https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79720
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79396
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE |[5/6 Regression] ICE
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79692
--- Comment #3 from Franz Sirl ---
I can confirm that the patch fixes both the submitted testcase and the original
code.
Thanks for your efforts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79690
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 27 08:50:09 2017
New Revision: 245751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79690
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 27 08:51:28 2017
New Revision: 245752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/45397
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
--- Comment #32 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79720
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> Yeah, exactly. But then this is really NOTABUG. The compile time
> evaluation needs to be .5ulp precise, not emulate whatever precision issues
> the library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #13 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
The latest I have is:
gcc6-devel-6.3.1.s20161229 lang/gcc6-devel
gcc7-devel-7.0.0.s20170101 lang/gcc7-devel
ATM I've no time to build gcc myself.
I'll wait for gerald@ to update these ports a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #12)
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if it helps, but on the assembler level there are only two
> instructions that need to be moved to make the test case pass:
That of cour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79709
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Best split this bug into BIT_INSERT_EXPR foldings (yeah, those mentioned are
missing) and the ira/reload issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77536
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Mon Feb 27 10:20:36 2017
New Revision: 245754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/77536
* tree-ssa-loop-manip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #14 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Anton,
Did you take on board that it is the procedure dummy argument that
causes the problem?
A viable workaround is to:
s/procedure( cgca_clvgs_abstract ) :: sub/external :: sub/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79720
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> When -fcx-fortran-rules is active(by default in Fortran,
> or when explicitly specified by the user) we generate inline
> code. The issue is the same then.
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79709
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Seems to be
void move_assign(function10& f)
{
if (&f == this)
return;
{ try {
if (!f.empty()) {
this->vtable = f.vtable;
if (this->has_trivial_copy_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
w/o SRA the cases look like
[48.23%]:
<&0x7f3d13ec30f0> f = f;
<&0x7f3d13ec3140> MEM[(struct parser_binder *)&D.614964 + 4B] = f;
<&0x7f3d13ec3190> value_405 = (size_t) &stored_vtable.base;
<&0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With -Wsystem-headers there are various warnings, e.g.
/usr/include/boost/function/function_template.hpp:572:11: warning: placement
new constructing an object of type
‘boost::spirit::qi::detail::parser_binde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
But if I change:
-mutable char data;
+mutable char data[sizeof (void *) + 2 * sizeof (bool)];
so that the union field occupies the size of some other union members, the
warning is gone, but I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79676
--- Comment #2 from Adam Hirst ---
Could this be related? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846#c14
> Paul Thomas 2015-07-16 14:52:58 UTC
> OK - this compiles and runs if the PRIVATE statement is removed. As soon as I
> return to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79414
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Fixed in r245440. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79722
Bug ID: 79722
Summary: Missed opportunity for fused multiply/add with avx2
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79414
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Feb 27 11:55:19 2017
New Revision: 245756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-27 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/79414
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79414
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79722
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 40836
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40836&action=edit
Output of icc -O3 -march=core-avx2 -S -o bar-intel.s bar.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79722
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Seems to be
>
> void move_assign(function10& f)
> {
> if (&f == this)
> return;
>
> { try {
> if (!f.empty()) {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79722
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
-mavx2 does not enable fma. Did you try with -mfma, or with a suitable -march
flag?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79723
Bug ID: 79723
Summary: Another case of dropped gs: prefix
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79722
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79681
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
A problem with that information loss due to make_bit_field_ref and its callers
during folding is that there could e.g. be multiple fields that fall into the
range (e.g. inside of union) etc.
The IMHO best fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57353
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79724
Bug ID: 79724
Summary: please respect calling gnat tools configured with
--program-suffix and --program-prefix
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79725
Bug ID: 79725
Summary: Sinking opportunity missed if complex type is changed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379
--- Comment #24 from Thomas Koenig ---
Could be a good idea to add a version with -mfma to the flags for AVX2.
I'll see what I can do. It might be too late for gcc 7, and I also
don't have an AVX2 machine to test on.
Might also be a good idea t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79681
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I was thinking about
--- fold-const.c.jj12017-02-17 18:29:24.0 +0100
+++ fold-const.c2017-02-27 14:49:13.816203253 +0100
@@ -3862,6 +3862,39 @@ make_bit_field_ref (location_t loc, tree
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79681
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Of course !in_gimple_form.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79725
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79681
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40837
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40837&action=edit
gcc7-pr79681.patch
This seems to work though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79726
Bug ID: 79726
Summary: Type conversion not vectorisde
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69617
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79727
Bug ID: 79727
Summary: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 doesn't seem to match any
comments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The MEM[(struct parser_binder *)&D.614964 + 4B] = f;'s ultimate origin is:
if (D.589607 != 0B)
{
iftmp.77 = try
{
MEM[(struct parser_binder *)D.589607] = f;
^^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79727
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |8.0
--- Comment #61 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
--- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Mon Feb 27 16:06:13 2017
New Revision: 245762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245762&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79544
* config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (struct altivec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
Bug ID: 79728
Summary: ice in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:912
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71749
Claudiu Zissulescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claziss at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70057
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||orion at cora dot nwra.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79729
Bug ID: 79729
Summary: ICE in ix86_print_operand, at config/i386/i386.c:18231
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or perhaps makefiles filtering away -Wall or using -Wno-all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79730
Bug ID: 79730
Summary: ICE tree check: expected var_decl, have function_decl
in finish_decl, at c/c-decl.c:5063
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79731
Bug ID: 79731
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5)
> With gcc 7.0.1-0.10.fc26 I'm starting to see errors like:
>
> cc1plus: error: -Wformat-security ignored without -Wformat
> [-Werror=format-security]
>
> If th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79730
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski ---
Created attachment 40838
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40838&action=edit
/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.7.2/Utilities/KWIML/test/test.c
/usr/lib64/ccache/gcc -DKWIML_LANGUAGE_C -DKWI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79732
Bug ID: 79732
Summary: ICE in set_ssa_default_def, at tree-dfa.c:327
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
--- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski ---
Ah, just got the -Wno-format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79734
Bug ID: 79734
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79733
Bug ID: 79733
Summary: ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:406
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79730
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with
commit 2be90eed86f43591d0e182b258156356abb7f18f
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 6 14:05:54 2011 +
2011-07-06 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/49645
* c-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79730
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79731
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79732
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79732
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
No warning issued, but it doesn't look valid?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79733
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski ---
I'm not sure how I'm practically supposed to handle this. In this case, for
one sub-directory upstream adds -Wno-format to the flags:
./Utilities/KWIML/test/CMakeLists.txt:set(CMAKE_${lang}_FLAGS
"${
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79734
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79734
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is not a GCC bug, the general rule is that the options that enable
suboptions don't change those (either way) if that option has been specified
explicitly.
So, -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-format does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski ---
Adding -Wno-format-security does indeed work. Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79733
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery |ice-checking
Priority|P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79729
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 79729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On February 27, 2017 5:46:44 PM GMT+01:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
>
>Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79735
Bug ID: 79735
Summary: C++14: syntax error in attribute deprecated silently
ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79735
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Becker ---
Filed based on
g++ (GCC) 7.0.1 20170226 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
--- Comment #7 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Using version gcc-7-20170226, above cases compile on my environment, too.
But pr79729 does not (yes, appending to this pr would have been better).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
kim.walisch at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kim.walisch at gmail dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71568
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 27 20:17:17 2017
New Revision: 245763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71568 - SFINAE forming pointer to member function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71568
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79736
Bug ID: 79736
Summary: Please submit a full bug report: unable to create
precompiled headers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.1 20170227 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79738
Bug ID: 79738
Summary: Documentation for __attribute__((const)) slightly
misleading
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79737
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79739
Bug ID: 79739
Summary: ICE with some interesting code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
As
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
