[Bug tree-optimization/79699] New: small memory leak in MPFR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79699 Bug ID: 79699 Summary: small memory leak in MPFR Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/79697] unused realloc(0, n) not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79697 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- It makes sense to convert realloc(0, n) to just malloc and the rest just works.

[Bug tree-optimization/79699] small memory leak in MPFR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79699 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gforge.inria.fr/tra

[Bug libstdc++/79700] New: std::fabsf and std::fabsl missing from

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79700 Bug ID: 79700 Summary: std::fabsf and std::fabsl missing from Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/79700] std::fabsf and std::fabsl missing from

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79700 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79699] small memory leak in MPFR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79699 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The only mpfr_free_cache call I see in GCC is in the Fortran front end. Without such a call on exit, leaks in MPFR need not be meaningful.

[Bug tree-optimization/79699] small memory leak in MPFR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79699 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Ah, thanks for the reference. It sounds like GCC should call mpfr_free_cache before exiting as is recommended in section 4.7 Memory Handling of the MPFR manual (as I just discovered by searching for the funct

[Bug bootstrap/29741] Fails to build bootstrap under solaris 10, i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29741 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/29887] wrong-code for errno handling on overflow/underflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29887 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/29970] mixing ({...}) with VLA leads to massive breakage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29970 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, |

[Bug target/31705] inline assembler causes ICE: extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31705 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug debug/31920] Bad location information for Java local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31920 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/79697] unused realloc(0, n) not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79697 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/45397] [5/6/7 Regression] Issues with integer narrowing conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397 --- Comment #28 from Jeffrey A. Law --- WRT c#26. Yes, I would agree that finding CSE's that way is rather gross, but significantly less so than what will be required to address this problem in phi-opt. Pattern matching this is going to be si

[Bug preprocessor/79701] New: #pragma ignored "-Wcomment" has no effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79701 Bug ID: 79701 Summary: #pragma ignored "-Wcomment" has no effect Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preproc

[Bug c++/79702] New: AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX([17]) does not work with GCC=7.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79702 Bug ID: 79702 Summary: AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX([17]) does not work with GCC=7.0.1 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

<    1   2