[Bug c/80441] New: Spurious Warnings with -Wmissing-field-initializers

2017-04-16 Thread Vaelatern at voidlinux dot eu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80441 Bug ID: 80441 Summary: Spurious Warnings with -Wmissing-field-initializers Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/68569] ICE with automatic character object and DATA

2017-04-16 Thread koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68569 Nicolas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/80442] New: Rejects DATA statement with array slice

2017-04-16 Thread koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80442 Bug ID: 80442 Summary: Rejects DATA statement with array slice Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority

[Bug fortran/80442] Rejects DATA statement with array slice

2017-04-16 Thread koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80442 Nicolas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80442] Rejects DATA statement with array slice

2017-04-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80442 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With 4.8 I get the following error pr80442.f90:5.10: data (j(i:i), i=1,4) /1, 2, 3, 4/ 1 Error: Nonconstant array section at (1) in DATA statement The code compiles and runs if I repla

[Bug fortran/80440] Slow compile when USEing modules

2017-04-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80440 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- See also the discussion starting at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-04/msg00039.html find_symtree_for_symbol was originally introduced in r121824 for PR 30554.

[Bug libstdc++/80432] std::pow gives wrong results for long double arguments

2017-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80432 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Hao Zhang from comment #2) > both my CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS environment variables are empty. That's irrelevant, GCC doesn't care about those environment variables. (In reply to Hao Zhang from co

gdb doesn't get argc right

2017-04-16 Thread Don Viszneki
Hi all, I'm using standard Ubuntu releases of gcc (5.4.0) and gdb (7.11.1) and I have a very simple to reproduce issue on x86-64. I think I've included all the necessary information in this paste: https://gist.github.com/hdon/3f96a8a6b67e078e0213660ec6245677 Please let me know if there more inf

[Bug tree-optimization/80443] New: ICE on valid code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:367

2017-04-16 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80443 Bug ID: 80443 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:367 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev