https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80183
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #3 from Markus Tri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80195
Bug ID: 80195
Summary: Message build from untranslated string concatenation
in fortran/resolve.c:14529
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Bug ID: 80196
Summary: fenv_t not declared
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #1 from Roman ---
I configured the build as follows:
/home/roman/gcc-source/configure
Best regards,
Roman
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #2 from Roman ---
Revision 246482.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80183
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80191
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80183
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Sun Mar 26 12:33:35 2017
New Revision: 246483
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246483&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR80183 : _M_color not moved
PR libstdc++/80183
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe PR 40974 again, which nobody can reproduce as it only happens due to some
system-specific weirdness. We need more information about your system, what
kind of OS distro are you using? etc. etc.
Could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80183
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #4 from Roman ---
Thank you for your quick response.
I am using Gentoo. I'll give that option a try.
The build system is:
/usr/local/bin/gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 7.0.1 20170304 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80191
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
But then shouldn't it be spelled "new-initializer", not "new initializer"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38822
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> AFAICS everthing is fixed here. Can we close this PR?
Without objection I'll proceed.
-enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--enable-lto -enable-libitm -disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.1 20170326 (experimental) [trunk revision 246482] (GCC)
gcc -O2 fullMC.c -g
real0m0.489s
user0m0.485s
sys 0m0.002s
Performance counter stats for './a.out':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
Bug ID: 80198
Summary: does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53542
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
From comment 0, obvious patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c2017-03-22 17:29:45.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/expr.c 2017-03-26 16:12:21.0 +0200
@@ -2591,7 +2591,7 @@ gfc_check_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
Julian Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|does not vectorize generic |regression, does not
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79434
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80199
Bug ID: 80199
Summary: Wlogical-op inconsistent from int to float ?
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80184
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79434
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Dominiq,
As soon as I have a minute or two, I will back port it. My business is
taking me 7/7 at the moment.
Thanks for the reminder.
Paul
On 26 March 2017 at 17:36, dominiq at l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
Julian Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|regression, does not|regression [6/7], does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
r233207
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917
Julian Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jtaylor.debian at googlemail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80200
Bug ID: 80200
Summary: decNumber.c : error : #include_next is a GCC extension
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Roman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80201
Bug ID: 80201
Summary: groff build fails with -floop-nest-optimize
-fgraphite-identity
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80202
Bug ID: 80202
Summary: Spurious warning "array subscript is below array
bounds" with if-statement and char to unsigned int
conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80183
--- Comment #7 from François Dumont ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> I think this is my fault, I asked François to remove a store to _M_color
> that I thought was redundant.
I was surprised that _M_color wasn't move along with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80189
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
To me that would be fine since then I had not even looked at what the %qs might
be. But like the code is now, I suspected the %s to be part of the grammar of
the diagnostic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79434
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 26 20:01:07 2017
New Revision: 246486
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246486&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-26 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79434
* parse.c (check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79434
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80203
Bug ID: 80203
Summary: libiberty fails to compile regex.c correctly when gcc
is configured --with-sysroot
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78670
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80204
Bug ID: 80204
Summary: macosx-version-min wrong for macOS Sierra 10.12.3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80191
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80199
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38822
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38822
--- Comment #21 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #19)
> > AFAICS everthing is fixed here. Can we close this PR?
>
> Without objection I'll proceed.
Should the bug be fixed before proceeding? See c
41 matches
Mail list logo