is soon (best later today).
; s++)
{
syscall_7 (0);
syscall_7 (1);
}
}
$ gcc -S -O2 -dp -v ...
Configured with: ../../gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7-branch/configure
--prefix=/local/gnu/install/gcc-7-host --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-checking=release --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80507
Bug ID: 80507
Summary: [C++17] static variable definition not emitted with
-std=c++1z when defined as constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Apr 24 14:48:43 2017
New Revision: 247102
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247102&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Subject: Backport r247097
2017-04-24 Martin Liska
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #4)
> The 2 last inline asms are missing the set of ESI.
You should mark that "Some Code" asm clobbers %esi.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80497
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|NE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80378
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0.1
Known to fail|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80378
--- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen ---
In the kernel there is also an upper limit on allocations.
Perhaps just a generic assert builtin that:
- uses value range information
- uses constant propagation
- is a nop when the compiler doesn't have either
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #4)
>
> > The 2 last inline asms are missing the set of ESI.
>
> You should mark that "Some Code" asm clobbers %esi.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80507
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm not sure if the PR 59123 change was meant to apply to static data members.
The example in PR 59123 is valid C++, but your code is not.
In any case, the change in semantics is almost certainly due to th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Apr 24 15:13:39 2017
New Revision: 247104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 80293] Dont totally-scalarize char arrays
2017-04-24 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80378
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov ---
This sounds like a separate problem that is solvable via __builtin_constant_p?
For example:
void link_error(void) __attribute__((error("size check failed")));
if (__builtin_constant_p(size) &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Happens in fre3 pass.
The pass starts with:
do_syscalls ()
{
register int reg __asm__ (*4);
register int reg __asm__ (*4);
int s;
[33.33%]:
reg = 0;
__asm__ __volatile__("/* Some Code %0 */" :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80378
--- Comment #8 from Andi Kleen ---
__builtin_constant_p does not cover variable range information, which is what
we're looking for here to prevent security bugs.
Also in my experience these explicit expressions tend to be somewhat fragile
and is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41256
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41256&action=edit
gcc8-pr80491.patch
The conditional jump is part of the overflow checking optabs, the expectation
was that we ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80479
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
