https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80205
Bug ID: 80205
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in walk_ssa_copies at
ipa-polymorphic-call.c:835
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80206
Bug ID: 80206
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #50 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #44)
> Created attachment 41048 [details]
> trial patch
>
> Does this fix the issue? I don't have an ARM setup handy for testing.
I should.
Note that what changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0.1
Summary|[5/6/7 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 27 07:35:44 2017
New Revision: 246490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-27 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/80171
* gim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80207
Bug ID: 80207
Summary: ICE on invalid code in comptypes at cp/typeck.c:1434
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80170
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 27 08:07:49 2017
New Revision: 246491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246491&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80170
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80208
Bug ID: 80208
Summary: DJGPP max object file alignment regression
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80168
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 27 08:25:01 2017
New Revision: 246492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246492&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80168
* asan.c (instrument_derefs): Copy over
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80193
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80194
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80209
Bug ID: 80209
Summary: libgo test failure, dir gotest$$ not found
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80201
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80202
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Bug ID: 80210
Summary: ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 on ppc64 for
with __builtin_pow
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80211
Bug ID: 80211
Summary: ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3816
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80181
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so we have
dl_7 = vp_2 ^ _1;
dl_8 = dl_7 ^ vp_2;
where in the first iteration dl_7 is optimistically _1 (vp_2 is 0) and
thus this gets simplified to dl_7 (CONSTANT). While
in the 2nd iteration it is V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||djgpp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80186
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197
>
> Uroš Bizjak changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80207
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80206
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We need to handle targets without C99's nextafter, but maybe this would be OK:
if (__builtin_expect(__ret >= _RealType(1), 0))
{
#if _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1
__ret = std::nextafter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #51 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Doesn't 3.10/10 explicitly say that it is undefined to use a union to
to move an object representation that is not a member of the union?
"If a program attempts to access the stored value of an object thro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80191
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Martin, that might be nice for IDEs too, which can presumably aren't restricted
to using a single font like most terminals.
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #2)
> But then shouldn't it be spelled "n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #52 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
>
> --- Comment #51 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> Doesn't 3.10/10 explicitly say th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #53 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #52)
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
> >
> > --- Comment #51 from Bernd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80212
Bug ID: 80212
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: error: comdat-local function
called by virtual
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80200
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Roman from comment #0)
> Hello,
>
> while building the Subversion tree (Revision 246482) the following error
> occurs:
>
> In file included from /home/roman/gcc-source/libdecnumber/decNumber.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80200
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |bootstrap
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80213
Bug ID: 80213
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:704
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80172
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80200
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
That looks like someone is using -Wsystem-headers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80172
--- Comment #3 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de ---
Thank you for your feedback!
With std::array it works without a problem :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80214
Bug ID: 80214
Summary: ICE in s390_initial_elimination_offset, at
config/s390/s390.c:10249
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80193
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #54 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
>
> --- Comment #53 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80213
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80212
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80179
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80179
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80186
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
I believe this can be fixed by checking the return value of
grok_ctor_properties (consistently with its other usage in decl.c):
Index: pt.c
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80179
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r231665.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 27 10:50:55 2017
New Revision: 246494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-27 Richard Biener
PR ipa/79776
* tree-ssa-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80215
Bug ID: 80215
Summary: VN has trouble with conditional equivalences (DOM/FRE)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80206
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
There are tons of issues in the vec_extract* patterns.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80193
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80206
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Cleaned up testcase -ffloat-store -mavx512f:
typedef double v4df __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (4 * sizeof (double;
typedef double v8df __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8 * sizeof (double;
v8df a;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #55 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #53)
> The boost code was: "this->functor = f.functor;"
And I still don't understand why may_alias doesn't help on the type of
this->functor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #56 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think may_alias attribute only affects pointers/references (pointer/reference
to may_alias type is considered to reference any type), but in this->functor =
f.functor the only pointer is this and *this lik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #57 from Jonathan Wakely ---
OK, so this appears to work (assuming may_alias on function_buffer):
function_buffer& aliasing_ref = f.functor;
this->functor = aliasing_ref;
It changes the GIMPLE from:
f1_2(D)->D.2297.functor =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #58 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But this seemingly equivalent code doesn't work:
this->functor = static_cast(f.functor);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80114
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #16 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Also still reproducible in Debian. LibreOffice just failed to build with the
same problem [1]:
S=/<> && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p
$W/CxxObject/tools/source/generic/ $W/Dep/CxxObj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80216
Bug ID: 80216
Summary: [7 Regression] Memory hog w/ -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: memory-hog
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80217
Bug ID: 80217
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in set_ssa_name_value (deep
recursion in derive_equivalencs_from_bit_ior)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80218
Bug ID: 80218
Summary: [6/7 Regression] tree-call-cdce does not update block
frequencies
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80219
Bug ID: 80219
Summary: relative line numbers only working if
gcc_{error,warning}_prefix defined
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80218
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80068
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80220
Bug ID: 80220
Summary: relative line numbers don't work when put between
braces
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80218
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
A simple test case is:
#include
void
f (float *x)
{
x[0] = sqrtf (x[0]);
}
which ought to spill x only when a call to sqrtf is needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80220
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 41056
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41056&action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
--- Comment #5 from Julian Taylor ---
I have been searching for a workaround as this has pretty bad performance
impact in my usecase. I found that putting this into the inplace conditional
#pragma GCC ivdep
allows it to be vectorized again with g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So this is another case where the conditional propagation happens so that
if (a == b)
{
... = deref a;
... = deref b;
}
turns into
if (a == b)
{
... = deref b;
... = der
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80181
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 27 12:52:13 2017
New Revision: 246500
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246500&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80181
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221
Bug ID: 80221
Summary: Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to
relative line numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 41057
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41057&action=edit
tentative patch
This script tries to rewrite all tests, but that's not entirely supported yet.
Known error caus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |8.0
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Also, I assume this is only a problem for -std=c++98 or -std=gnu++98, because
if the system headers don't declare those functions for C++11 and later
dialects then that's a bug in those system headers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #19)
> (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #4)
> > Historically, on some systems one had to define _POSIX_C_SOURCE to get at
> > fileno(), which has been used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #59 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
>
> --- Comment #58 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> But this seemingly equivalent code doesn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137
--- Comment #3 from John Salmon ---
It's easy to overthink this. 0.0 is perfectly acceptable, as is any other
_RealType in the range [0, 1.). But since rounding was, presumably, to-nearest
or up, it's slightly disconcerting that 0.0 is neither
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80222
Bug ID: 80222
Summary: may_alias folded away
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80222
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #60 from Richard Biener ---
-> PR80222
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80216
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80216
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 80217 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #61 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #59)
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
> >
> > --- Comment #58 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80218
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #62 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #44)
> Created attachment 41048 [details]
> trial patch
>
> Does this fix the issue? I don't have an ARM setup handy for testing.
Yes. I just tried, it and the cra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80170
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0.1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
Bug ID: 80223
Summary: RFE: Exclude functions from profile instrumentation
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Not so easy though as profiling happens after inlining.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80224
Bug ID: 80224
Summary: gcov -i crashes with two arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
