https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80200
--- Comment #4 from Roman ---
Sorry,
here is the output of gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/roman/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80103
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |6.3.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80238
Bug ID: 80238
Summary: genmatch.c:(.text.startup+0x66c6): undefined reference
to `operator delete(void*, unsigned long)'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80178
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
Bug ID: 80239
Summary: [7 regression] 9% regression on dhrystone when
targetting Cortex-M7
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Component|rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53383
--- Comment #26 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Mar 28 16:51:00 2017
New Revision: 246543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246543&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/53383
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ra |
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Component|rtl-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57796
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente ---
Created attachment 41070
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41070&action=edit
self contained benchmark of scimark2 SparseMat must
content is not randomized
param must be modified by ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661
--- Comment #28 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Mar 28 17:01:05 2017
New Revision: 246546
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246546&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-28 Janus Weil
PR fortran/78661
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57796
--- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente ---
added a self contained "benchmark"
on my machine
[innocent@vinavx3 ctest]$ c++ -Ofast -Wall SparseOnly.c -march=native ; time
./a.out
0.496u 0.000s 0:00.49 100.0%0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
[innocent@vinavx3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80225
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov ---
On trunk, manually fixing up inlining is not enough: trunk additionally needs
-fno-tracer, otherwise crucial if-conversion of 'if (k < 0) k += m1;' is
prevented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661
--- Comment #29 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
AFAICS r246546 should fully fix this PR, so I think it can be closed. Do you
agree, Jerry?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh, but it only happens at -O0, so maybe target specific.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62045
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 28 17:18:37 2017
New Revision: 246548
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246548&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/62045 fix O(N) insertion in pd_ds binary heap
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 28 17:18:42 2017
New Revision: 246549
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246549&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80137 use std::nextafter instead of looping
PR libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80238
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's the sized-deallocation function which was new in GCC 5.
How did you configure gcc?
What is your existing compiler that you're using to build it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62045
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression]|[5 Regression]
|__gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80046
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from janus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80046
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The new tests fail on AIX 7.2:
FAIL: 21_strings/headers/cwchar/24012.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/jwakely/build/powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/cwchar:224:
error: '::wcstol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80193
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've reproduced it and started to investigate. It is a very complicated
example. I can not even say right now what is wrong, the check or the
allocation result. I guess it will take some time only to inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #84 from Bernd Edlinger ---
I think the patch should also handle
arrays of unions like:
union BB {
unsigned char x[10];
};
struct B {
BB x[16];
};
struct A {
B b;
};
A a1, a2;
void test()
{
a1.b = a2.b;
}
compiles to:
; Fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
is the diff you show backwards? Otherwise the new code looks distinctly
better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2)
> is the diff you show backwards? Otherwise the new code looks distinctly
> better.
Yes it is, sorry. Diff good bad is:
- add r5, sp, #16
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #19)
> [...]
>
> Here's the output I get:
>
> 63
>
> 65
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881
--- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #19)
>
>> [...]
>>
>> Here's the output I get:
>>
>> 63
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78670
Bug 78670 depends on bug 78661, which changed state.
Bug 78661 Summary: [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80226
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Mar 28 20:08:31 2017
New Revision: 246553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246553&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/80226
* go-gcc.cc (Gcc_backend::return_statem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80226
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80240
Bug ID: 80240
Summary: cannot dynamic_cast variable to intmax_t from variable
of type intmax_t
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80241
Bug ID: 80241
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] Broken error message + ICE with
invalid attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243
Bug ID: 80243
Summary: c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct (or
object?) - same thing
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80193
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
The allocation is correct. Simply there is no rebuilding conflicts after
generations moves on region edges (there are a lot of them, about 100) for LRA
as LRA does not need the conflict info from IRA.
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80193
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Mar 28 20:55:38 2017
New Revision: 246554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246554&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-28 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/80193
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243
--- Comment #1 from Jim Michaels ---
#include
#include
typedef struct {std::string s;int i;} Structsb;
Structsb fn(std::string s1, int i1) {
return {s1,i1};
}
int main() {}
Structsb structsb=fn("string",1);
return strustsb.i;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80244
Bug ID: 80244
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE with attribute in template alias
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80240
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80234
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43496
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Mar 28 22:26:17 2017
New Revision: 246555
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246555&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix gcc.target/powerpc/gcse-1.c for PIC (PR43496)
With PIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80193
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534
--- Comment #4 from Brian Rzycki ---
Hi James, thank you for taking the time to test this. Unfortunately I can't
post the original code because of its license. The problem is with the
weighting changing enough that at least one pair of if conditi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80246
Bug ID: 80246
Summary: Builtin's for POWER's dxex[q] and diex[q] use the
wrong types
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80246
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
bergner@pike:~/gcc/BUGS/LTC137326$ cat dxex.i
long
dxex (_Decimal64 arg)
{
return __builtin_dxex (arg);
}
bergner@pike:~/gcc/BUGS/LTC137326$ gcc -O2 -mcpu=power8 -S dxex.i
bergner@pike:~/gcc/BUGS/LTC13732
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80246
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2017-3-28
--- Comment #2 from Peter Berg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80246
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2017-03-28 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80204
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
macOS 10.12.4 includes kernel version 16.5.0.
The command line tools have been updated: clang cc1 is now version
8.1.0 (clang-802.0.38). It still specifies -macosx_version_min 10.12.0 at
link tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66689
--- Comment #3 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
Well, for whatever reason, TR29124 and C++17 chose the - in front of \nu.
As long as we document and warn I think this isn't a defect.
I'll dig through the docs and get back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80233
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247
Bug ID: 80247
Summary: 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
101 - 160 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
