https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79594
Bug ID: 79594
Summary: -Waggressive-loop-optimizations incomplete and/or
inconsistentt
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Feb 19 14:13:53 2017
New Revision: 245574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69523 make -Wliteral-suffix control warning
gcc:
PR c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Feb 19 16:12:34 2017
New Revision: 245576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245576&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-19 Dominique d'Humieres
PR target/71017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79380
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Feb 19 17:43:41 2017
New Revision: 245578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-02-19 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/79380
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Feb 19 18:18:33 2017
New Revision: 245579
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245579&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2017-02-19 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79402
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 19 18:27:14 2017
New Revision: 245580
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245580&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79402
* resolve.c (fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Feb 19 18:43:49 2017
New Revision: 245581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245581&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-02-19 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #10 from v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79595
Bug ID: 79595
Summary: Inconsistent grammar in diagnostic "partial
specialization %q+D does not specialize"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79596
Bug ID: 79596
Summary: translation: argument to gfc_internal_error should not
be translated
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79597
Bug ID: 79597
Summary: Incomplete error message "Expecting % "
"at %C, ", s1);
There is a trailing comma. In the corresponding "else" clause, there is a
complete sentence. One of these is probably
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79598
Bug ID: 79598
Summary: ERROR: relocation R_X86_64_32S against symbol can not
be used when making a shared object; recompile with
-fPIC
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 19 19:59:20 2017
New Revision: 245582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79447
* decl.c (gfc_se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79599
Bug ID: 79599
Summary: typo in diagnostic gfc_error ("DTIO dummy argument at
%L be a scalar"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
ful
avr-gcc-6.3.0 - compilation error
avr-gcc-7.0.1-20170219 - compilation error
I'll attach *.ii files for every gcc version.
Build string:
avr-g++ -save-temps -std=c++11 -Wall -Os -pedantic -mmcu=atxmega128a3u -c 1.cpp
-o 1.o && avr-g++ -std=c++11 -Wall -Os -mmcu=atxmega128a3u 1.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600
--- Comment #1 from smalcom ---
Created attachment 40775
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40775&action=edit
ii from 4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600
--- Comment #2 from smalcom ---
Created attachment 40776
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40776&action=edit
ii from 6.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600
--- Comment #3 from smalcom ---
Created attachment 40777
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40777&action=edit
ii from 7.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79601
Bug ID: 79601
Summary: Possibly wrong use of keyword "intent" in diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79602
Bug ID: 79602
Summary: translation: globally replace '%s' with %qs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79603
Bug ID: 79603
Summary: make diagnostics more i18n-friendly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79604
Bug ID: 79604
Summary: attribute noreturn inconsistent between C and C++,
undocumented for function pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79605
Bug ID: 79605
Summary: attribute [[noreturn]] accepted in explicit
instantiation directives
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79503
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> > It should be fixed now. Closing.
>
> I forgot to commit the fix to the 5 branch, done now. I also noticed that
> the same problem occurs with
>
> #define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2017-02-18, at 1:51 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Oh, (void*)1 works, it's only rejec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2017-02-17 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79500
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606
Bug ID: 79606
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer in
template
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79470
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79380
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79400
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607
Bug ID: 79607
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with brace-initialization of
static const member
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607
--- Comment #1 from Volker Reichelt ---
This might be related to PR79535.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Hm?
>
> same sorry with GCC 6.2 for me.
The r238558 change has been backported to 6.x branch in r238577.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79535
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Your code is invalid, the initializer for an enumerator must be a constant
expression and you can't use reinterpret_cast in a constant expression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79608
Bug ID: 79608
Summary: missing space in error message "bepositive"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600
--- Comment #5 from smalcom ---
Second error string... I'm stupid. Thanks for help.
So, old compilers just kinder?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79609
Bug ID: 79609
Summary: C address space qualifiers not available under
-fno-asm, even for system headers and __extension__
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79609
--- Comment #1 from roland at gnu dot org ---
Note Clang uses __attribute__((address_space(N))) for this. That automagically
handles the parsing issues in a well-known fashion, and gets C++ support for
free to boot.
Unfortunately they use per-ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79610
Bug ID: 79610
Summary: missing space in diagnostic: %qD must be a global
variable in
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79611
Bug ID: 79611
Summary: missing space in diagnostic: placement new
constructing an object of type %qT
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79612
Bug ID: 79612
Summary: missing space in diagnostic: Incorrect rank of return
array in
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79613
Bug ID: 79613
Summary: missing space in diagnostic: GLOBAL CONST-PROP:
Replacing reg %d in jump_insn
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79614
Bug ID: 79614
Summary: missing space in diagnostic: the mangled name of the
initialization guard variable for
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79615
Bug ID: 79615
Summary: missing space in diagnostic: Substring out of bounds:
lower bound
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79598
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79616
Bug ID: 79616
Summary: missing space in diagnostic: Inlined into %s which now
has time
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79617
Bug ID: 79617
Summary: missing space in diagnostic: IF clause without
modifier at %L used together
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79611
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79611
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79614
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79618
Bug ID: 79618
Summary: prevent missing space in multiline string literals
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79618
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
Furthermore, the space should either be always at the end of the line or always
at the beginning of the next line. Currently both variants are used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79619
Bug ID: 79619
Summary: store via pointer obtained from alternate address
space offset 0 dropped
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79619
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely assuming null pointers are undefined even for non default address
spaces.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Sutton ---
Hmm... I haven't looked at this in a while. It looks like the expansion of
ConstructibleObject is triggering the diagnostic. I'm a
little surprised that this gets diagnosed -- especially with a "sorry". But i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79620
Bug ID: 79620
Summary: decltype() inside a lambda capturing-by-value
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79621
Bug ID: 79621
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:732
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622
Bug ID: 79622
Summary: [7 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79503
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:03:45 2017
New Revision: 245586
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245586&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79503 - inherited ctor taking base class
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79400
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:45 2017
New Revision: 245590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79400 - confusing suggestion of 'noexcept'
* parse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:08 2017
New Revision: 245587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79580 - ICE with compound literal
* parser.c (cp_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79470
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:38 2017
New Revision: 245589
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245589&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79470 - partial ordering with reference parameters
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79500
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:31 2017
New Revision: 245588
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245588&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79500 - ICE with non-template deduction guide
* pt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:54 2017
New Revision: 245591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79566 - elaborated-type-specifier in range for
* p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:06:03 2017
New Revision: 245592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79607 - ICE with T{} initializer
* decl.c (type_de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:06:39 2017
New Revision: 245594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78282 - auto template and pack expansion
* pt.c (f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 06:06:20 2017
New Revision: 245593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79606 - ICE with this->base_member in NSDMI
* clas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79503
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79500
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79623
Bug ID: 79623
Summary: error building a cross compiler for powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79470
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79400
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE with |[5/6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[6/7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Overload |[6 Regression] Overload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229
--- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #6)
> Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.
All fine with our code. Thanks for the quick fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79151
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Another test case.
It might even be profitable just to look for divisions, because these
are so expensive that packing/unpacking should always be
profitable.
double foo(double a, double b)
{
return 1/a +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624
Bug ID: 79624
Summary: comma separate auto variables deduce different types
under dependent lookup
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe a dup of bug 78693 which was fixed after 6.3.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Or rather a dup of bug 59960.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Or PR 79009 .
98 matches
Mail list logo
