https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Apr 11 21:07:32 2017
New Revision: 246858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80294 - ICE with constexpr and inheritance.
* con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80098
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 41180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41180&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80315
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Apr 11 21:37:16 2017
New Revision: 246859
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-11 Bill Schmidt
PR target/80376
PR target/80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Apr 11 21:37:16 2017
New Revision: 246859
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-11 Bill Schmidt
PR target/80376
PR target/80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Backports still needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80315
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Backports still needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77671
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to janus from comment #12)
> Created attachment 41179 [details]
> reduced test case
>
> I managed to boil down the test case to a more compact form, see the
> attached file.
>
> Note that it does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80388
--- Comment #2 from Glenn Hyland ---
Sorry - hit return too early. Example code below (example.f90) generates ICE at
varasm.c:4986 ...
program example
integer, parameter :: r8 = selected_real_kind(14,30)
type test
real (r8) :: computation_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80352
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Thank you for the report. I'll investigate the problem. A few hours ago I've
committed an additional patch. It might solve the problem. I'll check it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #16)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #13)
> > it seems better than abusing __builtin_constant_p, which is getting
> > contradictory requirements from its various
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80402
Bug ID: 80402
Summary: Missed optimization on x86/x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80352
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #2)
> Thank you for the report. I'll investigate the problem. A few hours ago
> I've committed an additional patch. It might solve the problem. I'll check
> i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80388
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403
Bug ID: 80403
Summary: UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in
binary expression" message in / and % expr
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80404
Bug ID: 80404
Summary: UBSAN: compile time crash with "non-trivial conversion
at assignment" error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80405
Bug ID: 80405
Summary: UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in shift
expression" error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80388
--- Comment #4 from Glenn Hyland ---
Thanks. I'm already at the latest gFortran release for my platform "Ubuntu
16.04.2 LTS". Not prepared at this stage to go to a development version of
Ubuntu that would include a newer compiler version.
I'm ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80406
Bug ID: 80406
Summary: Reduced false positive test case for -Warray-bounds
with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77857
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Apr 12 04:26:15 2017
New Revision: 246864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/77857
cmd/go: generate vendor paths for -I arg on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77857
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE with |[5/6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Author: jakub
> Date: Tue Apr 11 17:21:51 2017
> New Revision: 246851
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246851&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> PR middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80349
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 12 06:12:26 2017
New Revision: 246865
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246865&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80349
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) : Conv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #7)
> Looking at the diff file, where is the change in line 2744?
> "int count = INTVAL (XEXP (op0, 1));"
>
> Old and new look the same to me.
Whitespace fix, space
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80406
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80399
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Related case (but I know it goes down a different path) is:
struct ss
{
int aa;
int s;
};
int
f(int a, struct ss *rn, int i)
{
return rn[i-1].s == a;
}
Which shows up in SPEC INT.
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
