https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886
Bug ID: 79886
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in pp_format, at
pretty-print.c:681
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
This is probably a warning from the middle end with a printf %-code not
supported by the Fortran FE's pretty printer. The solution is to either add
support for it in the FE or switch to the middle end p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79880
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79880
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps something to report to llvm that they accept invalid, that is a bug.
Also, why do you use Intel syntax when you don't know how should it be used?
In AT&T syntax you wouldn't need to specify this extr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79887
Bug ID: 79887
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in set_uid_loop_bbs, at
tree-vectorizer.c:482
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
>
> Jeffrey A. Law changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79888
Bug ID: 79888
Summary: ICE in gfc_warning with -Warray-temporaries
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79887
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
A simpler test-case from our test-suite:
$ gcc
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-trapping-math-1.c -O3
--param vect-epilogues-nomask=1 -mavx512ifma
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryxi at stu dot xidian.edu.cn
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #9)
> Maybe we just need to declare this address to be invalid for TImode. The
> following seems to cure the testcase; untested otherwise.
>
> Index: i386.c
> ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79889
Bug ID: 79889
Summary: ICE in aarch64_process_target_attr, at
config/aarch64/aarch64.c:9537
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-inval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890
Bug ID: 79890
Summary: ICE in s390_initial_elimination_offset, at
config/s390/s390.c:10430
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891
Bug ID: 79891
Summary: Wrong count of
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79892
Bug ID: 79892
Summary: ICE in processing of target attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79893
Bug ID: 79893
Summary: ICE in s390_adjust_builtin_arglist in
gcc/config/s390/s390-c.c:679
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
Bug ID: 79894
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at
fortran/trans.c:159
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79895
Bug ID: 79895
Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79856
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note that internal_error will terminate GCC immediately while error () allows
for further errors to be diagnosed. Which is what we want here, internal_error
is done as the final step in "CFG verification fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79856
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So maybe we instead want a internal_error_cont () which will not end
compilation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79857
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
No, see other bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79858
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
It's a few uppercase letters, like forming QImode, not to be translated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79896
Bug ID: 79896
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11950 on ARM
target
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79862
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79897
Bug ID: 79897
Summary: ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627 on ARM
target
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79874
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Yep, see some other similar bugs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79898
Bug ID: 79898
Summary: ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1554 on ARM target
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79862
--- Comment #2 from Sumit ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note GCC 4.8.1 is no longer maintained.
Hi Richard,
I understand that 4.8.1 is no longer supported.
Actually, our project in current state can't move to any version be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79881
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79899
Bug ID: 79899
Summary: ICE in ctor_omit_inherited_parms at
gcc/cp/method.c:576 on ARM target
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-inva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79862
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
--disable-hosted-libstdcxx \
That is more likely the cause. non-hosted libstdc++ is not well tested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79900
Bug ID: 79900
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at
cp/tree.c:1554
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79862
--- Comment #4 from Sumit ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> --disable-hosted-libstdcxx \
>
> That is more likely the cause. non-hosted libstdc++ is not well tested.
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the comments.
Actually, when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79855
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79901
Bug ID: 79901
Summary: ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3904
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79902
Bug ID: 79902
Summary: ICE in rebuild_frequencies, at predict.c:3689
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79903
Bug ID: 79903
Summary: When building RTEMS for SPARC with Ada support, the
build fails because of missing #ifdef
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79904
Bug ID: 79904
Summary: ICE in annotate_constant_pool_refs, at
config/s390/s390.c:7909
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79905
Bug ID: 79905
Summary: ICE in canonical types differ for identical types
__vector(4) int and V4i {aka __vector(4) int}
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> If you up from the ICE case up to gt_pch_nx_die_struct frame, it would be
> interesting if you can figure out what x is would be print_die (x, s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79906
Bug ID: 79906
Summary: ICE in rs6000_inner_target_options, at
config/rs6000/rs6000.c:39199
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79907
Bug ID: 79907
Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213 on
ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908
Bug ID: 79908
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr (gimplify.c:12155) gimplification
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
I see a similar test-case on ppc64le-linux-gnu (w/ cross-compiler):
$ ppc64le-linux-gnu-g++
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/compat/decimal/return-6_x.C
-mno-popcntd -Og
In file included fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79909
Bug ID: 79909
Summary: ICE error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn on
ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79876
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79783
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Mar 6 10:20:33 2017
New Revision: 245912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in use-after-scope w/ -fno-tree-dce (PR sanitize/79783).
2017-03-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79783
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
>
> Bug ID: 79894
>Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_mod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79824
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so in the SLP case this is actually safe because we only ever load vectors
that end up having at least a single element used (we do not load from unused
gaps). In the non-SLP case I botched up the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Note while we've tried to enforce this strict rules I don't think any checking
code ever come to fruit actually verifying that calling fold_* (.., type, ...)
produces a tree of TREE_TYPE () == type.
So it w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
The ICE needs to be fixed, of course, by what is the idea behind executing the
mips testsuite on s390?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79788
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Btw. can MPX be used for 32-bit binaries? Is it supported by ICC?
MPX is supported on 32-bit i686, but not on x32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6)
> > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> > If you up from the ICE case up to gt_pch_nx_die_struct frame, it would be
> > interesting if you can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I do some basic fuzzing. This test-case just uses builtins, thus I consider it
generic enough to report it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt ---
Not reproduceable here with r245913. Is it gone with a recent Gcc?
Gcc configured with --with-arch=zEC12 and compiled without explicit options:
$ ~/src/gcc/install-master/bin/gcc
~/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I see the ICE with cross-compiler (on x86_64-linux-gnu), compiled with
--target=s390x-linux-gnu.
$ s390x-linux-gnu-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=s390x-linux-gnu-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/marxin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79862
--- Comment #5 from Sumit ---
(In reply to Sumit from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > --disable-hosted-libstdcxx \
> >
> > That is more likely the cause. non-hosted libstdc++ is not well tested.
>
Hi Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79880
--- Comment #4 from Petr ---
In this case, DWORD PTR is redundant, nasm and yasm is fine with the syntax I
posted as well.
It's a simplified test just to show that it won't pass.
Try:
__asm(".intel_syntax\n"
"vpgatherdd xmm4, dword pt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79812
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 6 11:35:58 2017
New Revision: 245915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79812
* config/i386/sse.md (VI8F_256_512): Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79880
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, if you want to avoid the %xmm4, %r13, %xmm3, etc., you need .intel_syntax
noprefix.
And, the insn is invalid anyway, because you can't have the same mask and
destination.
In any case, this has nothing to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79812
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64574
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is already fixed in trunk. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6)
[...]
> Ah, so it will be most likely that
> DW_AT_const_value: floating-point or ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 40891
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40891&action=edit
> gcc7-pr79821.patch
>
> Untested fix. This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64574
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 6 11:54:37 2017
New Revision: 245916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64574
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64574
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79880
--- Comment #6 from Petr ---
Ok, that's fair enough. I didn't know GCC needs an additional option to switch
to fully compatible Intel syntax. The code that I posted works fine in clang,
so sorry about that.
And yes, the instruction will #UD, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #10)
> I'd just applied your patch on top of the failing rev: stage1 now
> completes successfully.
Glad to hear that.
> I can also run a full bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
OTOH this is really GIGO - the frontend feeds us with incompatible types
(there's only one complex type per scalar type).
So I am testing
Index: gcc/fortran/trans.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79910
Bug ID: 79910
Summary: [7 Regression] wrong code with -O -fweb
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79910
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79911
Bug ID: 79911
Summary: VEC_SELECT bugs in arm neon patterns
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912
Bug ID: 79912
Summary: [7 regression] LRA unable to generate reloads after
r245655
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912
--- Comment #1 from Kito Cheng ---
Update for command to reproduce:
riscv32-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc vfscanf.E.i -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79911
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79913
Bug ID: 79913
Summary: VEC_SELECT bugs in aarch64 patterns
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79913
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79914
Bug ID: 79914
Summary: VEC_SELECT bugs in mips patterns
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79914
mpf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79914
prachee.godbole at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prachee.godbole at gmai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912
mpf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 6 12:48:54 2017
New Revision: 245919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245919&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Richard Biener
PR fortran/79894
* trans.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt ---
Reproduceable on a zEC12 with
$ ./configure --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib
--enable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-gnu-indirect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79893
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79895
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79904
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79910
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79893
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---
A small test program that reproduces the crash:
--
#include
void foo(signed char *p, int i) {
vec_load_bndry(p, i);
}
--
$ gcc -mzvector -mvx -march=z13 -S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79910
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bernds at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
