https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Mar 19 09:54:41 2017
New Revision: 246267
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246267&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-19 Dominique d'Humieres
PR target/71017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Mar 19 10:00:27 2017
New Revision: 246268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-19 Dominique d'Humieres
PR target/71017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79138
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79549
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80096
Bug ID: 80096
Summary: [c++1z] ICE with auto template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35878
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80097
Bug ID: 80097
Summary: internal compiler error in c_fully_fold_internal with
std=c89 and -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80097
--- Comment #1 from Max Bruckner ---
Created attachment 41000
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41000&action=edit
Makefile with the compiler options necessary to reproduce the bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80097
--- Comment #2 from Max Bruckner ---
I already created a bug report in the Archlinux bug tracker here:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53368 but I could also reproduce the bug on
Ubuntu 16.04.2 with GCC 5.4.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80097
Max Bruckner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||max at maxbruckner dot de
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67338
--- Comment #1 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still in 7.0.1
../../gcc-7-246252/gcc/fold-const.c:14253:11: runtime error: negation of
-2147483648 cannot be represented in type 'int'; cast to an unsigned type to
negate this value to itself
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67359
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80097
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35878
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
It shouldn't be very hard, there is a variable check_new in build_new_1 in
cp/init.c, we need to recognize the standard placement new (not sure what the
best way is to do that) and set check_new to false in tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71910
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||agadethrowaway at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80098
Bug ID: 80098
Summary: ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3816
on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80099
Bug ID: 80099
Summary: ICE in rs6000_expand_vector_extract, at
config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7450
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #7 from Tavian Barnes ---
> the warning is issued for variables which are alive after return from longjmp
> but not marked as volatile. Such variables will have undefined value
> according to C standard
> (http://pubs.opengroup.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80077
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 20 02:22:36 2017
New Revision: 246272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80077 - error with constexpr and -fno-elide-constructors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80077
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 20 02:22:43 2017
New Revision: 246273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80084 - wrong C++17 decomposition by reference of parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #8 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #6)
> the warning is issued for variables which are alive after return
> from longjmp
Meant setjmp of course.
26 matches
Mail list logo