[Bug rtl-optimization/79286] [7 Regression] ira and lra wrong code at -O2 and -Os on i686-linux

2017-02-25 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2017-02-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 25 08:18:24 2017 New Revision: 245733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245733&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/77589 include/ * dwarf2.def (DW_OP_GNU_variable_v

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2017-02-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/79396] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE (verify_flow_info failed) with -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 -march=haswell

2017-02-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79396 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 25 10:17:31 2017 New Revision: 245735 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245735&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/79396 * tree-eh.c (operation_could_trap_p,

[Bug fortran/78474] [F08] gfortran accepts invalid submodule syntax

2017-02-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78474 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 25 11:36:45 2017 New Revision: 245737 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245737&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-02-25 Paul Thomas PR fortran/78474 * module.c (gfc_

[Bug fortran/78331] [F08] Misleading error message from submodule when module has no module procedures

2017-02-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 25 11:36:45 2017 New Revision: 245737 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245737&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-02-25 Paul Thomas PR fortran/78474 * module.c (gfc_

[Bug fortran/78474] [F08] gfortran accepts invalid submodule syntax

2017-02-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78474 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78331] [F08] Misleading error message from submodule when module has no module procedures

2017-02-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/79710] New: Assert of a static fixed point expression incorrectly fails

2017-02-25 Thread georggcc at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79710 Bug ID: 79710 Summary: Assert of a static fixed point expression incorrectly fails Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/79711] New: [concepts] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:22474

2017-02-25 Thread hstong at ca dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79711 Bug ID: 79711 Summary: [concepts] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:22474 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/71568] Inexplicable error: "X is inaccessible within this context" for a public member

2017-02-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71568 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- The issue is that even though nlog_custom is public in D, the pointer-to-member expression ends up being &F::nlog_custom, and F (i.e. tuple) inherits privately from C, so nlog_custom is private in F. As a re

[Bug middle-end/79712] New: Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark

2017-02-25 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712 Bug ID: 79712 Summary: Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug middle-end/79712] Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark

2017-02-25 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712 --- Comment #1 from PeteVine --- Created attachment 40830 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40830&action=edit C source

[Bug middle-end/79712] Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark

2017-02-25 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712 --- Comment #2 from PeteVine --- Created attachment 40831 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40831&action=edit inputs

[Bug target/68739] FAIL: 30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc (test for excess errors)

2017-02-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Feb 25 20:29:39 2017 New Revision: 245740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245740&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/68739 * inclhack.def (hpux11_pthread_poin

[Bug target/79712] Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark

2017-02-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/79712] Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark

2017-02-25 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712 --- Comment #4 from PeteVine --- It's a gcc version 7.0.1 20170220 (experimental) (GCC) configured with: --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --prefix=/usr/gcc7 --program-suffix=-7 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/gcc7/lib

[Bug target/79712] Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark

2017-02-25 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712 --- Comment #5 from PeteVine --- Clang however gets no further improvement from -funroll-loops meaning a simple `-O3 -mcpu=cortex-a53` produces much better performance than gcc without unrolling.

[Bug target/68739] FAIL: 30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc (test for excess errors)

2017-02-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- Fixed on trunk.

[Bug target/68739] FAIL: 30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc (test for excess errors)

2017-02-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79713] New: \f missing from c++14, at least

2017-02-25 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79713 Bug ID: 79713 Summary: \f missing from c++14, at least Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/79713] \f missing from c++14, at least

2017-02-25 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79713 --- Comment #1 from Jim Michaels --- \f is ASCII FF

[Bug c++/79713] \f missing from c++14, at least

2017-02-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79713 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- \f is 0x0c and not 0xff.

[Bug c++/79713] \f missing from c++14, at least

2017-02-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79713 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/79584] ICE in base_to_reg, at lra-constraints.c:2918

2017-02-25 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79584 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Sat Feb 25 22:44:41 2017 New Revision: 245741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245741&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR79584, ICE in base_to_reg PR rtl-optimization/79584 * lra

[Bug c/79692] [7 Regression] -Wformat-overflow false positive with unknown width

2017-02-25 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79692 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/79584] ICE in base_to_reg, at lra-constraints.c:2918

2017-02-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79584 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79714] New: error on assigning from char

2017-02-25 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79714 Bug ID: 79714 Summary: error on assigning from char Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assig

[Bug c++/71568] Inexplicable error: "X is inaccessible within this context" for a public member

2017-02-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71568 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/71568] Inexplicable error: "X is inaccessible within this context" for a public member

2017-02-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71568 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 40833 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40833&action=edit Fix Here's a patch. It seems pretty safe, but the bug isn't a regression. How important is it to have the fix

[Bug tree-optimization/79715] New: hand-rolled strdup with unused result not eliminated

2017-02-25 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79715 Bug ID: 79715 Summary: hand-rolled strdup with unused result not eliminated Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/79712] Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark

2017-02-25 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712 --- Comment #6 from PeteVine --- The difference between clang and gcc is even greater on ARMv7 Cortex A5 but there's no way to catch up through unrolling (no effect): gcc version 7.0.1 20170225:1227.2 Kpos/sec clan

[Bug tree-optimization/79716] New: memset followed by overwrite not eliminated

2017-02-25 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79716 Bug ID: 79716 Summary: memset followed by overwrite not eliminated Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-op

[Bug c/79717] New: [bug/not bug] [windows] ms_abi floating data type calling convention

2017-02-25 Thread rudyy.id at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79717 Bug ID: 79717 Summary: [bug/not bug] [windows] ms_abi floating data type calling convention Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/79718] New: gcc --vers still outputs --version

2017-02-25 Thread jg at jguk dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79718 Bug ID: 79718 Summary: gcc --vers still outputs --version Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug other/79719] New: gcc --vers still outputs command line should be checked

2017-02-25 Thread jg at jguk dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79719 Bug ID: 79719 Summary: gcc --vers still outputs command line should be checked Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori